Cairo International Book Fair attracts high public turnout

The Cairo International Book Fair has attracted a high number of visitors since its opening on Friday. Egypt’s Minister of Culture, Ahmed Fouad Hanno, toured the 56th edition of the fair on Saturday, praising the public turnout, particularly families. The fair continues until 5 February at the Egypt International Exhibition Centre in New Cairo.Organised by the Egyptian General Book Authority, headed by Ahmed Bahi Aldin, the fair’s theme is “Read… In the beginning was the Word.” The Minister’s tour included visits to several publisher and exhibitor pavilions, such as Al-Azhar, the Ministry of Defence, the Administrative Control Authority, and the Ministry of Culture. He also visited the discounted foreign books pavilion, a new addition organised in partnership with the Sharjah Book Authority.
Hanno expressed his satisfaction with the visitor numbers, describing the fair as a cultural and intellectual destination reflecting Egyptians’ love of culture. He stated that this edition embodies Egypt’s cultural standing and its leading role in promoting culture and knowledge, expressing hope for the fair’s continued success. The purpose of the Minister’s tour was to assess the fair’s operations and monitor services for publishers and visitors.
On Friday, the first day, the Ministry of Culture announced 400,942 attendees. Visitors flocked to the fairgrounds from the early hours to participate in cultural and artistic activities, and to purchase publications on diverse subjects from participating publishing houses and the Ministry of Culture’s pavilions. Egyptian families, along with Arab and international visitors, attended the opening day of the annual event.
This year, the Ministry of Culture launched the Million Books initiative, aiming to donate one million books across various categories and for different age groups throughout Egypt. This initiative aims to improve public awareness and cognitive skills.
The fair features 1,345 publishing houses from 80 countries and 6,150 exhibitors. New participating countries this year include Chile, Belgium, Congo, Bulgaria, and Austria, adding to the fair’s cultural diversity. The Sultanate of Oman is the guest of honour. Ahmed Mostagir, the Egyptian scholar and writer, has been named the fair’s personality of the year, while the children’s book fair personality is writer Fatima Al-Maadoul.
The fair’s theme, “Read.. was the word in the beginning,” draws inspiration from Islamic and Christian scriptures, highlighting reading’s importance. The slogan aims to encourage knowledge-seeking through reading, promoting a deeper understanding of oneself and the world, and fostering creativity and innovation. The Sultanate of Oman is also the Guest of Honour for this 56th edition. The fair’s Higher Advisory Committee selected the late scholar Aḥmad Mustajīr as the main personality of the fair and children’s writer Fatima Al-Maadoul as the Children’s Fair personality.
The Cairo International Book Fair offers diverse activities encompassing all fields of knowledge. These events are held in designated halls throughout the fairgrounds, including the Main Hall, the International Hall, the Cultural Salon, the Thought and Creativity Hall, the Poetry Hall, and the Presentation Hall. Activities for children and artistic events are also featured. Hundreds of writers and intellectuals from Egypt, Arab countries, and other nations are participating in the cultural programme, which includes over 600 diverse events. The fair welcomes visitors daily from 10:00 am to 8:00 pm, extending its hours to 9:00 pm on Thursdays and Fridays.

How to watch ‘The Perfect Setting’ Hallmark movie premiere

New Hallmark romance “The Perfect Setting” premieres Saturday, January 25 at 8 p.m. ET. Stream the movie for free with a Philo free trial.Hallmark Channel is also available via Fubo, Sling, DIRECTV Stream, and Hulu + Live TV.Laci J. Mailey and David Elsendoorn star in “The Perfect Setting,” premiering on the Hallmark Channel on Saturday, Jan. 25, 2025. ©2024 Hallmark MediaHallmark MediaAbout the movie:Starring Laci J. Mailey and David Elsendoorn, Hallmark’s “The Perfect Setting” follows Abby, an ambitious jewelry designer, to Belgium, where her grandfather has been awaiting her return. Also on the agenda: Win the Valentine’s Day Diamond Contest. But once back in the community she spent so much time visiting as a child, Abby meets and falls for Alexander, whose family happens to be in direct contrast with her own. “It’s a familiar tale,” says the Hallmark Channel trailer, comparing the story to that of “Romeo and Juliet.”Watch the premiere of “The Perfect Setting” tonight at 8/7c — streaming on Philo, Fubo, Sling, DIRECTV Stream, and Hulu + Live TV.Where to watch:Philo (start free trial) – For $28/month, ditch cable and unlock 70+ channels of reality TV, movies, and more. Click here to watch.Fubo (free trial) – As a limited-time offer, register and pay only $59.99 for your first month of FuboTV. After promotion, plans start at $84.99/month and include over 200 channels as well as a free trial. Subscribe here.Sling (try today) – For $60.99/month, unlock Sling Orange + Blue — 50+ channels including Freeform, Bravo, ESPN, FX, TLC, and more — or select Sling Orange and Sling Blue individually at $45.99/month. Click here to explore available Sling TV discounts.DIRECTV Stream (try it free) – Choose DIRECTV Stream to enjoy 75+ channels and numerous entertainment add-ons. Prices range from $86.99/month to $129.99/month. Compare plans here.Hulu + Live TV (3 days free) – For $95.99/month, choose Hulu + Live TV to stream shows, news, and sports as they air — plus access both Disney+ and ESPN+. Start a 3-day free trial here.Starring:Laci J. Mailey as AbbyDavid Elsendoorn as Alexander

