Mufasa: The Lion King Worldwide Box Office: Less Than $6M Away From Becoming The 8th Highest-Grossing Film Of 2024!

Mufasa: The Lion King Worldwide Box Office: Set To Become The #8 Biggest Film Of 2024( Photo Credit – Instagram )
Mufasa: The Lion King is now performing better than Sonic the Hedgehog 3 at the box office. The animated feature is adamant about beating Kung Fu Panda 4, as it is also on track to beat the movie at the worldwide box office, in addition to targeting it at the US box office. Scroll below for the deets.

The weekend actuals for Mufasa came in higher, and it is nearing the $550 million mark worldwide. It was made on an estimated budget of $200 million and has crossed the break-even point. Kung Fu Panda 4 is the 8th highest-grossing film of 2024, but that will change soon. Mufasa surpassed Venom: The Last Dance’s $478.10 million worldwide collection.

Mufasa: The Lion King’s US gross this weekend is on par with Jumanji: The Next Level’s same weekend post-holiday number. It has collected $14.2 million during the 4th three-day weekend in the United States, as per Luiz Fernando’s report. The film has successfully hit the $189.8 million cume in North America, and the $200 million mark will be achieved by this weekend. The Disney sequel/prequel will collect $230 million to $260 million in the US.

It will soon surpass Bad Boys: Ride or Die’s $193.57 million domestic haul and Kung Fu Panda 4’s $193.59 million haul in the US and enter the top 10 list. Mufasa is also close to surpassing Kung Fu Panda 4 at the worldwide box office, and it is approximately $5.39 million away from beating it.
Mufasa: The Lion King grossed a strong $29.5 million overseas during its 4th weekend, and with that, the movie crossed the $350 million mark. It has reached a $352.5 million international cume over all the 53 markets. Added to the $189.8 million US cume, Mufasa hits $542.3 million worldwide. Meanwhile, Kung Fu Panda 4’s global total is $547.68 million. After beating the Dreamworks Animation film, it will become the 8th highest-grossing picture of 2024.
According to the report, it is eyeing a $650-$700 million global run, meaning Mufasa might end its theatrical journey as the 7th or 6th highest-grossing movie of last year.
Mufasa: The Lion King was released on December 20.
Note: Box office numbers are based on estimates and various sources. Numbers have not been independently verified by Koimoi.
Check out the latest Hollywood News!
Must Read: Wicked North America Box Office: Axes Avengers: Age Of Ultron’s $459M+ To Achieve A Remarkable Feat!
Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google News

Mufasa: The Lion King Worldwide Box Office: Less Than $6M Away From Becoming The 8th Highest-Grossing Film Of 2024!

Mufasa: The Lion King Worldwide Box Office: Set To Become The #8 Biggest Film Of 2024( Photo Credit – Instagram )
Mufasa: The Lion King is now performing better than Sonic the Hedgehog 3 at the box office. The animated feature is adamant about beating Kung Fu Panda 4, as it is also on track to beat the movie at the worldwide box office, in addition to targeting it at the US box office. Scroll below for the deets.

The weekend actuals for Mufasa came in higher, and it is nearing the $550 million mark worldwide. It was made on an estimated budget of $200 million and has crossed the break-even point. Kung Fu Panda 4 is the 8th highest-grossing film of 2024, but that will change soon. Mufasa surpassed Venom: The Last Dance’s $478.10 million worldwide collection.

Mufasa: The Lion King’s US gross this weekend is on par with Jumanji: The Next Level’s same weekend post-holiday number. It has collected $14.2 million during the 4th three-day weekend in the United States, as per Luiz Fernando’s report. The film has successfully hit the $189.8 million cume in North America, and the $200 million mark will be achieved by this weekend. The Disney sequel/prequel will collect $230 million to $260 million in the US.

