Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 vs Singham Again box office clash: Ajay’s film earns Rs 43 crore against Kartik Aaryan’s Rs 35 crore

Diwali 2024 will set an example for Indian cinema by showing that two movies of different genres can coexist and break box office records. Kartik Aaryan in Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, Ajay Devgn in Singham AgainThis year’s Diwali has become an example in Bollywood. Two movies of different genres and highly-anticipated sequels clashed on the same day, but both took a monstrous start at the box office, making new and breaking old box office records. Kartik Aryan’s horror-comedy Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 and Ajay Devgn’s actioner Singham Again were released on November 1, and they both celebrated Diwali with a bang. 

Despite getting mixed reviews, both films, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 and Singham Again earned huge because of the audience support. Industry tracker portal Sacnilk shared the Day 1 box office collection of both films. And to much relief, BB3 and Singham 3 have brought Rs 79 crores collectively. Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 earned Rs 35.50 crores opening, despite getting fewer screens than Singham. On the other side, Ajay’s Singham led the Diwali race by earning Rs 10 crores more than Kartik’s film and earned Rs 43.50 crores. For the unversed, Singham Again’s advance booking opened a day later than BB3, yet the film performed exceedingly well thanks to positive word of mouth, Rohit Shetty and Ajay Devgn’s impressive track record, and the brand Singham. 

Kartik Aaryan and Vidya Balan discussing Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, Akshay Kumar in Bhool Bhulaiyaa 4, clash with Singham Again

[embedded content]

Records made by Singham Again and Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 has become the highest opener of Kartik Aaryan’s director, Anees Bazmee. BB3 also scored the third-biggest opening for Bollywood in 2024 after Stree 2 and Singham Again and the second-biggest opening for a horror-comedy after Stree 2. 

Singham Again has also made records of Ajay Devgn’s highest opening, Rohit Shetty’s highest opening, the highest opening in Rohit Shetty Cop Universe after Sooryavanshi, and the second biggest opening of 2024 after Stree 2. Both films will comfortably cross Rs 100 crores in the first weekend. Both films have also registered the highest collection despite the mega clash. Singham Again is directed by Rohit Shetty and Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 is directed by Anees Bazmee.

Also read: Kartik Aaryan, Vidya Balan react to Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 vs Singham Again clash: ‘Agar hum teeno bahar khade ho toh…’

The DNA app is now available for download on the Google Play Store. Please download the app and share your feedback with us.

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 vs Singham Again box office clash: Ajay’s film earns Rs 43 crore against Kartik Aaryan’s Rs 35 crore

Diwali 2024 will set an example for Indian cinema by showing that two movies of different genres can coexist and break box office records. Kartik Aaryan in Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, Ajay Devgn in Singham AgainThis year’s Diwali has become an example in Bollywood. Two movies of different genres and highly-anticipated sequels clashed on the same day, but both took a monstrous start at the box office, making new and breaking old box office records. Kartik Aryan’s horror-comedy Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 and Ajay Devgn’s actioner Singham Again were released on November 1, and they both celebrated Diwali with a bang. 

Despite getting mixed reviews, both films, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 and Singham Again earned huge because of the audience support. Industry tracker portal Sacnilk shared the Day 1 box office collection of both films. And to much relief, BB3 and Singham 3 have brought Rs 79 crores collectively. Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 earned Rs 35.50 crores opening, despite getting fewer screens than Singham. On the other side, Ajay’s Singham led the Diwali race by earning Rs 10 crores more than Kartik’s film and earned Rs 43.50 crores. For the unversed, Singham Again’s advance booking opened a day later than BB3, yet the film performed exceedingly well thanks to positive word of mouth, Rohit Shetty and Ajay Devgn’s impressive track record, and the brand Singham. 

Kartik Aaryan and Vidya Balan discussing Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, Akshay Kumar in Bhool Bhulaiyaa 4, clash with Singham Again

[embedded content]

Records made by Singham Again and Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 has become the highest opener of Kartik Aaryan’s director, Anees Bazmee. BB3 also scored the third-biggest opening for Bollywood in 2024 after Stree 2 and Singham Again and the second-biggest opening for a horror-comedy after Stree 2. 

Singham Again has also made records of Ajay Devgn’s highest opening, Rohit Shetty’s highest opening, the highest opening in Rohit Shetty Cop Universe after Sooryavanshi, and the second biggest opening of 2024 after Stree 2. Both films will comfortably cross Rs 100 crores in the first weekend. Both films have also registered the highest collection despite the mega clash. Singham Again is directed by Rohit Shetty and Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 is directed by Anees Bazmee.

Also read: Kartik Aaryan, Vidya Balan react to Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 vs Singham Again clash: ‘Agar hum teeno bahar khade ho toh…’

The DNA app is now available for download on the Google Play Store. Please download the app and share your feedback with us.

UK to Introduce New ETA System for Tourists

The UK will gradually implement the new ETA system for those who want to travel to the country. Credit: A.P. / Colombia OneThe United Kingdom (UK) will change its border control system with the expansion of the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) scheme.
This new digital system will roll out in stages from late 2024 and it is an attempt on behalf of the British authorities to modernize the UK’s immigration process, whilst protecting the UK’s borders more effectively.
Starting November 27, 2024, eligible non-European travelers will be able to apply for an ETA, which will then become mandatory for entry into the UK from January 8, 2025.

European Union citizens that want to visit the UK will be able to begin their applications on March 5, 2025, with the requirement coming into effect in a mandatory way on April 2, 2025.
This new system will apply to all non-British and non-Irish citizens, including those who currently do not need a visa for short stays. Irish citizens are exempt because of the Common Travel Area (CTA) arrangement, which is a long-standing agreement between the UK, Ireland, and the Crown Dependencies (Isle of Man and Channel Islands).

This agreement allows the citizens of the UK and Ireland to travel freely between the two countries.
How much will it cost to travel to the UK under the ETA system?
The ETA will cost travelers £10 (approximately €12/$13) and will be electronically linked to the traveler’s passport.
Those who successfully issue the ETA, will be able to conduct multiple entries into the UK for stays up to six months over a two-year period or until their passport expires, whichever comes first.