Entrepreneur seeks investors to realise dream of cliff-top film studio in Dover

The 33-year-old has ploughed millions of pounds into transforming The Citadel into hotels, restaurants and laboratories.His plan for a world-renowned tourist and business destination includes a whisky distillery, wellness spa and a music and arts venue.Mr de Min and his business partners bought the 33-acre site from the Ministry of Justice three years ago for £1.8million.But he is now seeking new investors as his associates have decided to pull out of the ambitious project.“I was gutted when my partners said they wanted to sell. It threw it into chaos. I was heartbroken,” he said. “But I am now urging somebody to please come and join me on this adventure. We’ve made a great start but there is so much more to do. I need someone who shares my vision.”The oldest part of the fort – perched high on Dover’s famous White Cliffs, with a view of France 20 miles across the Channel – was built in 1775 and became the first line of defence against Napoleon Bona-parte and his naval fleet.It was later used as a military barracks in the Crimean War and both World Wars – but in 1956 the Citadel was handed over to the Prison Service. It served as a Young Offenders Institution until 2002 when it became an Immigration Detention Centre, before finally closing in 2015.Mr de Min said: “I believe this is one of the most exciting developments in Europe. It’s amazing.“My partners have seen an exit and are selling. That’s fair enough, it’s business, but it won’t stop me. It’s up for sale at £15million, and we are open to offers.“I’ve put blood, sweat and tears into this. It could be the next Pinewood Studios – we’ve already had some exciting filming taking place here.”

Emergency Box Office Collection Day 9: Kangana Ranaut’s movie sees a jump in business on Saturday, mints THIS amount

Emergency Box Office Collection Day 9: Kangana Ranaut’s movie sees a jump in business on Saturday, mints THIS amount | Today Newsvar _comscore = _comscore || [];_comscore.push({ c1:”2″, c2:”6035286″, options: {enableFirstPartyCookie: true, bypassUserConsentRequirementFor1PCookie:true }});( function() {var s = document.createElement(“script”), el = document.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0]; s.async = true; s.src = “https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/cs/6035286/beacon.js”; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el);})();SubscribeSign in

Commentary: Gierach books perfect for winter months

On cold, snowy days, I dig through my library of John Gierach books. I read them over and over. It’s both for entertainment and to admire the best of writing. There is never one wasted word, never anything out of place in a single sentence. It is prose. I often read a paragraph a second time to let it marinate. They are trout fishing books, mainly a series of short stories about his great trips. I ache to fish those streams, perhaps because he paints the picture so well. My favorite author passed away in the fall. He left behind over 20 books, each stand alone works. You can start anywhere in any of them and be happy.  I have them all, some of them in duplicate because I found a place near his home in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains that sells autographed hardback copies.  So I mailed two of the paperbacks to a willing reader, my Fayetteville friend Bill Eldridge. He is not a fly fisher, but he’s going to love them because they are written wonderfully well. Bill is a voracious reader. I know he will appreciate Gierach’s work, both in style and technical ability to tell a story. He is also a storyteller. Gierach’s work includes humor, common sense and great thoughts on river characters, typical trout bums like me. “Trout Bum” was the first of John’s books. It was given to me when I had my first knee scope. Daughter Sarah found it at the local bookstore for me to read while I lay in bed with my knee in ice. I can’t thank her enough for turning me onto Gierach’s marvelous writings.  To my delight, I learned Gierach had already written several more. I quickly devoured those, too. About once a year another was produced. Sometimes Sarah found them first and they became wonderful birthday presents. “Trout Bum” made Gierach famous and he was in demand at book signings and to speak at Trout Unlimited dinners or fly tying conventions. That first book was good, but as some of us do, he got better and a little braver in style as he aged. I think his latest works are his best.  Maybe he just needed to hit his stride. I apologize for saying that about him, but his last books are really grand. There was one terrific book just before he passed. Ironically, it’s “All the Time in the World.” John didn’t have much time left when he sent it to Simon & Schuster. One of my favorites is “Fishing Bamboo.” My friend David Knowles, famous for fishing split cane bamboo fly rods, gifted it to me. I’ve read it over 20 times. It’s not long. It details the ins and outs of the great vintage bamboo fly rods that I so love to fish and collect. I admit to owning over 20 bamboo rods. The book is pure gold.  It covers rod history and many of the classic makers, including some about Mike Clark. Clark builds bamboo rods in Lyons, Colo., and was perhaps John’s best friend. You can — and I’ve done it three times — walk right into Mike’s shop, South Creek Limited, and both meet Clark and buy hardbacks of John’s many books, all autographed. Clark will chat about Gierach or discuss a rod that you wanted him to see. Two years ago when Kristopher Bouldin and I were in that area for an elk hunt, we took a day off to visit Clark. Bouldin was fishing a Wright & McGill bamboo rod in our afternoons. Mike asked him to retrieve it from the truck. He cleaned it and straightened the tip section. You can do that with some heat, but only a rod maker should try it. That was fun to watch. Clark once worked in the Wright & McGill shop. His daughter dated the rod at 1951 and Clark agreed. He might have worked on it. Clark had the 25th anniversary edition of “Trout Bum” for sale. It has a new foreword about John, plus notes to Gierach from about six or seven famous outdoor writers. It’s pretty cool. So I had to buy that hardback version of “Trout Bum.” It didn’t hurt that it was autographed. There is generally a chapter about bamboo rods in each of John’s books. I’ll read those chapters over and over. There is a great chapter like that in his last book named “Whistling Gophers.” The highlight in the second paragraph discusses what it’s like to be fishing a collectible vintage bamboo fly rod (maybe 75 years old) on a stream and somebody stops on a gravel bar to admire it. They’ll ask what “one of those might go for?” When you tell them, John writes, they respond with a whistle. I’ve had that happen to me on the Frying Pan River near Basalt, Colo. last summer. I fish the Frying Pan because Gierach often wrote about it, sometimes mentioning that Clark was along for the week. The photo that you see with this column is a gorgeous brown trout in my net caught while fishing solo near the dam on the upper end of the Frying Pan. The fly is a size 22 ruby midge that I tied. This borders on bragging, but I make no apology. It was great fun. You can buy a midge just like it that I tied in a box that will be auctioned at the two Trout Unlimited dinners coming soon. The Mountain Home event is Feb. 15 at the Elks Lodge. The Fayetteville chapter will host a dinner on March 1 at the Towne Center. I would recommend all of the Gierach books, outside of “Fishing Bamboo” because it would be far too technical for most, although remarkably well done. I will warn you if you are into fly fishing and you read “Fishing Bamboo,” you may suddenly go down the rabbit hole like I did to never come out. I spend way too much time on Ebay looking for Wright & McGill or Granger bamboo fly rods made in the 40s and 50s. I recently paid too much for one that still had the plastic wrapper on the cork grip and in the original sock. It’s probably from 1950.  I have a catalog that details the style and color of wraps on the vintage bamboo rods so that I can date them and actually restore them. Yes, I’m in way too deep. I’ll probably strip the plastic off the grip and fish it, although that will immediately reduce the value of the rod by half. It’s sort of like when you put that classic Corvette on the road and start getting some dings in the fender. You ought to drive it, but you also are impacting the car’s worth. I don’t care. The bamboo rod makers meant for you to fish them, not make them wall art. I do both, sometimes rotating them from the back seat of my truck onto the wall in my study. It’s a good time of year – in between books and tying flies – to put an old friend back into the fishing rotation.