It will soon surpass Bad Boys: Ride or Die’s $193.57 million domestic haul and Kung Fu Panda 4’s $193.59 million haul in the US and enter the top 10 list. Mufasa is also close to surpassing Kung Fu Panda 4 at the worldwide box office, and it is approximately $5.39 million away from beating it.
Mufasa: The Lion King grossed a strong $29.5 million overseas during its 4th weekend, and with that, the movie crossed the $350 million mark. It has reached a $352.5 million international cume over all the 53 markets. Added to the $189.8 million US cume, Mufasa hits $542.3 million worldwide. Meanwhile, Kung Fu Panda 4’s global total is $547.68 million. After beating the Dreamworks Animation film, it will become the 8th highest-grossing picture of 2024.
According to the report, it is eyeing a $650-$700 million global run, meaning Mufasa might end its theatrical journey as the 7th or 6th highest-grossing movie of last year.
Mufasa: The Lion King was released on December 20.
Note: Box office numbers are based on estimates and various sources. Numbers have not been independently verified by Koimoi.
Check out the latest Hollywood News!
Must Read: Wicked North America Box Office: Axes Avengers: Age Of Ultron’s $459M+ To Achieve A Remarkable Feat!
Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google News

Sri Lanka’s Deputy Minister Urges Strengthened Tourism and Cultural Exchanges with China

Ruwan Ranasinghe, Sri Lanka’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment, and Tourism, has expressed admiration for China’s diverse culture, cuisine, and friendly people. Speaking to Xinhua, he shared his hope that more Chinese tourists would visit Sri Lanka to experience the country’s scenic beauty and rich cultural heritage.

In 2014, Ranasinghe fulfilled his dream of studying in China. Under the Belt and Road Initiative, he received a Chinese government scholarship to pursue a doctorate in tourism management at Sichuan University. During his time in China, Ranasinghe and his mentor established the International Center for Interdisciplinary Culture Heritage & Tourism Research (SCU-UWU) and witnessed the growing interest of Chinese tourists in Sri Lanka.

In 2017, China became the second-largest source of tourists to Sri Lanka, with over 260,000 Chinese visitors that year. However, domestic challenges and the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant decline in Chinese tourist arrivals. With the resurgence of international travel post-pandemic, Ranasinghe emphasized Sri Lanka’s readiness to welcome Chinese tourists again. The government is working to enhance convenience for Chinese travelers through streamlined visa processes and direct flights, aiming to position Sri Lanka as a preferred destination.

Ranasinghe highlighted the deep economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties between Sri Lanka and China. He praised the Belt and Road Initiative projects, such as the Colombo Port City and Hambantota Port, for contributing to Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and fostering collaboration between the two nations.

During Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s state visit to China from January 14 to 17, Ranasinghe anticipated further progress in trade, investment, and cultural exchanges. He noted the historical connections between the two countries, referencing visits by the Chinese monk Fa Xian and navigator Zheng He, as examples of long-standing cultural interactions.

Ranasinghe concluded by expressing his belief in the enduring bond between the two nations. “I went to school in Sichuan and learned that Sichuan people love spicy food, just like Sri Lankans. I warmly welcome more Chinese tourists to visit my hometown and deepen the connection between our peoples.”

Sri Lanka’s Deputy Minister Urges Strengthened Tourism and Cultural Exchanges with China

Ruwan Ranasinghe, Sri Lanka’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment, and Tourism, has expressed admiration for China’s diverse culture, cuisine, and friendly people. Speaking to Xinhua, he shared his hope that more Chinese tourists would visit Sri Lanka to experience the country’s scenic beauty and rich cultural heritage.

In 2014, Ranasinghe fulfilled his dream of studying in China. Under the Belt and Road Initiative, he received a Chinese government scholarship to pursue a doctorate in tourism management at Sichuan University. During his time in China, Ranasinghe and his mentor established the International Center for Interdisciplinary Culture Heritage & Tourism Research (SCU-UWU) and witnessed the growing interest of Chinese tourists in Sri Lanka.