This digital authorization system is an attempt to streamline the process and clarify issues that arose following the UK’s exit from the European Union and the end of the freedom of movement between the UK and the EU.
It has to be noted that the UK has already implemented eVisa systems for individuals who need permission to live, work, or study in the UK.
This digital proof of immigration status is gradually replacing physical documents such as biometric residence permits (BRPs) and visa stickers, which are largely not used anymore.
Most BRPs are set to expire by December 31, 2024, and holders are urged to create online accounts to access their eVisas before expiration. The same digital system has applied to EU nationals who live in the UK following Brexit, as their Settled Status is only proven in a digital form.
According to the UK government website, ”The government continues to work closely with global airline, maritime and rail carriers, who are crucial to ensuring smooth implementation of our digitisation programme.”

[embedded content]

‘Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3’ Movie Review: A Horror-Comedy With Social Messaging, But Does It Work?

“Ami Je Tomar…chin chin chin.” Any fan of Akshay Kumar’s 2007 film Bhool Bhulaiya would have a massive smile on their face when they hear those words, but is it a lost cause all these years later? I would be lying if I said I went into Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 with any expectations at all because I thought it would be worse than Part 2. So you can imagine my surprise when it turned out to be better than its predecessor and actually somewhat good? I don’t know if anyone goes into watching a Bollywood horror comedy hoping for a story, but if you did, then congratulations. On the surface, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 seems to be telling the same story yet again. There was a king who wrongfully had his daughter burned at the stake; we don’t know for what reason, of course, and so, many years later, she continues to haunt the kingdom in the hope for revenge. This is when an unknowing fraudulent “baba” arrives to save the day. I know it’s a tale as old as time, but underneath the facade of familiarity, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 actually has some newness to offer, and though it may not be perfect, it’s certainly worth applauding.

Before I jump into the film itself, I want to put aside the stuff that’s bothering you about the film before you actually watch it. Yes, the flashback scene, which is meant to evoke a feeling of wonder, only makes you wonder, “Why?!” I see many people making comparisons between the two actresses presented as rivals in the dance sequence that everyone is eager to watch because that is, of course, what happens when there’s two women in a picture; however, I think the comparison is completely illogical when it isn’t even the actresses themselves. Sure, we see what remains of Vidya Balan and Madhuri Dixit’s visages underneath all that airbrushing, but this isn’t them really dancing? The sequence completely erases Vidya Balan’s body to make it appear skinny because she’s meant to be “young.” An absolutely unforgivable act, if you ask me. However, I’m willing to ignore it because of the last act of the film. 

I don’t know what it is with directors pulling in a talented actress like Tripti Dimri and simply using her as eye candy. I mean, I know she’s absolutely stunning, but at least make her appearance worthwhile. I don’t know about you, but I feel like if she hadn’t been in this movie, it would’ve still worked just fine. In fact, it might’ve been better because at least we wouldn’t have had to sit through not 1, but 2 whole romantic songs and dances, or whatever movement you want to call it. The music really drags you out of the film, and the only song necessary was the banger that is “Ami Je Tomar,” and this might be a controversial opinion, but this new version is actually pretty decent and evokes a sense of dread, specifically in the first sequence of the film. I think the background score is pretty decent too and definitely hypes you up for what’s coming next. I think it’s perfect for a family viewing in the cinema. Okay, hold your horses. I know you’re going to ask me how I felt about Kartik Aaryan’s performance, and I’m going to disappoint you by saying he’s trying too hard to be Akshay Kumar, and it’s not working very well for him. Additionally, there is one particular dance sequence that feels completely butchered, especially with the way it is described in the film itself, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt for simply trying. Also, can Bollywood please, please, please get over these mediocre body-shaming jokes already? This second-hand embarrassment is unbearable. 

While the film itself is greatly flawed, I think it lives up to its name of “Bhool Bhulaiyaa,” i.e., a maze, because you never know who the “bad guy” is throughout the film. It’s a winding plot, and I think that works best enjoyed in the cinema because I think no matter how much you concentrate, you might not know what’s coming to hit you. The pacing of the film, while decent, is messed up with the song sequences, especially in the first half, because it drags on way too long. If you’re looking for scares specifically, there are actually some jump scares in here that might get you, but the first film completely annihilates this one in comparison. It is a feeling that is missing in these films thanks to “advanced technology” that allows you to erase expression off of an actor’s face. I think Vidya Balan and Madhuri Dixit bring incredible dignified flair to the screen in this movie and personally had no idea that the latter could be so good in a horror role. The trio, that is, the three pandits, have a much better role to play this time around than the last time, and some of their jokes actually land. The one with Netflix really got me, though I’m embarrassed to say it. 

So while I set out on a rant of why this movie is actually mediocre, I can’t help myself but recommend it still, because underneath the garb of a horror-comedy lies a simple social message that actually hit me in the chest. Additionally, coming from such a massive franchise and with big actors in Bollywood, I can’t help but imagine it was a bold step, and I would hope it pays off and paves the way for more and better. Also, despite the run-of-the-mill dialogue and Kartik Aaryan’s nonexistent comic timing, the film still manages to be entertaining, especially in the second half (barring that one song, which I didn’t even bother watching). I suppose I might be one of the few people on the internet giving this film a positive review, but I think if you’re looking for Bollywood masala this weekend, it might not be a bad choice. So, despite my myriad disclaimers, I’m going to have to urge you to watch this movie and give it 3 stars out of 5, specifically for the actresses and the final act of the film, which (I hate to admit it) actually got me a bit emotional (no tears were shed).

Related

‘Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3’ Movie Review: A Horror-Comedy With Social Messaging, But Does It Work?

