Man wanted for stealing $7K in water heaters from Cumberland County business

Police in Cumberland County are looking for a man they said used a fraudulent purchase order to steal nearly $7,000 worth of water heaters and parts from a Lower Allen Township business last month.Officers were sent to R.F. Fager, Inc., located at 2058 State Road, around 9 a.m. on Nov. 19 after the assistant manager reported a theft.The manager said a man came into the business around 2:42 p.m. on Nov. 13 after placing an order for pickup, according to a police report.The man received nearly $7,000 in water heaters and parts and left in a GMC pickup truck. However, the order was fraudulently placed under the account of another company who did not authorize the purchase.Police said the man fraudulently placed the order under another company’s account and left with the items before anyone noticed.

Credit: Lower Allen Township Police DepartmentLower Allen Township Police DepartmentThe man’s identity is unknown as of Saturday. Anyone with information that can identify the man is asked to call Lower Allen Township police at 717-238-9676.

Start the week with a film: Clint Eastwood’s ‘Juror #2’ makes a solid case for itself

Nicholas Hoult in Juror #2 (2024)

|

Malpaso Productions/Warner Bros

In Clint Eastwood’s 40th film, restraint is all around. The acting is subdued. The writing is stripped of flourishes. The staging is as plain as a TV show. If Juror #2 is potentially 94-year-old Clint Eastwood’s last movie, there is neither fuss nor a sense of self-importance.Juror #2 has the ‘let’s just get on with it’ quality that has characterised Eastwood’s movies in recent years. Eastwood relies on a compelling script by Jonathan Abrams and an efficient cast that includes Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette and Chris Messina. The legal drama has a neat premise too: a juror begins to wonder if he is responsible for the crime that has been pinned on the man he is supposed to convict.Justin (Nicholas Hoult) is a recovering alcoholic who’s expecting a child with his wife Allison (Zoey Deutch). After being called up to jury duty, Justin is wracked by doubt over whether James (Gabriel Basso) actually killed his girlfriend after a drunken brawl. Did James push his lover into a ditch – or was Justin who ran over her by mistake?Public prosecutor Faith (Toni Collette) wants to win the case since it will boost her chances of winning a district attorney election. Defence lawyer Eric (Chris Messina) is convinced of his client’s innocence. The jury deliberations are not as clear-cut as Faith hoped they would be.Debate – one of the cornerstones of the judicial process – creeps into the discussions, making Justin as well as the other jurors see James’s pre-decided culpability in a new light. Justin is conflicted between doing what is right for the abstract cause of justice and protecting himself and his family.The film can be rented from Prime Video, Apple TV+, YouTube Movies and Google Play. Eastwood’s unvarnished style, while sometimes underplaying the extent of Justin’s dilemma, is a welcome departure from typically aggressive and overly dramatised legal thrillers.Eastwood commands attention over 114 minutes by moving his camera from one character to another, maintaining the suspense over Justin’s fate, and eschewing distracting sub-plots. Juror #2 runs in the opposite direction of flashiness, delivering a film that is unfussy, engrossing and perfectly suited for post-prandial consumption.

Juror #2 (2024).

Psychologist: Seven things to add or subtract for happiness, according to science