In 2017, China became the second-largest source of tourists to Sri Lanka, with over 260,000 Chinese visitors that year. However, domestic challenges and the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant decline in Chinese tourist arrivals. With the resurgence of international travel post-pandemic, Ranasinghe emphasized Sri Lanka’s readiness to welcome Chinese tourists again. The government is working to enhance convenience for Chinese travelers through streamlined visa processes and direct flights, aiming to position Sri Lanka as a preferred destination.

Ranasinghe highlighted the deep economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties between Sri Lanka and China. He praised the Belt and Road Initiative projects, such as the Colombo Port City and Hambantota Port, for contributing to Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and fostering collaboration between the two nations.

During Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s state visit to China from January 14 to 17, Ranasinghe anticipated further progress in trade, investment, and cultural exchanges. He noted the historical connections between the two countries, referencing visits by the Chinese monk Fa Xian and navigator Zheng He, as examples of long-standing cultural interactions.

Ranasinghe concluded by expressing his belief in the enduring bond between the two nations. “I went to school in Sichuan and learned that Sichuan people love spicy food, just like Sri Lankans. I warmly welcome more Chinese tourists to visit my hometown and deepen the connection between our peoples.”

Who was the first female movie director?

(Credits: Far Out / Austrian National Library) Wed 15 January 2025 0:30, UK The film industry still lags woefully behind others when it comes to gender representation. In the nearly 100 years since the Academy Awards began, only eight women have been nominated for ‘Best Director’—compared to more than 400 men. Remarkably, it wasn’t until 2010—over eight decades after the Oscars’ inception—that a woman finally took home the coveted statuette.However, women have been helming movies since the dawn of the medium itself. Critics and studio heads might have repeatedly passed over them, but they were there, putting in the same blood, sweat, and tears as any of their male counterparts. The first woman to direct a movie was Alice Guy-Blaché, who began making films in 1896. Born in France, she began her career as a secretary at a camera manufacturing company, where she became acquainted with the Lumière brothers. Inspired by their work, she gained permission to try out her company’s cameras, kickstarting her career as a director. Between 1896 and 1920, Guy-Blaché made more than 400 films, including what is considered to be the first narrative film, La Fée aux Choux. After moving to the then-vibrant filmmaking town of Fort Lee, New Jersey, Guy-Blaché’s career accelerated, and she even opened her own company, becoming the first female studio head. In 1912, she directed A Fool and His Money, which is believed to be either the first or one of the earliest films featuring a Black cast.When Guy-Blaché moved back to France in 1920, she struggled to find work as a director. When she died in 1968 at the age of 94, she was all but forgotten. Her tombstone merely featured her name and the dates of her birth and death. It wasn’t until the 21st century that her influence on cinema was fully acknowledged. Alice Guy-Blaché – 1913 (Credits: Far Out / Apeda Studio New York)Who was Hollywood’s first female director? Guy-Blaché stopped making movies around the time the American film industry relocated to southern California. Hollywood reshaped cinema as we know it, turning it into an assembly line of entertainment that rakes in billions of dollars every year. Such a world was even more challenging for women to break into than the nascent film industry that Guy-Blaché conquered, which made Dorothy Arzner an outlier for decades.Born in San Francisco in 1897, Arzner got her start in the film industry thanks to World War I. With male filmmakers in short supply, the studios needed novices and women to fill their shoes, and Arzner was more than up to the task. She worked her way up from typing up scripts to editing, where she became an invaluable collaborator for several directors. She was so valuable, in fact, that she was able to leverage her way into her first picture by threatening to leave Paramount for Columbia Pictures. Between 1919 and 1943, Arzner directed close to two dozen films, including the first sound picture directed by a woman. Some of her movies were mainstream hits, including the burlesque comedy Dance, Girl, Dance, starring future television mogul Lucille Ball and frequent John Wayne co-star Maureen O’Hara. Arzner was the first female director to earn membership of the Director’s Guild of America, but retired from Hollywood in 1943 after she struggled to regain success at the box office. The fact that she was female and gay may have contributed to the lack of work that came her way. It wasn’t until the rise of the Feminist movement in the 1970s that her work was rediscovered and celebrated. Dorothy Arzner – 1934 (Credits: Far Out / Wikimedia)And the first female director to be nominated for an Oscar?Even though women had been directing movies since the 19th century, it wasn’t until 1977 that a female filmmaker was nominated for ‘Best Director’ at the Academy Awards. When it happened, it wasn’t a Hollywood filmmaker who received the distinction; it was an avant-garde Italian auteur. Lina Wertmüller was born in Rome in 1928 and got her start as a director under the mentorship of Federico Fellini. She was his assistant director on 8½ before making her directorial debut on 1963’s The Basilisks. Her films often featured political themes, but were full of colour, sound, and tonal dissonance. The film that earned her the ‘Best Director’ nomination was the perfect example. 1975’s Pasqualino Settebellezze (or Seven Beauties to English-speaking audiences) stars Wertmüller’s frequent collaborator Giancarlo Giannini as a low-level criminal in Naples who stumbles his way into World War II and ends up in a concentration camp. It’s visually arresting and tonally all over the place. It’s full of comedy but also features one of the most harrowing depictions of Nazi brutality of the decade. In her review of the film, famed New Yorker critic Pauline Kael said of Wertmüller, “She says she has a penchant for the grotesque, but that is not the same as having a talent for it,” which may explain, along with the fact that some of the misogyny and themes of her films haven’t aged well, why Wertmüller is rarely mentioned alongside other pioneering female filmmakers like Chantal Akerman, Jane Campion, and Kathryn Bigelow. Wertmüller lost the award that year to John G Avildsen for Rocky, who also beat Sidney Lumet, Alan J Pakula, and Ingmar Bergman. It took another 33 years for Bigelow to finally become the first woman to take home the statuette for The Hurt Locker.(Credits: Far Out / MUBI)Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