The Cancelled Stargate Movie That Would Have Brought Every Show Together

MGM Television

When Roland Emmerich made his 1994 sci-fi adventure “Stargate,” he likely never envisioned the sprawling media saga that would follow. In fact, after the film proved a modest success at the box office, there was talk of making a whole “Stargate” trilogy. Instead, Brad Wright and Jonathan Glassner took on the task of continuing the story begun by Emmerich. The pair oversaw “Stargate SG-1,” a TV show that launched in 1997 and revolved around the same team from the movie, following their exploits across the universe as they explore strange alien worlds using the Stargate portal. Kurt Russell might’ve refused to reprise his lead role as Colonel Jack O’Neill for the franchise’s small-screen continuation, but Wright and Glassner had “MacGuyver” star Ricard Dean Anderson to help propel their series to success. Indeed, the show proved a cult hit, lasting for 10 seasons before the Sci-Fi channel (now SyFy) cancelled “SG-1” in 2007.

But that wasn’t the end of the “Stargate” story. During its time on-air, “SG-1” spawned a couple of spin-offs, most notably with the live-action series “Stargate Atlantis,” which debuted in 2004. The animated series “Stargate Infinity” also began airing during the “SG-1” years, though some fans don’t consider this canon. Even after “SG-1” was cancelled, the franchise kept coming back with two direct-to-TV films and more live-action series in the form of 2009’s “Stargate Universe” and 2018’s “Stargate Origins.”
Following the cancellation of “Stargate Universe” in 2010, however, the whole saga was left in limbo as the series ended on a cliffhanger that seemed doomed to remain unresolved. While comic books have since tried to continue the story, they haven’t involved the series’ creators. But had Wright gotten his way, we would have at least seen “Universe,” “Atlantis,” and “SG-1” wrapped up a lot more neatly via a movie that was shelved before it even had a chance to get underway.

Season 2 of Stargate Universe ended on a cliffhanger that was never resolved

MGM Television

Today, the “Stargate” empire comprises Roland Emmerich’s film, multiple TV series and direct-to-home-media movies, and a slew of comics, video games, and books. With such a vast expanse of media, watching the “Stargate” franchise in order has become a confusing prospect to say the least, especially when there are unresolved storylines involved. But “SG-1” co-creator Brad Wright, who went on to co-create “Atlantis” and “Universe,” at least had plans to wrap up his contribution to the “Stargate”-verse somewhat cleanly.