“Ami Je Tomar…chin chin chin.” Any fan of Akshay Kumar’s 2007 film Bhool Bhulaiya would have a massive smile on their face when they hear those words, but is it a lost cause all these years later? I would be lying if I said I went into Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 with any expectations at all because I thought it would be worse than Part 2. So you can imagine my surprise when it turned out to be better than its predecessor and actually somewhat good? I don’t know if anyone goes into watching a Bollywood horror comedy hoping for a story, but if you did, then congratulations. On the surface, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 seems to be telling the same story yet again. There was a king who wrongfully had his daughter burned at the stake; we don’t know for what reason, of course, and so, many years later, she continues to haunt the kingdom in the hope for revenge. This is when an unknowing fraudulent “baba” arrives to save the day. I know it’s a tale as old as time, but underneath the facade of familiarity, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 actually has some newness to offer, and though it may not be perfect, it’s certainly worth applauding.

Before I jump into the film itself, I want to put aside the stuff that’s bothering you about the film before you actually watch it. Yes, the flashback scene, which is meant to evoke a feeling of wonder, only makes you wonder, “Why?!” I see many people making comparisons between the two actresses presented as rivals in the dance sequence that everyone is eager to watch because that is, of course, what happens when there’s two women in a picture; however, I think the comparison is completely illogical when it isn’t even the actresses themselves. Sure, we see what remains of Vidya Balan and Madhuri Dixit’s visages underneath all that airbrushing, but this isn’t them really dancing? The sequence completely erases Vidya Balan’s body to make it appear skinny because she’s meant to be “young.” An absolutely unforgivable act, if you ask me. However, I’m willing to ignore it because of the last act of the film. 

I don’t know what it is with directors pulling in a talented actress like Tripti Dimri and simply using her as eye candy. I mean, I know she’s absolutely stunning, but at least make her appearance worthwhile. I don’t know about you, but I feel like if she hadn’t been in this movie, it would’ve still worked just fine. In fact, it might’ve been better because at least we wouldn’t have had to sit through not 1, but 2 whole romantic songs and dances, or whatever movement you want to call it. The music really drags you out of the film, and the only song necessary was the banger that is “Ami Je Tomar,” and this might be a controversial opinion, but this new version is actually pretty decent and evokes a sense of dread, specifically in the first sequence of the film. I think the background score is pretty decent too and definitely hypes you up for what’s coming next. I think it’s perfect for a family viewing in the cinema. Okay, hold your horses. I know you’re going to ask me how I felt about Kartik Aaryan’s performance, and I’m going to disappoint you by saying he’s trying too hard to be Akshay Kumar, and it’s not working very well for him. Additionally, there is one particular dance sequence that feels completely butchered, especially with the way it is described in the film itself, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt for simply trying. Also, can Bollywood please, please, please get over these mediocre body-shaming jokes already? This second-hand embarrassment is unbearable. 

While the film itself is greatly flawed, I think it lives up to its name of “Bhool Bhulaiyaa,” i.e., a maze, because you never know who the “bad guy” is throughout the film. It’s a winding plot, and I think that works best enjoyed in the cinema because I think no matter how much you concentrate, you might not know what’s coming to hit you. The pacing of the film, while decent, is messed up with the song sequences, especially in the first half, because it drags on way too long. If you’re looking for scares specifically, there are actually some jump scares in here that might get you, but the first film completely annihilates this one in comparison. It is a feeling that is missing in these films thanks to “advanced technology” that allows you to erase expression off of an actor’s face. I think Vidya Balan and Madhuri Dixit bring incredible dignified flair to the screen in this movie and personally had no idea that the latter could be so good in a horror role. The trio, that is, the three pandits, have a much better role to play this time around than the last time, and some of their jokes actually land. The one with Netflix really got me, though I’m embarrassed to say it. 

So while I set out on a rant of why this movie is actually mediocre, I can’t help myself but recommend it still, because underneath the garb of a horror-comedy lies a simple social message that actually hit me in the chest. Additionally, coming from such a massive franchise and with big actors in Bollywood, I can’t help but imagine it was a bold step, and I would hope it pays off and paves the way for more and better. Also, despite the run-of-the-mill dialogue and Kartik Aaryan’s nonexistent comic timing, the film still manages to be entertaining, especially in the second half (barring that one song, which I didn’t even bother watching). I suppose I might be one of the few people on the internet giving this film a positive review, but I think if you’re looking for Bollywood masala this weekend, it might not be a bad choice. So, despite my myriad disclaimers, I’m going to have to urge you to watch this movie and give it 3 stars out of 5, specifically for the actresses and the final act of the film, which (I hate to admit it) actually got me a bit emotional (no tears were shed).

Related

‘Don’t Come Home’ Time Travel & Ending Questions Answered: Did Varee Give Birth To Min?

If you ignore all the time-travel plot holes in Don’t Come Home, then at the end of the day, it is a pretty simple and straightforward series. But I guess a lot of confusion arises in the viewer’s mind, simply because the writers didn’t bother to explain the gaps in the story, especially the matter of how Min came into existence. I was kind of shocked to see so many people still confused about the “time travel” aspect of it even after reading our ending explained article, and since the replies aren’t the best place to discuss things in detail, I decided to lay it all out in layman’s terms. Hope this one helps.

Spoiler Alert

Panida Didn’t Create A Time Machine

So, first things first, Panida Jarukanant, Varee’s real mother, didn’t create a time machine. It would be blasphemous to call that glass chamber a time machine. In any science fiction film or series that you’ll come across, a time machine is basically a device where you can set a particular time or date so it can take you to your intended destination. The lake in the recently released film Caddo Lake was not a time machine. It was a portal. And because these things don’t have any set coordinates, the screenwriters often take advantage of such a flaw to make the audience believe that these time portals have a mind of their own. So, what did Panida actually create?