Who was the first female movie director?

(Credits: Far Out / Austrian National Library) Wed 15 January 2025 0:30, UK The film industry still lags woefully behind others when it comes to gender representation. In the nearly 100 years since the Academy Awards began, only eight women have been nominated for ‘Best Director’—compared to more than 400 men. Remarkably, it wasn’t until 2010—over eight decades after the Oscars’ inception—that a woman finally took home the coveted statuette.However, women have been helming movies since the dawn of the medium itself. Critics and studio heads might have repeatedly passed over them, but they were there, putting in the same blood, sweat, and tears as any of their male counterparts. The first woman to direct a movie was Alice Guy-Blaché, who began making films in 1896. Born in France, she began her career as a secretary at a camera manufacturing company, where she became acquainted with the Lumière brothers. Inspired by their work, she gained permission to try out her company’s cameras, kickstarting her career as a director. Between 1896 and 1920, Guy-Blaché made more than 400 films, including what is considered to be the first narrative film, La Fée aux Choux. After moving to the then-vibrant filmmaking town of Fort Lee, New Jersey, Guy-Blaché’s career accelerated, and she even opened her own company, becoming the first female studio head. In 1912, she directed A Fool and His Money, which is believed to be either the first or one of the earliest films featuring a Black cast.When Guy-Blaché moved back to France in 1920, she struggled to find work as a director. When she died in 1968 at the age of 94, she was all but forgotten. Her tombstone merely featured her name and the dates of her birth and death. It wasn’t until the 21st century that her influence on cinema was fully acknowledged. Alice Guy-Blaché – 1913 (Credits: Far Out / Apeda Studio New York)Who was Hollywood’s first female director? Guy-Blaché stopped making movies around the time the American film industry relocated to southern California. Hollywood reshaped cinema as we know it, turning it into an assembly line of entertainment that rakes in billions of dollars every year. Such a world was even more challenging for women to break into than the nascent film industry that Guy-Blaché conquered, which made Dorothy Arzner an outlier for decades.Born in San Francisco in 1897, Arzner got her start in the film industry thanks to World War I. With male filmmakers in short supply, the studios needed novices and women to fill their shoes, and Arzner was more than up to the task. She worked her way up from typing up scripts to editing, where she became an invaluable collaborator for several directors. She was so valuable, in fact, that she was able to leverage her way into her first picture by threatening to leave Paramount for Columbia Pictures. Between 1919 and 1943, Arzner directed close to two dozen films, including the first sound picture directed by a woman. Some of her movies were mainstream hits, including the burlesque comedy Dance, Girl, Dance, starring future television mogul Lucille Ball and frequent John Wayne co-star Maureen O’Hara. Arzner was the first female director to earn membership of the Director’s Guild of America, but retired from Hollywood in 1943 after she struggled to regain success at the box office. The fact that she was female and gay may have contributed to the lack of work that came her way. It wasn’t until the rise of the Feminist movement in the 1970s that her work was rediscovered and celebrated. Dorothy Arzner – 1934 (Credits: Far Out / Wikimedia)And the first female director to be nominated for an Oscar?Even though women had been directing movies since the 19th century, it wasn’t until 1977 that a female filmmaker was nominated for ‘Best Director’ at the Academy Awards. When it happened, it wasn’t a Hollywood filmmaker who received the distinction; it was an avant-garde Italian auteur. Lina Wertmüller was born in Rome in 1928 and got her start as a director under the mentorship of Federico Fellini. She was his assistant director on 8½ before making her directorial debut on 1963’s The Basilisks. Her films often featured political themes, but were full of colour, sound, and tonal dissonance. The film that earned her the ‘Best Director’ nomination was the perfect example. 1975’s Pasqualino Settebellezze (or Seven Beauties to English-speaking audiences) stars Wertmüller’s frequent collaborator Giancarlo Giannini as a low-level criminal in Naples who stumbles his way into World War II and ends up in a concentration camp. It’s visually arresting and tonally all over the place. It’s full of comedy but also features one of the most harrowing depictions of Nazi brutality of the decade. In her review of the film, famed New Yorker critic Pauline Kael said of Wertmüller, “She says she has a penchant for the grotesque, but that is not the same as having a talent for it,” which may explain, along with the fact that some of the misogyny and themes of her films haven’t aged well, why Wertmüller is rarely mentioned alongside other pioneering female filmmakers like Chantal Akerman, Jane Campion, and Kathryn Bigelow. Wertmüller lost the award that year to John G Avildsen for Rocky, who also beat Sidney Lumet, Alan J Pakula, and Ingmar Bergman. It took another 33 years for Bigelow to finally become the first woman to take home the statuette for The Hurt Locker.(Credits: Far Out / MUBI)Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

The film Ridley Scott called the thinking man’s scary movie: “I’m scared about getting highbrow”