The science of happinessScholars and philosophers have always been interested in what makes for a good life, but the scientific study of happiness took off in the late 1990s with a new field called positive psychology. The next decade saw an explosion of research on happiness, with hundreds of studies on the topic published in academic journals.Then, around 2012, the happiness bubble burst. Psychology researchers came to the unsettling realisation that many of their findings were wrong. Published studies had often relied on faulty, but common, publishing practices. There was p-hacking, or manipulating data analyses until statistically significant results were squeezed out, and HARKing (Hypothesising After Results are Known), or changing one’s hypotheses after-the-fact to match obtained results.When carefully scrutinised, the findings did not hold up. For instance, priming people with stereotypes about older people does not cause them to walk more slowly. Encouraging people to think about smart professors instead of football hooligans does not make them better at trivia.AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.This all came to a head when a highly respected journal published a paper claiming to find evidence of extrasensory perception (ESP). Relying on dubious statistical methods, it suggested that people’s behaviour could be influenced by future events that had not yet happened. (To be clear, this is not a real thing).New research standards were needed.Pre-registration to the rescueTo stamp out p-hacking, HARKing and other acronymised no-nos, the field of psychology has entered a new era of transparency. As part of this larger movement toward “open science,” one new research standard is increasingly common practice.It’s called “pre-registration,” and the idea behind it is simple. Researchers make public their plans for studies, including all the analyses they’re going to run, before they do so. No more after-the-fact tinkering, or selectively reporting certain analyses, or changing the statistical methods until they get the finding they hypothesised.Discover moreAs a result, we can generally be more confident in the results of pre-registered studies.It’s not a perfect solution. Transparency alone does not guarantee quality. At worst, a “pre-registered” label can be misleading, creating the illusion of rigour without the methodological strength to back it up. Critics of pre-registration also argue it limits scientific flexibility, prioritises certain methods at the expense of others, and creates unnecessary (and, at times, costly) administrative burden.That said, the growing use of pre-registration is moving psychology research in the right direction. At least, that’s what my ESP is telling me.How to be happy, based on (good) scienceWhat happens when we narrow the number of happiness studies to only those that were pre-registered?The number gets a whole lot smaller.A team of researchers at the University of British Columbia systematically reviewed every experimental study on happiness, but limited their search only to those that had been pre-registered. The result? Just 65 studies, which is a drop in the bucket in the world of happiness research. The benefit of this approach, though, is that it increases the likelihood that these 65 studies are good ones.AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.So, what do these studies tell us? How can we be happier?The researchers break down evidence-backed happiness boosters into two categories: addition (things we can add to our lives) and subtraction (things we can eliminate from our lives).Things to add to make us happier1. Express gratitudeThink about how grateful you are for someone in your life, and consider telling them. In one study, participants’ moods improved after being told to write a gratitude letter to someone (without sending it), send a gratitude text, or post their gratitude on social media.2. Be more socialSpend time connecting with the people around you. One study randomly assigned people to talk to a stranger while commuting (vs their typical commuting activities), and those people reported being in a better mood during the commute.AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.3. Act happySmile! One study showed that asking people to smile naturally (for example, by mimicking a person smiling in a photo) improved mood. The key is a natural smile, as one commonly cited study that involved participants biting on pens (to produce a smile-like facial expression) have been mostly debunked.4. Increase noveltyWe are all subject to hedonic adaption, or the idea that we quickly adapt to positive experiences. One way to avoid this is through injecting novelty into everyday experiences. For example, one study randomly assigned people to treat their weekend as a vacation, resulting in better moods and greater satisfaction when they returned to work on Monday. Another study – in all seriousness – assigned people to create “hand goggles” when watching a video for the third time, thereby making the experience more novel and increasing enjoyment.5. Help othersWe feel happier when we choose to spend money on others, like through gifts or donations. For example, when people are randomly assigned to spend money on themselves or on someone in need, those who spend the money on others report better moods afterward.AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.Things to subtract to make us happier1. Reduce unpleasant time useDo less of the things you don’t like. One study gave participants $40 to spend on a purchase that would save them time (for example, paying someone to do household chores). Another weekend, they gave participants $40 to spend on a material purchase. When participants made the time-saving purchase, they felt less pressed for time and, subsequently, happier.2. Reduce smartphone and social media useAs someone who studies the impact of smartphones and social media on mental health, I know firsthand that this research is complicated. The evidence suggests that reducing use will not increase happiness per se, but that it is more likely to do so when it enhances our participation in the social situations around us, and when it extends for a longer stretch of time (one month vs one day).This is not an all-encompassing list. The downside of this research approach is that it leaves out a lot of studies, some of them high-quality. Decades of research, for example, support the benefits of exercise, sleep, spending time in nature and many other interventions. These may be effective for increasing happiness, but there are few (if any) pre-registered experiments proving it.In time, the body of rigorous, preregistered research on happiness will grow. For now, the best we can do is follow this list and, otherwise, do things the old-fashioned way: without good science to guide us.AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.

Iran honors top Science Olympiad medalists

Gisoo Misha AhmadiPress TV, Tehran

In a grand ceremony attended by the president of Iran, the achievements of 33 outstanding students were celebrated, as they received recognition for their success in the prestigious 2024 Global Science Olympiads. These talented young individuals have brought pride to the nation by excelling in various scientific fields.

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:
www.presstv.co.uk

Billy Eichner sells Christmas comedy movie to Amazon about NYC ‘mother-son duo’ visiting Vermont family

Billy Eichner spoke to Page Six at the Broadway opening of “Gypsy.” Getty Images

Billy Eichner is already in the Christmas spirit for next year.

The “Mufasa: The Lion King” star said that he recently sold a script to Amazon for a Christmas comedy.

The Queens native, 46, is co-writing the upcoming project with celebrated playwright and “Sister Act” screenwriter Paul Rudnick.

Eichner will also co-star in it.

“It’s about a mother-son duo from New York City who go up to spend Christmas with my character’s creepy brother in a charming small town in Vermont,” Eichner explained.

Explore More

(If he needs casting ideas, we’re thinking of Jessica Lange, Meryl Streep, Kathy Bates or Helen Mirren as the mom.)

The comedian shared that he recently sold a script he co-wrote with Paul Rudnick. Brett D. Cove / SplashNews.com

Rudnick wrote the screenplays for “Sister Act” and “In & Out.” Getty Images

The “Parks and Recreation” alum chatted with us at the Broadway opening of “Gypsy” and happily dispelled a commonly held misconception about his bar mitzvah theme.

“It has been widely reported that it was Madonna-themed,” he revealed. “That’s slightly inaccurate. It was technically Broadway meets pop music because I couldn’t decide.”

He added: “So on one side of the DJ booth there was a life-size airbrushed portrait of Madonna and on the other side of the DJ booth was a similarly life-size airbrushed picture of ‘The Phantom of the Opera.’ ”

The “Parks & Rec” alum shared that he’ll also co-star in the flick. Christopher Peterson / SplashNews.com

Eichner, who voices Timon in “The Lion King,” chatted to Page Six about his bar-mitzvah theme. ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection

So judging by the theme, did his parents know at the time that their son was gay?

“I think they knew before that. I think they knew when I was 5 years old and spinning thinking I was ‘Wonder Woman,’ ” he opined.

Other celebs at the splashy Broadway opening included Lea Michele, Jonathan Groff, Laverne Cox, Iman, Rosie Perez and “Frasier” star David Hyde Pierce.

Want more celebrity and pop culture news?

Start your day with Page Six Daily.

Thanks for signing up!

Eichner had a pop music and Broadway theme for his Bar Mitzvah Getty Images

Also at the show, director George C. Wolfe shared that he doesn’t agree with W.C. Fields adage never to work with dogs or kids.

His latest production, “Gypsy,” has both.

“All of them have been great,” he enthused, “so he was wrong!”