Many experts agree that AI lacks emotions and cannot replace human authors because it cannot create original content. At the Chennai International Book Fair, publishers and authors dismissed the notion that AI could replace human authors. They emphasized the human touch in creative works, underscoring AI’s inability to create anything truly original.
During a panel on global publishing trends, Firat Sunel, Turkey’s Ambassador to India and author, highlighted AI’s significant advances in generating content. However, he pointed out its limitations, stating that while AI can produce prose and stories, it lacks feelings and emotions essential for literary works. He described creativity as being far more complex than binary algorithms.
Aazhi Senthilnathan, founder-CEO of AI platform Ailaysa, agreed, stating that AI cannot generate new ideas but could be valuable for publishing tasks like translation and editing.
AI-Generated Content: A Replica of the Past
During a recent discussion, panelists emphasized that AI lacks emotions and cannot replace human authors in writing meaningful literary works. Simon De Jocas, founder of Publishers Without Borders, remarked that AI-generated books merely replicate existing human creations. Prashant Pathak, co-founder of the same organization and consultant for Italy-based Giunti Editore, added that human intelligence is limitless, unlike AI, which works within the confines of existing data. He warned about potential legal issues, such as copyright violations, if AI usage remains unregulated.
Christian Weiss of Germany’s Draupadi Verlag emphasized that AI cannot rival human creativity. He highlighted poetry and innovative writing as areas beyond AI’s reach. Weiss suggested introducing labels in books to clarify if the content was written by humans, AI, or both.
Military Uses of AI: A Supporting Role Only
The Chinese military has also recognized AI’s limitations. An article in the People’s Liberation Army Daily stressed that AI should enhance human decision-making, not replace it. The article emphasized AI’s inability to demonstrate self-awareness or accountability.
The PLA advocates for a model where human commanders retain control while AI assists in data analysis and execution. The military relies on AI for simulations and planning but insists final decisions rest with humans to prevent errors from AI’s black-box algorithms.
Even with advancements like autonomous missile defense, human oversight remains critical to ensure accountability and adaptability. The South China Morning Post reported that AI lacks the capacity for reflection or responsibility, underscoring the need for human judgment in military operations.
Across sectors, experts continue to call for regulations to address AI’s ethical and legal implications. While AI holds promise for augmenting human capabilities, it cannot replace the creativity, adaptability, and emotional intelligence of human decision-makers.
AI as a Tool, Not a Creator
AI is undeniably a powerful tool in content creation, translation, and publishing-related tasks. Its ability to process vast amounts of data and generate text has revolutionized industries. However, AI’s reliance on pre-existing information and algorithms confines it to repeating patterns. Creativity, on the other hand, involves breaking conventions, imagining the unimaginable, and innovating from scratch. This is why AI struggles with creating new ideas or groundbreaking literary works.
The publishing industry believes that AI lacks the emotions and cannot replace human authors, making it unsuitable for crafting emotionally resonant stories. Experts like Firat Sunel and Christian Weiss emphasize that emotions and human experiences are essential for writing stories or poetry. These qualities cannot be replicated by machines. AI cannot understand or express feelings, which limits its capacity to produce works that resonate deeply with readers. In this sense, AI is more of an efficient assistant than an independent creator.
This post was originally published on here