(Credits: Far Out / Alamy) Wed 15 January 2025 2:30, UK Ridley Scott isn’t necessarily thought of as a horror director, but he has contributed his fair share to the genre. In 2001, he made Hannibal, a sequel to The Silence of the Lambs with Anthony Hopkins returning to the role of Hannibal Lecter. Whilst that film got mixed reviews, there’s also the small matter of perhaps the greatest sci-fi horror movie of all time – Alien. Scott’s slasher movie in space changed the game in so many ways. Not only did it allow Sigourney Weaver to break the mould as a female hero, but it also gave the world the Xenomorph, one of the scariest beasts ever to grace a screen. Whilst the immediate follow-up to the film – James Cameron’s Aliens – is more of an action flick, other entries in the series have returned to these horror roots. One of which, according to Scott at least, does so in a very clever way.In 2017, Scott put out Alien: Covenant, the sixth film in the franchise and a sequel to 2012’s Prometheus. “When I decided to resurrect the story, I felt I couldn’t let it go so dark so soon,” Scott told Variety, referring to his return to the series after 33 years away. “When we did Prometheus, it was a more genteel way of easing back into it.” He labelled Covenant as “a thinking man’s scary movie,” before saying, “it’s definitely an R, don’t show the kids. I decided I better nail this one, so I did.”Set 15 years after Prometheus (and 18 years before the original film), Covenant features just one returning cast member from its predecessor; Michael Fassbender as the android David. Fassbender also plays Walter, a more advanced robot, and is joined by Katherine Waterson, Danny McBride, Jussie Smollet, and Billy Crudup. The crew of the titular ship stumble across David, a survivor from a previous run-in with the Xenomorphs, and join forces with him to battle an altered version of the creature.“It’s the hardest thing to do,” said Scott of making people feel frightened at the movies. “Comedians will disagree, but I think it’s easier to make people laugh than to really, really scare the s— out of somebody. We’ve seen so ew much, we get a little bit numb to what should be scary. I’m not sure that’s a good thing.” He also addressed the complaints about Prometheus being too complicated and leaving too loose ends. ““All those things are answered: why and to what purpose they exist,” he said. “I’m scared about getting highbrow, but it raises questions of creationism and all that.”Whilst critical reviews of Covenant decried the film for falling back on old habits, they were mostly satisfied with the scares on hand. Previously ‘Alien’ films had been far too grand, a far cry from the confined terror of the original. This one returned the series to its roots; one monster, a group of underdog victims; a single location far from safety. However, the film underperformed at the box office, which might explain why it took another seven years for the franchise to make a return.That came in 2024 with the release of Alien: Romulus. Though Scott served as one of the producers on the project, directorial duties were handed over to Fede Álvarez. Romulus also received strong reviews and, crucially, was a much bigger success financially. According to Álvarez, Scott’s reaction to seeing the film was simple – “And then he walks into the room and he did say, ‘Fede, what can I say? It’s fucking great.”[embedded content]Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