While “Stargate SG-1” and “Stargate: Atlantis” both focused on teams that used the eponymous portal device to traverse the universe, “Stargate Universe,” oddly enough, was a much different series. It followed a research crew stranded aboard the spacecraft Destiny as they tried to find a way back across billions of light years to Earth. Led by scientist Dr. Nicholas Rush (Robert Carlyle), the crew was sent on a research initiative to investigate ways of allowing travel across remote distances utilizing the Stargate. But after a planet exploded, members of the group used a wormhole to escape, landing them aboard the derelict Destiny. Season 2 sees crew member Eli Wallace (David Blue) propose a void jump, which would see the group use pods to enter stasis for three years in order to complete the journey. Although they go ahead with the plan, one of the pods proves to be faulty, leaving the group to decide who should stay outside and try to fix the pod with only two weeks before they would have to shut off life support. Eli claims to have the best chance of fixing the pod and therefore stays out of stasis before the season 2 finale closes with him watching the stars from the ship’s observation deck.

Sadly, the show was unceremoniously cancelled before it could reveal whether Eli fixed the pod in time to survive, leaving fans to wonder what “Stargate Universe” season 3 could have been. Well, had Wright been given the greenlight for his ambitious movie project, we would have found out.

The Stargate film that never was

MGM Television

Even before the season 2 finale of “Stargate Universe” aired on May 9, 2011, the series had been cancelled, with SyFy announcing on December 16, 2010 that it had not picked up the series for a third season. Though a non-canon “Stargate Universe” comic series from Mark L. Haynes and J.C. Vaughn attempted to carry on the story after “Universe” season 2, we never got an official continuation.

But Brad Wright at least tried to come up with a last-minute solution when he learned “Universe” was ending prematurely — one that would have united all three live-action “Stargate” shows (at the time, “Origins” had not been created). Speaking to GateWorld in 2023, Wright revealed that he pitched production company MGM Television on the idea, which would have seen characters from “SG-1” and “Atlantis” return to rescue the crew of Destiny from “Universe,” giving the franchise, as it existed at the time, a proper send-off. The co-creator explained he “just started typing” and implored MGM to let him use existing sets from “Stargate” for the project before they were dismantled. Wright recalled his approach:

“If I can get a script in your hands quickly enough, I bet I can get the cast of ‘SGU’ and bring aboard enough cast members from the other show that I could at least give us a two-hour movie to wrap it up, or a 90-minute movie to wrap up ‘SGU’ and finish the story that we were trying to tell.”

Alas, the fate of Wright’s section of the “Stargate” universe was sealed.

Brad Wright’s scrapped film wasn’t fully fleshed out

MGM Television

As Brad Wright remembered in his GateWorld interview, his initial idea was fairly crude. However, there was the seed of a storyline that involved using David Hewlett’s Dr. Meredith Rodney McKay — an “SG–1” character who was a last minute replacement in “Stargate Atlantis” and who went on to appear in 100 episodes of the series:

“I pitched him the rough idea that I had for it — and it was rough. I mean, I was typing as fast as I could. I didn’t whiteboard it. I just had this structure in my head and concept for the characters from the other series that I was going to bring in. And I started laying it out, and it started with McKay and began [with a] recognition that Destiny was in trouble.”

Lamentably, Wright wasn’t even able to put together a proper first draft of the script before MGM pulled the plug. “Like two weeks into the process I found out it’s not gonna happen,” Wright said. “There comes a time where the desire to finish something doesn’t line up with the financial resources to do it. And that was where it was already heading when I found out they’re not interested.”

As SyFy has noted, the DVD market had taken a downturn at the time Wright was pitching his movie, which likely played into MGM’s decision not to move forward with the project. Considering SyFy had already cancelled “Universe” after just two seasons anyway, I can’t imagine the prospect of a movie based on the series was ever all that enticing to begin with — at least not for MGM or the network. For fans, however, the fact Wright’s vision never came to fruition will remain as tragic a moment in the vast “Stargate” saga as Eli’s decision to stay behind for the sake of his fellow crew members.

35 Years Ago, A Box Office Bomb Spawned A Beloved Monster Movie Franchise

Universal Pictures

(Welcome to Tales from the Box Office, our column that examines box office miracles, disasters, and everything in between, as well as what we can learn from them.)
“When my agent called me up and said ‘giant worms underground’ I was like, ‘Oh my God. My career is in the toilet.'” Those are the words of Kevin Bacon, star of “Tremors,” reflecting on his role in the now-beloved monster movie in the 2020 documentary “Making Perfection.” While that is a wild pitch and, admittedly, the movie was not a big hit in its day, it by no means wound up in the toilet. On the contrary, it kickstarted one of the most surprisingly enduring franchises in the genre landscape. Sometimes, big things have humble beginnings.

This journey begins with screenwriters S.S. Wilson and Brent Maddock, who met in college and quickly became writing partners. They broke out in Hollywood with the unexpected success of the 1986 family-friendly sci-fi flick “Short Circuit.” Once some hot new filmmakers hit it big, it’s always about what’s next. For this duo, it involved dusting off an old idea about giant underground worms. The result? An eventual classic, yes. But it sure as heck didn’t feel like a classic in the early going. And yet, the money — and the fandom — did follow.
In this week’s Tales from the Box Office, we’re looking back at “Tremors” in honor of its 35th anniversary. We’ll go over how the movie came to be, why it became difficult to secure a release date, what happened once it hit theaters, what happened in the years after its initial release, and what lessons we can learn from it all these years later. Let’s dig in, shall we?