I really don’t want to get into the complexities of branching universes, so I will keep it as simple as I can for the sake of my own sanity and yours. Thanks to Avengers: Endgame, we all know a little about different timelines running parallel to the original timeline, right? Taking that into consideration, Panida’s faulty generator created a portal between two timelines, and because of that, people or objects from one timeline ended up in another timeline due to this mischievous portal. Again, you might wonder how Varee (or adult Min) from 2024 (I suppose) ended up in 1992 if the timelines run parallel to each other. The hole created by the generator should be in a straight line, right? The thing is, there isn’t any defined law. We are just assuming that timelines run parallel to each other, which doesn’t mean that the time periods would match up as well. I know this is one of the biggest time travel flaws in Don’t Come Home, but Apple TV’s Dark Matter handled this concept quite well. In that show, despite traveling across different timelines, the traveler landed in the same time period as the one they had originated from. Meanwhile, HBO’s Caddo Lake didn’t bother to explain how the time travel portal really worked. People entered the liminal space in one time period and ended up in a different time period altogether, thereby creating all kinds of paradoxes and complications. So, you have just to accept that that’s how things are in Don’t Come Home. 

Additionally, the electrical vibrations from the generator not only created a portal but “slightly shifted” it, because of which the two timelines converged into each other, which is the only reason why young Min and Varee (adult Min) were seeing ghosts in the house in the present time (2024). But that’s only one out of the many theories that we can come up with to talk about the time travel shenanigans.

Don’t Come Home doesn’t really address the time paradox, but we have often seen in popular time travel narratives that if two versions of the same person exist in the same timeline, then things get pretty weird, and so these terrifying visions or hallucinations could be a result of that. The third possibility is that both Mins (adult and young) had lived pretty traumatized lives, and their trauma might have had a crucial role to play in their hallucinations. Funny thing is, a plethora of policemen, househelp workers, Fah, and many other people visited the house, but the time traveling portal didn’t affect anyone except for the Jarukanant family. Well, there isn’t any logical reason for it, but the creators didn’t want more work on their hands by getting other characters’ lives affected by the time-traveling portal. 

Yes, Min Gave Birth To Herself

I won’t be referring to adult Min as Varee because the original Varee already died with her father in a car accident that took place in 1991. Many of us are only confused with the names because Varee’s mother, who blamed herself for her daughter and husband’s deaths, started calling young Min Varee. 

Moving forward, I really want to let you know that Min doesn’t exist in the original timeline. There is no way she could, and she came into existence only because Panida decided to fiddle with the timeline. But I know a question comes to your mind: How could Min exist in other timelines? There has to be a starting point, right? Well, there isn’t. This is one of the biggest paradoxes in the series, which is why Min’s existence cannot be explained. We can bang our heads on the table but still won’t be able to answer the question of which came first: the chicken or the egg.

In Caddo Lake, the character of Anna Bennett, who went into the past and created a branched timeline, was an adopted child, which would have made a bit of sense in Don’t Come Home if we consider the possibility that Min didn’t give birth to herself and young Min was an adopted child. Even adult Min’s husband, Yutthachai, had told Inspector Fah that young Min wasn’t his child. But even after moving in circles, the question remains the same: if in the original timeline, adult Min doesn’t exist, then how did young Min, whom we are considering not to be Yutthachai’s biological child, end up at the Jarukanant house to start the infinite loop? There has to be a person to bring her to that house so she can hide in the wardrobe and fall into the madness of the multiverse. I know you all eagerly want to ask who came first, adult Min or young Min, but there isn’t any logical answer to that question, and it’s a paradox that could never be explained.

But if you are not going into that complex zone and just want to ask how someone could give birth to themselves; then it is a case of simple human biology. To “create” a human, we just need X and Y chromosomes (I am sure I am going to upset a lot of religious fanatics and medical experts, but pardon my science). Even though it sounds like an incestuous relationship, Min did give birth to her own daughter, and her own father was the father of her new child, also named Min. It does sound creepy, but it’s not impossible.  

Min Is Stuck In A Time Loop

Time is a flat circle, and just like any geometrical circle, there isn’t any beginning or end. The lore of Don’t Come Home says that an adult Min fell in love with Colonel Yutthachai while working as a reporter and married him, only to find out in the end that he was a toxic “alpha male” who accused adult Min of cheating on him and started to physically and sexually abuse her. As per the final montage of the series, Yutthachai started raising his hand against his wife only after she got pregnant, and it surely had something to do with Min’s pregnancy. Maybe he believed that adult Min was carrying someone else’s child, and that was the reason he told Fah that the child wasn’t his.

Min was stuck in an abusive marriage, and the day she decided to break the chain, she ended up in another loop. Adult Min, with her daughter, also Min, arrived at the Jarukanant house, and after spending a day or two in the house, she switched on the generator that opened the time-travel portal in the house. Both mother and daughter started to experience supernatural events around them, which were nothing but events of the past occurring in front of their eyes due to the faulty generator. On one stormy night, a frightened young Min hid in the closet, only to fall into another timeline where she met her grandmother, Panida, who had recently lost her entire family. Panida decided to keep Min and raise her as her own, but soon she reactivated the generator, and an adult Min arrived in 1992, looking for her lost daughter. Panida, possessed by demons of her own, refused to give young Min to adult Min and finally killed an adult Min in the end. Both Panida and young Min left the house after such a tragic turn of events, and as Min grew up, she made the same mistakes as her former self, or her mother, whatever you want to call her. Maybe, it is an example of how history repeats itself and we are destined to repeat our parents’ mistakes. 

I guess, at this point, it would be safe to assume that Min would never be able to break out of the time loop because she never really finds out that she was stuck in one. We, as normal human beings, are imprisoned in the cage of our own thoughts and upbringing, and only in retrospect are we able to see the mistakes we have committed. Adult Min found out that she was stuck in the past only a day before her death, and she couldn’t have done much to escape it. Panida had imprisoned herself in her own grief, and while trying to overcome her own trauma, she was ready to steal a mother’s child and kill the mother to protect her vested interest. Last but not least, men like Yutthachai are prisoners of their own pride, and I will leave it at that.