The film Ridley Scott called the thinking man’s scary movie: “I’m scared about getting highbrow”

(Credits: Far Out / Alamy) Wed 15 January 2025 2:30, UK Ridley Scott isn’t necessarily thought of as a horror director, but he has contributed his fair share to the genre. In 2001, he made Hannibal, a sequel to The Silence of the Lambs with Anthony Hopkins returning to the role of Hannibal Lecter. Whilst that film got mixed reviews, there’s also the small matter of perhaps the greatest sci-fi horror movie of all time – Alien. Scott’s slasher movie in space changed the game in so many ways. Not only did it allow Sigourney Weaver to break the mould as a female hero, but it also gave the world the Xenomorph, one of the scariest beasts ever to grace a screen. Whilst the immediate follow-up to the film – James Cameron’s Aliens – is more of an action flick, other entries in the series have returned to these horror roots. One of which, according to Scott at least, does so in a very clever way.In 2017, Scott put out Alien: Covenant, the sixth film in the franchise and a sequel to 2012’s Prometheus. “When I decided to resurrect the story, I felt I couldn’t let it go so dark so soon,” Scott told Variety, referring to his return to the series after 33 years away. “When we did Prometheus, it was a more genteel way of easing back into it.” He labelled Covenant as “a thinking man’s scary movie,” before saying, “it’s definitely an R, don’t show the kids. I decided I better nail this one, so I did.”Set 15 years after Prometheus (and 18 years before the original film), Covenant features just one returning cast member from its predecessor; Michael Fassbender as the android David. Fassbender also plays Walter, a more advanced robot, and is joined by Katherine Waterson, Danny McBride, Jussie Smollet, and Billy Crudup. The crew of the titular ship stumble across David, a survivor from a previous run-in with the Xenomorphs, and join forces with him to battle an altered version of the creature.“It’s the hardest thing to do,” said Scott of making people feel frightened at the movies. “Comedians will disagree, but I think it’s easier to make people laugh than to really, really scare the s— out of somebody. We’ve seen so ew much, we get a little bit numb to what should be scary. I’m not sure that’s a good thing.” He also addressed the complaints about Prometheus being too complicated and leaving too loose ends. ““All those things are answered: why and to what purpose they exist,” he said. “I’m scared about getting highbrow, but it raises questions of creationism and all that.”Whilst critical reviews of Covenant decried the film for falling back on old habits, they were mostly satisfied with the scares on hand. Previously ‘Alien’ films had been far too grand, a far cry from the confined terror of the original. This one returned the series to its roots; one monster, a group of underdog victims; a single location far from safety. However, the film underperformed at the box office, which might explain why it took another seven years for the franchise to make a return.That came in 2024 with the release of Alien: Romulus. Though Scott served as one of the producers on the project, directorial duties were handed over to Fede Álvarez. Romulus also received strong reviews and, crucially, was a much bigger success financially. According to Álvarez, Scott’s reaction to seeing the film was simple – “And then he walks into the room and he did say, ‘Fede, what can I say? It’s fucking great.”[embedded content]Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