The movie: Tremors

Universal Pictures

The movie as we know it centers on Val McKee (Bacon) and Earl Basset (Fred Ward) who decide to leave the very tiny town of Perfection, Nevada, to start a new life elsewhere. However, strange rumblings in the desert prevent their attempts to flee. A seismology student helps them discover that their desolate town is infested with giant creatures that live below the ground, which come to be called Graboids. The people of the town are forced to band together to survive.

When the script was pulled from the drawer of ideas, it was called “Land Sharks.” Quite probably because that was a character on “Saturday Night Live,” the title was eventually changed to “Tremors.” Universal Pictures snatched the rights to the project, with a then-unknown Ron Underwood signing on to direct. As for the origins of the idea? Wilson, writing on Stampede Entertainment’s official website explained:

“I had a job working as an editor at a navy base in the middle of the Mojave Desert. On weekends, when they weren’t shooting at the gunnery ranges, I was allowed to go hiking out there. One day when climbing over large boulders exactly like those in Tremors, off of which the people pole vault, I had a thought. ‘What if something was under the ground and I couldn’t get off this rock?'”

That idea was now becoming a major motion picture, one that ended up with an $11 million budget. On the one hand, that’s a relatively low-budget affair for a studio like Universal. Low-budget movies can be a low-risk, high-reward proposition. Once marketing is factored in, not to mention accounting for inflation and what that would look like in today’s dollars, it was still a sizable risk to take on an out-there idea with an untested director.

Tremors was an outside-the-box gamble for Universal

Universal Pictures

From the casting of “Family Ties” star Michael Gross as the gun-toting Burt Gummer to constructing expensive, giant mechanical sandworms, the studio was not only taking a gamble on “Tremors,” but they were allowing these untested filmmakers to think outside the box. Mind you, this was years before Steven Spielberg’s “Jurassic Park” combined practical effects with CGI to carve a path for the future of filmmaking. All of the Graboid shots had to be done practically. That was no easy task, particularly on a small budget.

Creatively speaking, finding the tone of the film was tough. The casting of Gross, a man known as a straight-and-narrow dad on TV, as a gun nut, speaks to that. Wilson and Maddock had an issue finding a balance between the horror and the comedy. Speaking on the Stampede Entertainment Q&A board, Wilson explained how they settled on the tone in the final script:

“It started as a sort of homage to ’50s horror, but the first drafts kept getting more and more funny as we came up with jokes. Later in the process (we did seven drafts), we felt that the comedy was ruining the scary moments, so we began taking jokes out until we ended up with only comedic moments that arose naturally out of the situation. It became a scary movie with genuinely funny moments. Ultimately that hurt it when it went to theaters.”

Indeed, Universal had a horror/comedy with a solid cast and great practical creature effects, but one that they didn’t exactly know how to market. It also didn’t help that, initially, when the film was rated by the MPAA, it received an R. Mind you, this was decades before movies like “Deadpool” would prove that R-rated movies could also be legitimate blockbusters. The film was delayed from its original November 1989 release to allow some changes to get it down to a PG-13, such as removing uses of the F-bomb. Unfortunately, the delay and the lowered rating didn’t help the picture’s commercial prospects.

The financial journey

[embedded content]

January has, for years, been considered something of a dump month in Hollywood. It’s not when studios bring their A-game, generally speaking. The big draw is often Oscar season movies expanding into more theaters, while stuff studios don’t know what to do with otherwise enters the fray. Enter “Tremors,” which hit theaters on January 19, 1990. Even in the original trailer, it was evident that the studio wasn’t sure how to market the film. Lean into the comedy? Or push it as a straight-up horror show?

On opening weekend, it was crystal clear that this confused marking didn’t exactly resonate with the general public. Despite being the only new wide release that weekend, “Tremors” opened at number five on the charts, taking in just $3.7 million. It scarcely did better than eventual Best Picture winner “Driving Miss Daisy,” which made $2.6 million in its sixth weekend on far fewer screens.
Even though the film didn’t drop very hard the following week, that low opening weekend killed its chances of breaking out. By mid-February, it was out of the top ten entirely. “The head of Universal did call me and said, ‘Well, we just blew it,'” Wilson recalled in “Making Perfection.”
All told, “Tremors” made just $16.6 million domestically, with virtually no international grosses to speak of. Or, at the very least, those grosses weren’t widely reported. In those days, the overseas box office wasn’t quite as important, or as widely circulated, as it is now. The film was a straight-up bomb in its original run. Fortunately, it would go on to find new life later that year.

Tremors became a franchise – thanks to the golden era of home video

Universal Pictures

The VHS boom of the late ’80s and early ’90s gave Hollywood a new revenue source. It also acted as a bit of an insurance policy. If a movie fails at the box office, it just might find its audience on home video instead. Such was the case with “Tremors,” which rapidly shot to the top ten on the video rentals charts after its VHS release. That’s where its reputation blossomed.

It wasn’t long before Universal realized there was money to be made with a sequel. That took the form of “Tremors 2: Aftershocks” in 1996. Though originally conceived as a theatrical release, it shifted to the home video department at the studio. In the production notes for the film, it’s explained that the love for the first movie had grown so much that craftspeople were willing to work at a reduced rate just to make sure the sequel happened.