I believe, in the end, it was only Fah who was able to break “her” loop. She made peace with the fact that she would never be able to bring back adult Min, as she’d already died in 1992, and Fah didn’t have the means to travel to the past. She knew that she couldn’t save a young Min either because the young girl was already lost in time. So, looking ahead, Fah decided to change what she could. She broke off her secret affair with Superintendent Danai, the man who had gotten her pregnant but refused to acknowledge the relationship they had. Fah decided to raise her child without a father and even asked the nurse not to mention the child’s father’s name on the birth certificate because Danai didn’t deserve it. And I am sure Fah is the only person who comes out transformed in the end. As far as Min is concerned, it’s a tragedy that no one can really resolve, and one can only learn from her story. Before wrapping up, I think I answered pretty much all the things that have been bugging you after finishing the series, but apologies if I missed anything. Feel free to drop your queries in the comment box below, and I would be happy to discuss further.

Related

Rwanda’s global appeal draws tourists and investors alike, spurring growth 

 It is easy to fall in love with Rwanda–the world renowned land of 1000 hills.
From the gorilla trekking that attracts thousands of tourists annually, to expanding infrastructure, preserving its past that tells the story of how far it has come in recent years, and the peaceful transition with ample security and harmony among its population, Rwanda has won global acclaim.To boot, it now ranks as one of the best countries in the central African region whose ease of doing business is attracting foreign investment, helping embrace a new narrative and ambition, moving away from an old era of genocide that saw thousands of its population perish three decades ago.
“I came as a tourist and decided to stay permanently after I saw ample opportunities for business and in Rwanda, there is no corruption and you feel there is a functioning public service and system that benefits everyday people and is what is attracting people from other nations,” FasilTilahun,an Ethiopian entrepreneur, said as he contemplates a future in Rwanda.
He is not alone.- Advertisement –

Mucking With Movies: ‘Saturday Night’

Jack Simon is a mogul coach and writer/director who enjoys eating food he can’t afford, traveling to places out of his budget, and creating art about skiing, eating, and traveling while broke. Check out his website jacksimonmakes.com to see his Jack’s Jitney travelogue series. You can email him at [email protected] for inquiries of any type.Jack Simon/Courtesy photo

I am not as much a fan of the show “Saturday Night Live” as I am of fan of the lore surrounding it: the miscreants, the after-parties, the short-term members who departed for reasons ranging from highly-publicized failures to unfortunate passings. So, what was most important to me in “Saturday Night” was an accurate depiction of exactly how much cocaine was backstage. And kudos to them!

For the most part, they never shied away from the debauchery that made the backstage so famous. You had Lorne Michaels (Gabriel LaBelle) offering George Carlin more coke with Dan Akroyd (Dylan O’Brien) massaging Carlin’s neck after realizing that Carlin has already done too much coke and can’t get onstage; Chevy Chase (Cory Michael Smith) jousting with “Mr. Television” Milton Berle in a neat moment that displays how monsters are made in Hollywood; and John Belushi’s (Matt Wood) mercurial behavior, which constantly threatened his career and the show’s success.

If that sounds like I crammed a lot of famous names into one sentence, that’s because I had to — “Saturday Night” has to. It’s unavoidable. Almost every name in that famous first episode became a superstar. But, director Jason Reitman could have handled it with a little more tack. It almost becomes a parody version of itself at times, a la “Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story,” as one actor after another is forced by the script to say their full name into the camera.

The bloat doesn’t end with the name-dropping either, as the edit doesn’t know what to do with its wide range of character arcs. With so much going on and with the movie portraying the “real-time” 90 minutes before the first episode went on air, you would think they would elect to cut the story as straightforward as possible.

Instead, Reitman and his team decided to edit in flashbacks during crucial moments like Lorne lying to NBC Head of Talent David Tebet (William Dafoe) about how well the show is coming together. The flashbacks depict all the times that the show has, in fact, not been coming together well. It’s not only a joke that falls flat, but it also throws out the film’s own rubric. If you are using real-time, you need to stay with the characters every moment. Otherwise, the assumption is that Lorne was staring at Tebet for 30 seconds, not speaking and unblinking, as all the memories came flooding back to him.

The biggest thing the film has going for it are the performances, which, across the board, are phenomenal. Most notable is newcomer O’Brien’s turn as Belushi. My dad raised me on Belushi sketches and performances, showing me “Animal House” when I was still young enough that my mom nearly filed for divorce after she caught me rewatching it, and I told her that Dad said it was OK. Nobody needed fewer words to be hysterical than Belushi, and that ability is perfectly portrayed by O’Brien. In the film, Lorne’s then-wife Rose Shuster (Rachel Sennot) compares his ability to project through tiny tics in his facial expressions to Marlin Brando as a way to butter him up, but in reality, I don’t think she’s far off. In a better world, where Belushi survived his self-destructive habits, I believe he would have gone on to a tremendous second act of his career as a dramatic actor. O’Brien is somehow able to capture that brilliance in a real-life portrayal.

It is this realistic portrayal that leads us into the third act, which saves the film from all its sins. After Belushi is found at the 30 Rockafeller ice skating rink, Lorne tries to lure him back inside. Instead, he insists, “I want to try a triple axle.” She asks, “How about a single?” and he finishes it by saying, “I’ll either do a triple or die trying.” So, perfectly summing up the film’s thesis, the impossibility of managing inflated egos with cursed existences is a thankless gig that has nonetheless been a crucial expense in the making of art since its inception. It is the catalyst for the conquering ending that ensues. Everything and everybody is tied up neatly, and you’re cheering for this plucky little underdog show that will go on to become the most successful in the history of television.

It’s not until this ending that the film reveals its whole hand, and you realize it’s won. It fooled you into believing it was shallow, when the deep end was just a few steps away.

Critic Score: 7.2.

Jack Simon is a mogul coach and writer/director who enjoys eating food he can’t afford, traveling to places out of his budget, and creating art about skiing, eating, and traveling while broke. Check out his website jacksimonmakes.com to see his Jack’s Jitney travelogue series. You can email him at [email protected] for inquiries of any type.
Jack Simon is a mogul coach and writer/director who enjoys eating food he can’t afford, traveling to places out of his budget, and creating art about skiing, eating, and traveling while broke. Check out his website jacksimonmakes.com to see his Jack’s Jitney travelogue series. You can email him at [email protected] for inquiries of any type.