The greatest movies never made: Brian De Palma, Robert Zemeckis, and Steven Spielberg’s ‘Carpool’ was ‘Rear Window’ on four wheels

(Credits: Far Out / Alamy / Press) Wed 15 January 2025 4:30, UK As far as dream teams go, they didn’t come much more impressive in the mid-1980s, or ever, than Brian De Palma, Steven Spielberg, and Robert Zemeckis.The first two had planted their feet firmly in the industry as part of the ‘New Hollywood’ era when the movie brats began to take over the industry and rework it in their own image. While Zemeckis wouldn’t make his feature-length directorial debut until 1978’s Beatles-inspired comedy I Wanna Hold Your Hand, he quickly found a career-long ally in Spielberg, who was already a friend of De Palma’s.The auteur behind Obsession, Carrie, Blow Out, Scarface and Body Double was already regarded as one of the most distinctive and provocative auteurs in Tinseltown, toeing the line between risque cinema and crowd-pleasing entertainment by delivering a string of critically and commercially successful features that refused to bow to convention yet still always managed to find an audience.Having reshaped the complexion of the business with Jaws, Spielberg continued going from strength to strength by helming Close Encounters of the Third Kind, launching one of the most popular franchises on the planet with Raiders of the Lost Ark, directing the highest-grossing release of all time once again with ET the Extra-Terrestrial, and segueing into producing, which proved to be very beneficial for Zemeckis.Spielberg executive produced his first film and its follow-up, Used Cars. He was also the one power player in Hollywood who backed Zemeckis and writing partner Bob Gale when they unsuccessfully pitched an ambitious sci-fi adventure called Back to the Future around town and were greeted with nothing but disinterest and rejection.To put things into context: in 1986, Zemeckis and Gale’s two most recent screenplays were Romancing the Stone and the first instalment in Michael J Fox’s time-bending trilogy; Spielberg was fresh from steering The Color Purple to 11 Academy Award nominations and lending his EP expertise to Richard Donner’s beloved The Goonies, and De Palma was gearing up for the Oscar-winning The Untouchables.Take three heavyweight talents at the top of their game, unite them on the same project, and have them put their heads together on a high-concept premise that was described as Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window on four wheels, and there was no chance the end result was going to be anything other than top tier.That was the plan, anyway, after it was announced in early 1986 that De Palma would wield the megaphone on Carpool, working from a script authored by Zemeckis and Gale, which had Spielberg on board to produce. Those three names alone were about as close to a guarantee of quality as anyone could hope to find when the triumvirate were all working on a level above almost anyone else, but it wasn’t to be.The Rear Window comparisons were incredibly apt, considering the cues it was set to take from Hitchcock’s masterpiece were less than subtle, but if Shia LaBeouf’s Disturbia can go to a court of law and prove that it’s not an unofficial remake after being sued, then Carpool wouldn’t have been in any danger of litigation.Body Double displayed De Palma’s knack for homaging the ‘Master of Suspense’, and the story was right up a similar street. The plot follows a man injured in a car crash who ends up witnessing a murder while waiting for the emergency services and authorities to attend to his predicament. Once his safety is secured, he mounts a one-man investigation into the killing the culprit has no idea he saw with his own eyes, dragging him into a web of mystery and danger that threatens to do a lot more damage to his wellbeing than an automotive incident.Post-Scarface De Palma, post-Color Purple Spielberg, and post-Back to the Future Zemeckis joining forces on Carpool had the potential to add yet another riveting slice of cinema to three individual filmographies that were already overflowing with excellence in the ’80s, only for the entire thing to go up in a puff of smoke.[embedded content]Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