“There were so many actors and technical experts in the industry that wanted to see this film made, that everyone started lowering their rates and devising creative ways to cut corners. The film got the green light for production at just under 4 million dollars. That is under a third of the original ‘Tremors’ budget of 11 million.”

“Aftershocks” was also a hit, leading to another sequel, “Back to Perfection,” in 2001. We then got a prequel, “The Legend Begins” in 2004 before the series took a long break. In 2015, it was revived with “Bloodlines,” paving the way for a new trilogy including 2018’s “A Cold Day in Hell” and 2020’s “Shrieker Island,” which was sort of positioned as an ending to the franchise. Gross’ Burt Gummer anchored nearly every one of these sequels, even appearing as one of the character’s ancestors in the prequel.
“Most people don’t realize that it wasn’t a successful movie,” Bacon mused in “Making Perfection.” Even I must admit, in doing my research for this very column, I was a little shocked to see just how bad the budget-to-box-office ratio was in its initial run.

The lessons contained within

Universal Pictures

35 years and seven films later, it’s safe to say that this franchise is beloved. The original has since been given releases on just about every format imaginable, including a 4K release from Arrow Video several years back. Not bad for a bomb that seemed dead on arrival.

“Part of the reason I think it didn’t do as well when it came out was the horror films at that time were very dark, very scary,” Underwood later said of “Tremors” upon reflection. “This film was lighter because it had people that you cared about who had a lightness to them and a sense of humor despite the awful situation they were in.”
Looking back now, it’s truly a shame that this would almost certainly not happen in today’s climate. DVD isn’t totally dead, but the home video market isn’t what it once was. Movies run the risk of being lost in the streaming algorithm. Studios don’t have a lot of patience these days and if something doesn’t work after its first couple of weekends, they write it off and move on.

One can only hope that VOD could, in theory, save the next “Tremors” from a grim fate. The one thing that can be helped is that Hollywood studios can try to think of things on a longer timeline. That is, admittedly, easy for a guy with no skin in the game to say. To quote Earl Bassett, “You never plan ahead, you never take the long view, I mean here it is Monday and I’m already thinking of Wednesday … It is Monday right?”

The Only Time Denzel Washington Felt Scared Shooting A Movie

Universal Pictures

When Denzel Washington committed to starring in “Training Day,” it must have been a vertiginous moment for the actor. But it’s not because the movie itself was a risk, or that he was concerned about his ability to play his role. Rather, this 2011 crime thriller marked the first time Washington played a bad guy — a fact that made his casting in “Training Day” surprisingly controversial. Having become a megastar, winning an Oscar, and earning the respect of audiences and his peers, Denzel suddenly found himself faced with a significant task: proving naysayers wrong by effectively portraying an on-screen villain after two decades of playing the good guy.

Luckily, the ever-capable star proved he was more than up to the task. His performance as corrupt LAPD detective Alonzo Harris is one of the greatest performances of his career and secured Washington a second Oscar win as a result. That by itself would be impressive, but when you consider what went into making “Training Day,” it becomes even more unbelievable.
Rather than shooting on soundstages, director Antoine Fuqua decided to film “Training Day” on-location in Los Angeles. This is a film that takes extensive detours into some of the city’s more disadvantaged neighborhoods, which meant that Fuqua and co. were essentially shooting in gang territory for much of the movie. While you might think that this added to Washington’s already extensive worries, it seems the veteran star remained clear-headed throughout. In fact, he never once worried for his safety while filming “Training Day.” His previous film, however, was the first and only time Denzel has actually been scared while shooting a movie.

Training Day didn’t phase Denzel Washington

Warner Bros.

By all accounts, Denzel Washington had a ball shooting “Training Day,” going off-script and improvising his way through one of his best ever performances. At no point do you get the sense that he was intimidated by the project, his first time playing a villain, or by working with real gang members in real gang neighborhoods. The actor once told the Morning Call as much, too, when asked about the potentially dangerous shooting conditions on “Training Day.” Not only did Washington state that he “never felt a sense of danger,” he actually recalled how welcome he felt in LA’s Imperial Courts housing project, saying:

“I met a number of [gang members] and they all said, ‘Oh, you’ve got to meet my mom.’ And the moms would come over and give me a hug and say, ‘Denzel, we need to make you something to eat right now.’ I did go over to one of their houses and had a nice meal. Someone told me later on, ‘That was the head guy’s mom. You’re in over there now.'”

So, if shooting in a location notorious for its gang activity didn’t phase Denzel, then what did? Well, his previous film, “The Hurricane” managed to unnerve the actor somewhat. In the 1999 biopic, Denzel played real-life boxer Rubin “Hurricane” Carter, who was wrongly convicted of murder in 1966 before being sent to prison for 20 years. It’s one of Denzel Washington’s most rewatchable films, and it also happens to be the one time the actor felt a real sense of danger on-set.

Shooting The Hurricane made Denzel feel a sense of danger

Universal Pictures

While “The Hurricane” is ostensibly a sports drama based on Rubin Carter’s real life, most of the movie plays out in prison, where Denzel Washington’s Carter spends his time trying to prove his innocence while an enterprising young Brooklynite named Lesra Martin (Vicellous Reon Shannon) commits himself to exonerating the wrongly-convicted boxer.

Much like Antoine Fuqua with “Training Day,” “The Hurricane” director Norman Jewison decided that his movie would benefit from shooting on location. That meant that Denzel was placed inside East Jersey State Prison (formerly “Rahway State Prison”) — the very same facility that housed Carter himself 15 years prior. While the maximum security prison no doubt lent authenticity to the film, it also managed to instill fear into the typically unflappable Washington. The actor told the Morning Call that while “Training Day” was a comparative breeze, “When we shot ‘Hurricane’ at the [East Jersey] State Prison [in Rahway], and they locked the doors behind me, that’s when I experienced a sense of danger.”

Still, it’s not as if this sense of danger held back the actor, who had Rubin Carter’s real example to guide him. As Washington once told the Tampa Bay Times, “This is a tough, tough man. Some of the prison guards talked about it when we were filming at Rahway [State Prison]. Those older guys told us they never broke [Rubin]. They said everybody gets broken in this penitentiary, but not him.”

The Director With The Most Perfect Movies, According To Metacritic

RKO Radio Pictures

There are only so many directors in the annals of cinema who audiences know by name. Yes, movie buffs can rattle off the names of plenty of filmmakers, from Guillermo del Toro to David Lean and many, many others in between. But for regular audience members, there’s only a few who earn the same name recognition of big-deal movie stars. Currently, there may only be four: Steven Spielberg, Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and Martin Scorsese. Think all you like about these auteurs, but they’ve made so many excellent, memorable, iconic films that audiences know their work and their names so well you can just list out their surnames. 

However, due to the fact that all of these men continue to make films in the era of review aggregation online, and because there are so many critics from which to select when you visit sites like Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes, it’s all but impossible for any of them to have a perfect movie by those sites’ standards. It’s especially difficult with Metacritic, seeing as that site is more selective about which critics and outlets it aggregates, combined with the fact that the reviews it aggregates are defined by their specific score. If your review is positive, that’s not enough; a perfect score would have to be a truly perfect score. Case in point: Spielberg’s highest-rated film on the site is “Schindler’s List” with a 95. Tarantino has the same score for his 1994 classic “Pulp Fiction.” Nolan’s highest-rated film is “Dunkirk” with a 94, while Scorsese ranks highest among the quartet thanks to his 1973 drama “Mean Streets” netting a 96. 

Be that as it may, there’s one director who boasts not just one but several “perfect” movies on Metacritic, and he’s undeniably one of the most famous of all time: Alfred Hitchcock. And honestly? You might be a bit surprised by the films of his with that elusive 100.

According to Metacritic, Alfred Hitchcock directed three ‘perfect’ movies

Paramount Pictures

Hitchcock is one of the most iconic filmmakers of all time, not least because he so effectively and consistently harnessed suspense in his films. But Hitch was also recognizable to audiences because he made himself so, both in introducing episodes of his anthology TV series and through the cameos he would make in his own films. And what films he made, of course! Both before and after he made the jump to the United States from England, Hitchcock was delivering amazing, tense, and captivating films that have helped establish a groundwork for future adventure, thriller, and horror movies. As noted above, he’s also got the most films with a perfect 100 on Metacritic — three of his films have that ranking on the website.

Off the top of your head, you may have a few films in mind when you think of Hitchcock’s greatest work. First and foremost would have to be his 1960 horror film “Psycho,” and not just because it features one of the most unforgettable death scenes of all time, wherein the winsome Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) is stabbed to death in the shower by a mysterious and seemingly female attacker. “Psycho” is also an expert case in horror and suspense thanks to that scene and several others. But as excellent as the film is, it only has a “measly” 97 on Metacritic.
Okay, fine, let’s rewind just a year to Hitchcock’s slam-bang adventure/thriller “North by Northwest,” which starred his longtime collaborator Cary Grant. That 1959 film is a quintessential example of one of Hitch’s favorite tropes: a case of mistaken identity. In that movie, a raffish New Yorker is accused of murder and has to go on the run across the country to clear his name. And like “Psycho,” it boasts a cinematic image that has burned into so many of our brains, as Grant attempts to outrun a murderous crop-dusting plane in the middle of an otherwise empty cornfield. It’s a great, exciting film and one of Hitchcock’s best … and it also doesn’t have 100 on Metacritic, coming in at 98 instead. In that case, how about the director’s influential 1963 horror film “The Birds”? That, too, is a movie filled with eerie undertones, memorable scenes, and it doesn’t even have a perfect score on MC. Alas, it only scored a 90.

No, the three “perfect” Hitchcock films according to the website are — drumroll, please — “Vertigo, “Notorious,” and “Rear Window.”

Hitchcock has more than just three ‘perfect’ films

Paramount Pictures

We could say that context is key, to be fair. We could also note that the Metacritic pages for both “Notorious” — the 1946 thriller in which a soused widower is coerced by a federal agent to help take down a Nazi in post-World War II America — and “Rear Window” — the 1954 thriller about a man who, while laid up from a recent injury, seems to spy on a murder going on in the apartment building across from his own — each have fewer than 20 reviews aggregated. It’s likewise true that most newer releases have at least 30 or so scored reviews. Then again, “Vertigo” has 32 reviews on its page, and that 1958 psychological thriller (which revolves around a haunted ex-cop who falls in love with the woman he’s supposed to be tailing) also has a 100 on Metacritic. The surprise to take away here is less that Alfred Hitchcock has three films with perfect scores on the website or that these are the lucky recipients of the 100. (For this writer, only “Vertigo” and “Notorious” are truly perfect, but none of them are creative slouches.) It’s that … well, Hitchcock only has three perfect films on the site? It ought to be a lot more than that.

That said, it’s worth noting that the three films with 100 are all excellent encapsulations of both Hitchcock’s personal predilections and his creative style. “Rear Window” and “Vertigo” each lean heavily into a voyeuristic streak that Hitchcock loved to indulge. (Think of the scene in “Psycho” where Anthony Perkins’ Norman Bates — at a point where we know very little about who he really is — spies on Marion Crane while she’s undressing.) “Vertigo” also boasts stylish use of Technicolor and unique dream sequences that speak to the main character’s haunted psyche. Elsewhere, “Notorious” blends Hitchcock’s love of intense romances (with Ingrid Bergman never looking lovelier than she does here) with his willingness as director to have high-intensity demands of his leading ladies, with Grant’s federal agent serving as a kind of self-critical stand-in for the director. 

Basically, if you had to go by Metacritic to decide which films to check out first from this unmitigated master, these three would be the perfect place to start. Sites like Metacritic don’t always seem to reflect audience perception, but when it comes to a filmmaker like Alfred Hitchcock, it got it perfect in this case.

Egypt To Be Guest Of Honour At Venezuela International Book Fair: Villegas

(MENAFN- Daily News Egypt) Egypt will be the guest of honour at the upcoming Venezuela International book Fair (FILVEN) in July. This honour coincides with the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries. Venezuelan Culture Minister Ernesto Villegas, fresh from presenting his book Maja Mia at the Cairo International Book Fair on Saturday, shared details of the upcoming cultural exchange.

“We are extremely pleased that Egypt has accepted to be our country’s guest of honour at the International Book Fair in Venezuela,” Villegas told Daily News Egypt.“The fair, obviously, is a book fair, but it is a very good excuse for all arts and all culture to be present in Venezuela, not only in July, but throughout the year.”

The fair will extend beyond the capital, reaching all states within Venezuela.“The fair will be held in all the states of the country, so it is a great opportunity to get closer from the point of view of culture,” Villegas stated, reiterating his enthusiasm for Egypt’s participation:“We are very happy that Egypt has accepted to be our country’s guest of honour at the International Book Fair in Venezuela, not only in July, but throughout the year.”

He expressed confidence that the anniversary year“will serve to raise the level of cultural exchange between the two countries.” He added,“Our Venezuelan Ambassador to Cairo Wilmer Omar Barrientos is a very dynamic ambassador, and Ambassador of Egypt in Caracas Kareem Amin and the Deputy Head of Mission Mohammad Abdelwahab are also very dynamic.”

Villegas participated in the 54th Cairo International Book Fair on Saturday, presenting his book Maja Mia. The book, written in homage to the centenary of his mother’s birth, Maja Poljak, explores her life against the backdrop of 20th and 21st-century world events.

“It is a book not only about the life of a person but about the life of humanity, with its emotional, funny aspects, with which you can laugh out loud and you can also cry,” Villegas explained. He described his mother’s life as a“guiding thread” through significant historical moments, including World War II, which led her to Venezuela. The research for the book also uncovered lesser-known aspects of Venezuelan history, such as the presence of the Nazi party, Jewish immigration, and the political landscape of the 1940s.
Reflecting on his mother’s Jewish heritage, Villegas drew parallels to the contemporary Palestinian experience.“My mother was Jewish, and the suffering of the Jews of that time is mirrored in the suffering of the Palestinians.” Villegas expressed his solidarity with the Palestinian people and Arab nations, recalling his meeting with Palestinian representatives at the Cairo book fair.

Villegas acknowledged Egyptian university professor and friend, Mohamed Morsi’s support during the book’s creation, stating,“Well, the truth is I have a lot to thank Dr Morsi for, because last year I didn’t come to present the book, but he was already aware of the process of its creation, even though it was still in its early stages. I don’t know if there’s a precedent for a book being discussed at a fair even before it was published. All of that is thanks to Dr Morsi.”

Villegas expressed his happiness to present the book to Morsi and the Egyptian people, noting his intention to release an Arabic translation in the coming year.“With these corrections, I intend to translate it into Arabic and other languages. Because, God willing, next year we will be able to come here with this book translated into Arabic. Thank you, Egypt, for all these emotions. Emotions that are reciprocated with Venezuela. And we hope to present more and more books in Venezuelan and Egyptian languages in Venezuela.”

Looking ahead to the FILVEN event, Villegas expressed high expectations:“We are honoured that Egypt accepted to be a guest of honour at the International Book Fair in Venezuela in July of this year. We have great expectations for the brilliance of this event. We are sure that this event will strengthen the ties between our countries and countries. Not at any time in human history, but at this very moment.”
He emphasised the importance of cultural exchange in fostering unity and understanding:“This means that all lovers of peace can meet. With our differences and particularities, we are invited by history to unite, without losing our own physiognomy, so that we can act positively in a world like this. So, from culture, and particularly from books and reading, we are taking the right steps in the right direction.”
MENAFN25012025000153011029ID1109128741