Business Beat: Work proceeds on Longview wine storage, social club

A March opening is expected for a new wine social club and climate-controlled wine storage facility on Judson Road in Longview.Noah and Mary Yoder are renovating a former house as the home of Flatt 55, which will be the first wine storage facility in Longview.The house at 1900 Judson Road was built in the late 1940s by the Johnston family, according to Noah Yoder and online appraisal district records. It’s tucked away from the road on about 3 acres of land with ducks from a nearby pond roaming around on the rear of the property. Noah Yoder said the house still features the hand-hewn timbers it was constructed with from North or South Carolina. He also said it was built with Clinker bricks that have black marks on them because they were burned in the San Francisco fire in 1906. #placement_588479_0_i{width:100%;margin:0 auto;}

Judson Rd. location of Flatt, Longview’s first wine storage business/social club, with a kitchen for events. (Les Hassell/Longview News-Journal Photo)

“It’s a wine social club,” Noah Yoder said. “You have to buy a membership to use the facility.”He has not yet determined how many memberships will be available. A chef’s kitchen is being added on one side of the house that will have seating for 25 people. Members may rent the room, bring their own chef and host parties and other events there. Mary Yoder, a registered nurse, said the entrance to the social club will feature a lobby where members can meet with clients or sit and work.”It’s pretty much like a fancy hotel lobby,” she said. The business also will sell boutique wines from wineries that are too small to have their own distribution systems. That means they are limited supply wines. “When we sell out of one, we’ll go to another,” Noah Yoder said. “It’s kind of unique in that sense.”When renovations are complete, the business will include a 2,000-square-foot climate-controlled wine cooler that will hold 50,000-60,000 bottles of wine. It will feature about 250 wine lockers of various sizes, with the largest walk-in locker measuring 40 square feet. The business also will accept shipments of wine for customers, Noah Yoder said, explaining that people join wine clubs and then get automatic shipments. They might have wine cellars in their homes but run out of room, or they just have some they want to keep for years. Noah Yoder is retired but previously owned Yoder Construction in Longview for 35 years. He also owns climate-controlled storage facilities, which is how he became aware of the wine storage industry.He and Mary said they’ve visited other wine storage businesses in Tyler, Shreveport and Dallas, for instance, but theirs is the first in Longview.”They only do storage,” Mary Yoder said and don’t have a lounge or kitchen.The Yoders have hired Julie Ober as membership director. She previously was a manager at Harley’s and then worked for 10 years in wine sales with Republic National Distributing Co. “She brings a lot to the table,” Mary Yoder said.Wine tastings and education opportunities will be offered at Flatt 55, which also will feature an outdoor patio area.@import url(https://fonts.bunny.net/css?family=ibm-plex-sans:400,600);

#_form_11_ { font-size:14px; line-height:1.6; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif; margin:0; }
#_form_11_ * { outline:0; }
._form_hide { display:none; visibility:hidden; }
._form_show { display:block; visibility:visible; }
#_form_11_._form-top { top:0; }
#_form_11_._form-bottom { bottom:0; }
#_form_11_._form-left { left:0; }
#_form_11_._form-right { right:0; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”text”],#_form_11_ input[type=”tel”],#_form_11_ input[type=”date”],#_form_11_ textarea { padding:6px; height:auto; border:#979797 1px solid; border-radius:4px; color:#000 !important; font-size:14px; -webkit-box-sizing:border-box; -moz-box-sizing:border-box; box-sizing:border-box; }
#_form_11_ textarea { resize:none; }
#_form_11_ ._submit { -webkit-appearance:none; cursor:pointer; font-family:arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; text-align:center; background:#004cff !important; border:0 !important; -moz-border-radius:4px !important; -webkit-border-radius:4px !important; border-radius:4px !important; color:#fff !important; padding:10px !important; }
#_form_11_ ._submit:disabled { cursor:not-allowed; opacity:0.4; }
#_form_11_ ._submit.processing { position:relative; }
#_form_11_ ._submit.processing::before { content:”; width:1em; height:1em; position:absolute; z-index:1; top:50%; left:50%; border:double 3px transparent; border-radius:50%; background-image:linear-gradient(#004cff, #004cff), conic-gradient(#004cff, #fff); background-origin:border-box; background-clip:content-box, border-box; animation:1200ms ease 0s infinite normal none running _spin; }
#_form_11_ ._submit.processing::after { content:”; position:absolute; top:0; bottom:0; left:0; right:0; background:#004cff !important; border:0 !important; -moz-border-radius:4px !important; -webkit-border-radius:4px !important; border-radius:4px !important; color:#fff !important; padding:10px !important; }
@keyframes _spin { 0% { transform:translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(90deg); }
100% { transform:translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(450deg); }
}
#_form_11_ ._close-icon { cursor:pointer; background-image:url(‘https://d226aj4ao1t61q.cloudfront.net/esfkyjh1u_forms-close-dark.png’); background-repeat:no-repeat; background-size:14.2px 14.2px; position:absolute; display:block; top:11px; right:9px; overflow:hidden; width:16.2px; height:16.2px; }
#_form_11_ ._close-icon:before { position:relative; }
#_form_11_ ._form-body { margin-bottom:30px; }
#_form_11_ ._form-image-left { width:150px; float:left; }
#_form_11_ ._form-content-right { margin-left:164px; }
#_form_11_ ._form-branding { color:#fff; font-size:10px; clear:both; text-align:left; margin-top:30px; font-weight:100; }
#_form_11_ ._form-branding ._logo { display:block; width:130px; height:14px; margin-top:6px; background-image:url(‘https://d226aj4ao1t61q.cloudfront.net/hh9ujqgv5_aclogo_li.png’); background-size:130px auto; background-repeat:no-repeat; }
#_form_11_ .form-sr-only { position:absolute; width:1px; height:1px; padding:0; margin:-1px; overflow:hidden; clip:rect(0, 0, 0, 0); border:0; }
#_form_11_ ._form-label,#_form_11_ ._form_element ._form-label { font-weight:bold; margin-bottom:5px; display:block; }
#_form_11_._dark ._form-branding { color:#333; }
#_form_11_._dark ._form-branding ._logo { background-image:url(‘https://d226aj4ao1t61q.cloudfront.net/jftq2c8s_aclogo_dk.png’); }
#_form_11_ ._form_element { position:relative; margin-bottom:10px; font-size:0; max-width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element * { font-size:14px; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element._clear { clear:both; width:100%; float:none; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element._clear:after { clear:left; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element input[type=”text”],#_form_11_ ._form_element input[type=”date”],#_form_11_ ._form_element select,#_form_11_ ._form_element textarea:not(.g-recaptcha-response) { display:block; width:100%; -webkit-box-sizing:border-box; -moz-box-sizing:border-box; box-sizing:border-box; font-family:inherit; }
#_form_11_ ._field-wrapper { position:relative; }
#_form_11_ ._inline-style { float:left; }
#_form_11_ ._inline-style input[type=”text”] { width:150px; }
#_form_11_ ._inline-style:not(._clear) + ._inline-style:not(._clear) { margin-left:20px; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element img._form-image { max-width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element ._form-fieldset { border:0; padding:0.01em 0 0 0; margin:0; min-width:0; }
#_form_11_ ._clear-element { clear:left; }
#_form_11_ ._full_width { width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._form_full_field { display:block; width:100%; margin-bottom:10px; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”text”]._has_error,#_form_11_ textarea._has_error { border:#f37c7b 1px solid; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”checkbox”]._has_error { outline:#f37c7b 1px solid; }
#_form_11_ ._error { display:block; position:absolute; font-size:14px; z-index:10000001; }
#_form_11_ ._error._above { padding-bottom:4px; bottom:39px; right:0; }
#_form_11_ ._error._below { padding-top:8px; top:100%; right:0; }
#_form_11_ ._error._above ._error-arrow { bottom:-4px; right:15px; border-left:8px solid transparent; border-right:8px solid transparent; border-top:8px solid #fdd; }
#_form_11_ ._error._below ._error-arrow { top:0; right:15px; border-left:8px solid transparent; border-right:8px solid transparent; border-bottom:8px solid #fdd; }
#_form_11_ ._error-inner { padding:12px 12px 12px 36px; background-color:#fdd; background-image:url(“data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg width=’16’ height=’16’ viewBox=’0 0 16 16′ fill=’none’ xmlns=’http://www.w3.org/2000/svg’%3E%3Cpath fill-rule=’evenodd’ clip-rule=’evenodd’ d=’M16 8C16 12.4183 12.4183 16 8 16C3.58172 16 0 12.4183 0 8C0 3.58172 3.58172 0 8 0C12.4183 0 16 3.58172 16 8ZM9 3V9H7V3H9ZM9 13V11H7V13H9Z’ fill=’%23CA0000’/%3E%3C/svg%3E”); background-repeat:no-repeat; background-position:12px center; font-size:14px; font-family:arial, sans-serif; font-weight:600; line-height:16px; color:#000; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; -webkit-border-radius:4px; -moz-border-radius:4px; border-radius:4px; box-shadow:0px 1px 4px rgba(31, 33, 41, 0.298295); }
#_form_11_ ._error-inner._form_error { margin-bottom:5px; text-align:left; }
#_form_11_ ._button-wrapper ._error-inner._form_error { position:static; }
#_form_11_ ._error-inner._no_arrow { margin-bottom:10px; }
#_form_11_ ._error-arrow { position:absolute; width:0; height:0; }
#_form_11_ ._error-html { margin-bottom:10px; }
.pika-single { z-index:10000001 !important; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”text”].datetime_date { width:69%; display:inline; }
#_form_11_ select.datetime_time { width:29%; display:inline; height:32px; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”date”].datetime_date { width:69%; display:inline-flex; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”time”].datetime_time { width:29%; display:inline-flex; }
@media all and (min-width:320px) and (max-width:667px) { ::-webkit-scrollbar { display:none; }
#_form_11_ { margin:0; width:100%; min-width:100%; max-width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; }
#_form_11_ * { -webkit-box-sizing:border-box; -moz-box-sizing:border-box; box-sizing:border-box; font-size:1em; }
#_form_11_ ._form-content { margin:0; width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._form-inner { display:block; min-width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._form-title,#_form_11_ ._inline-style { margin-top:0; margin-right:0; margin-left:0; }
#_form_11_ ._form-title { font-size:1.2em; }
#_form_11_ ._form_element { margin:0 0 20px; padding:0; width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._form-element,#_form_11_ ._inline-style,#_form_11_ input[type=”text”],#_form_11_ label,#_form_11_ p,#_form_11_ textarea:not(.g-recaptcha-response) { float:none; display:block; width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._row._checkbox-radio label { display:inline; }
#_form_11_ ._row,#_form_11_ p,#_form_11_ label { margin-bottom:0.7em; width:100%; }
#_form_11_ ._row input[type=”checkbox”],#_form_11_ ._row input[type=”radio”] { margin:0 !important; vertical-align:middle !important; }
#_form_11_ ._row input[type=”checkbox”] + span label { display:inline; }
#_form_11_ ._row span label { margin:0 !important; width:initial !important; vertical-align:middle !important; }
#_form_11_ ._form-image { max-width:100%; height:auto !important; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”text”] { padding-left:10px; padding-right:10px; font-size:16px; line-height:1.3em; -webkit-appearance:none; }
#_form_11_ input[type=”radio”],#_form_11_ input[type=”checkbox”] { display:inline-block; width:1.3em; height:1.3em; font-size:1em; margin:0 0.3em 0 0; vertical-align:baseline; }
#_form_11_ button[type=”submit”] { padding:20px; font-size:1.5em; }
#_form_11_ ._inline-style { margin:20px 0 0 !important; }
}
#_form_11_ { position:relative; text-align:left; margin:25px auto 0; padding:20px; -webkit-box-sizing:border-box; -moz-box-sizing:border-box; box-sizing:border-box; *zoom:1; background:#fff !important; border:0px solid #b0b0b0 !important; max-width:500px; -moz-border-radius:0px !important; -webkit-border-radius:0px !important; border-radius:0px !important; color:#000 !important; }
#_form_11_ ._form-title { font-size:22px; line-height:22px; font-weight:600; margin-bottom:0; }
#_form_11_:before,#_form_11_:after { content:” “; display:table; }
#_form_11_:after { clear:both; }
#_form_11_._inline-style { width:auto; display:inline-block; }
#_form_11_._inline-style input[type=”text”],#_form_11_._inline-style input[type=”date”] { padding:10px 12px; }
#_form_11_._inline-style button._inline-style { position:relative; top:27px; }
#_form_11_._inline-style p { margin:0; }
#_form_11_._inline-style ._button-wrapper { position:relative; margin:27px 12.5px 0 20px; }
#_form_11_ ._form-thank-you { position:relative; left:0; right:0; text-align:center; font-size:18px; }
@media all and (min-width:320px) and (max-width:667px) { #_form_11_._inline-form._inline-style ._inline-style._button-wrapper { margin-top:20px !important; margin-left:0 !important; }
}
#_form_11_ .iti.iti–allow-dropdown.iti–separate-dial-code { width:100%; }
#_form_11_ .iti input { width:100%; height:32px; border:#979797 1px solid; border-radius:4px; }
#_form_11_ .iti–separate-dial-code .iti__selected-flag { background-color:#fff; border-radius:4px; }
#_form_11_ .iti–separate-dial-code .iti__selected-flag:hover { background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); }
#_form_11_ .iti__country-list { border-radius:4px; margin-top:4px; min-width:460px; }
#_form_11_ .iti__country-list–dropup { margin-bottom:4px; }
#_form_11_ .phone-error-hidden { display:none; }
#_form_11_ .phone-error { color:#e40e49; }
#_form_11_ .phone-input-error { border:1px solid #e40e49 !important; }

New Etsy-style marketAnnie Edwards has introduced a new shopping event to East Texas with a market dedicated to people’s homemade products.The first East Texas Etsy Market was held during the Longview Mall’s recent Boo and Brew.

Annie Edwards

The next East Texas Etsy Market will be staged 10 a.m.-8 p.m. Nov 30 at Longview Mall. That’s the same day the mall will celebrate its annual Christmas Tree lighting, from 5:30-8 p.m.The East Texas Etsy Market — named for the popular website where people sell their homemade items — will be held the first weekend of the month on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, starting in DecemberEdwards and her husband, Devin, recently moved to the Longview area. He was born and raised here, and they met in San Diego when he was in the Navy.She said there was always a “crazy” demand for homemade items in San Diego. That city had a similar monthly market as the events she is organizing,In San Diego, she made and sold candles. Her candle business is on hold for now until the couple get settled in from their move.When she moved here, Edwards realized there were a lot of women who don’t work outside the home but have home-based businesses, she said. The market will help those women make some sort of income, Edwards said.”We want to bring that here because not only is it something that’s very popular around here, it helps people have some sort of income,” she said. Deadline for registration for each market is the Monday before the event. Vendor fee is $75. For information, email Edwards at [email protected] or visit East Texas Etsy Market on Facebook at tinyurl.com/4xzyban6 .Jewelry storeValliani Jewelers is expected to open in Longview Mall in the coming weeks.The company is remodeling the space previously occupied by Gordon Jewelers.Valliani Jewelry started in 1999 in California.

Ocean full of alien life could be hiding on nearby icy moon system, say scientists in ‘incredibly surprising’ discovery

AN ocean full of alien life could be hiding on an icy moon system not far from earth, in what scientists have called an “incredibly surprising” discovery.The moon, named Miranda, orbits the planet Uranus – just 1.7 billion miles away in our very own solar system.2Scientists have discovered that Miranda, a moon orbiting Uranus, may have a hidden ocean full of alien lifeCredit: NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory-Caltech2Uranus has 13 known rings and around 27 moonsCredit: YouTube/Olhar DigitalIt is now believed to have a hidden ocean, trapped under a layer of ice, according to a recent study.The presence of water on the moon means it could harbour alien life.No extra-terrestrial life has ever been discovered by scientists, but it could include intelligent, non-human beings.The ocean could be as large as 62 miles deep, underneath an icy crust that’s 19 miles thick.Read more Tech News Planetary scientist Tom Nordheim, who did the study along with fellow scientists Caleb Strom and Alex Patthoff, expressed his astonishment at the findings.He said: “To find evidence of an ocean inside a small object like Miranda is incredibly surprising.”It helps build on the story that some of these moons at Uranus may be really interesting – that there may be several ocean worlds around one of the most distant planets in our solar system, which is both exciting and bizarre.”Mr Strom echoed: “The suggestion of an ocean inside one of the most distant moons in the solar system is remarkable.”The trio used images captured by a Voyager 2 spacecraft in 1986 to technologically map out Miranda’s geological past.As they modelled the moon’s contours, they saw shapes on the its surface similar to a patchwork. Mystery of ‘alien song’ in deepest point on Earth SOLVED after eerie audioThey believe this could signal that a subsurface ocean may have been formed between 100 and 500 million years ago.Equally remarkable was the discovery that this ocean might have stayed warm enough to remain liquid, despite the moon being a significant distance from the Sun.This is due to a friction build-up between Miranda and about 27 neighbouring moons also orbiting Uranus – generating heat.Mr Nordheim urged for further research in this area, adding that he and his colleagues were “squeezing the last bit of science we can from Voyager 2’s images”.It comes as Nasa discovered mysterious green dots on Mars, which could also point to the presence of alien life.Meanwhile, the space agency also described the planet Kepler-70b, which is also believed to possibly have alien life, as “another circle of hell” – with temperatures “hotter than the Sun”.