The greatest movies never made: Brian De Palma, Robert Zemeckis, and Steven Spielberg’s ‘Carpool’ was ‘Rear Window’ on four wheels

(Credits: Far Out / Alamy / Press) Wed 15 January 2025 4:30, UK As far as dream teams go, they didn’t come much more impressive in the mid-1980s, or ever, than Brian De Palma, Steven Spielberg, and Robert Zemeckis.The first two had planted their feet firmly in the industry as part of the ‘New Hollywood’ era when the movie brats began to take over the industry and rework it in their own image. While Zemeckis wouldn’t make his feature-length directorial debut until 1978’s Beatles-inspired comedy I Wanna Hold Your Hand, he quickly found a career-long ally in Spielberg, who was already a friend of De Palma’s.The auteur behind Obsession, Carrie, Blow Out, Scarface and Body Double was already regarded as one of the most distinctive and provocative auteurs in Tinseltown, toeing the line between risque cinema and crowd-pleasing entertainment by delivering a string of critically and commercially successful features that refused to bow to convention yet still always managed to find an audience.Having reshaped the complexion of the business with Jaws, Spielberg continued going from strength to strength by helming Close Encounters of the Third Kind, launching one of the most popular franchises on the planet with Raiders of the Lost Ark, directing the highest-grossing release of all time once again with ET the Extra-Terrestrial, and segueing into producing, which proved to be very beneficial for Zemeckis.Spielberg executive produced his first film and its follow-up, Used Cars. He was also the one power player in Hollywood who backed Zemeckis and writing partner Bob Gale when they unsuccessfully pitched an ambitious sci-fi adventure called Back to the Future around town and were greeted with nothing but disinterest and rejection.To put things into context: in 1986, Zemeckis and Gale’s two most recent screenplays were Romancing the Stone and the first instalment in Michael J Fox’s time-bending trilogy; Spielberg was fresh from steering The Color Purple to 11 Academy Award nominations and lending his EP expertise to Richard Donner’s beloved The Goonies, and De Palma was gearing up for the Oscar-winning The Untouchables.Take three heavyweight talents at the top of their game, unite them on the same project, and have them put their heads together on a high-concept premise that was described as Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window on four wheels, and there was no chance the end result was going to be anything other than top tier.That was the plan, anyway, after it was announced in early 1986 that De Palma would wield the megaphone on Carpool, working from a script authored by Zemeckis and Gale, which had Spielberg on board to produce. Those three names alone were about as close to a guarantee of quality as anyone could hope to find when the triumvirate were all working on a level above almost anyone else, but it wasn’t to be.The Rear Window comparisons were incredibly apt, considering the cues it was set to take from Hitchcock’s masterpiece were less than subtle, but if Shia LaBeouf’s Disturbia can go to a court of law and prove that it’s not an unofficial remake after being sued, then Carpool wouldn’t have been in any danger of litigation.Body Double displayed De Palma’s knack for homaging the ‘Master of Suspense’, and the story was right up a similar street. The plot follows a man injured in a car crash who ends up witnessing a murder while waiting for the emergency services and authorities to attend to his predicament. Once his safety is secured, he mounts a one-man investigation into the killing the culprit has no idea he saw with his own eyes, dragging him into a web of mystery and danger that threatens to do a lot more damage to his wellbeing than an automotive incident.Post-Scarface De Palma, post-Color Purple Spielberg, and post-Back to the Future Zemeckis joining forces on Carpool had the potential to add yet another riveting slice of cinema to three individual filmographies that were already overflowing with excellence in the ’80s, only for the entire thing to go up in a puff of smoke.[embedded content]Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter