Can Fear Make You a Better Fighter? Here’s What Science Says About Combat Sports

Behind the physical prowess of fighters, there’s a mental game going on in the background. A major component of that game is fear. One can imagine stepping into a ring in front of thousands in the crowd millions behind the screen. The world is watching. The screams and shouts fill the atmosphere, and the noise deafens. Lights illuminate the ring. The person on the other side is ready to kill if needed. Fear is bound to creep in here. It’s imminent. The battle started long before the bell rang. The build-up, the weigh-ins, media, fans so many other things have been eating away at the psyche. The Science of FearThe body activates the sympathetic nervous system in the face of danger. It gives us two options: fight or flight. We can either face the danger or run away from it. In a ring, flight is never an option. One can only pick the other one. As a result, the heart rate shoots up, the skin starts to sweat profusely and blood rushes into the veins. Fear and anxiety are part and parcel of this process. In combat sports, fighters often describe time as slowing down and feeling hyperaware of their surroundings. Yet, fear also tends to distort perception, making them hesitate or second-guess their decisions—potentially fatal errors in the ring. Managing these physiological and psychological changes becomes a vital skill for fighters.

Read More: Indian Philosophical Perspectives on Anxiety and FearHistorical PerspectiveIn prehistoric times, fear was essential for survival since there were predators all around. It was the fear of getting hurt or mauled that made us run away. While fear once meant survival, today it’s a mental opponent in the ring. It doesn’t matter if one is getting his face pounded in or his ribs are being cracked up from the punches. The fight will stop only when they are no longer conscious or if they have given up. Taking words from fighters’ accounts, no feeling is worse than watching yourself get upbeat in front of millions. Fear can stem from many things. The fear of getting injured is beyond repair. Also, the fear of a career-ending concussion. The fear of getting a loss on the record. The fear stems not just from physical pain but from the humiliation, the tarnished legacy, and an overwhelming sense of failure.

Ensuring business continuity and supporting private sector development in Qatar

Sheikh Faisal bin Qassim Al Thani: Praise be to God that our country, Qatar, has been successful at management. Its management is exemplary in many aspects. The country has a great global standing, with good relationships built on mutual respect and shared interests with other countries. This is attractive to investors both from Qatar and abroad.I believe that Qatar will one day become one of the most important commercial centres in the world, just like Singapore and Hong Kong. We have the potential to become like these countries. When Doha created Al Dafna, and towers were built there, it was the private sector that built 70-80% of them. The Pearl was also built by the private sector, where as the government focused on building infrastructure.The same applies to Lusail. The government ensured compliance with quality standards, and so on. The same approach was followed in the manufacturing sector, as in Mesaieed Industrial City. The more opportunities the government offers, whether in manufacturing, business, real estate, or any other sector, the more creative businessmen, citizens, and entrepreneurs are.Sheikh Mohammed Bin Faisal Al Thani: Much investment has been made in the country, especially in infrastructure. If we look at the airport today in Qatar, it is one of the leading airports globally. One of the advantages that we have today is the new port in Doha, which makes accessibility in Qatar much easier. The free zone is also one of the key strengths of the market here, offering a one-stop shop and all the foundations required for any manufacturing business. These are all aspects that provide a great opportunity for any business or investor that is looking to invest in Qatar.Tarek El Sayed: As part of its economic diversification strategy, Qatar has been focusing on improving its hospitality sector to make it a world-class tourist destination. Al Faisal Holding has created an iconic hotel portfolio through its fully-owned subsidiary, ARTIC. As of early 2024, the ARTIC portfolio had 35 hotels, 12 of which are in Qatar. The remaining are elsewhere in the MENA region, Europe and the US. Al Faisal Holding was one of the first Qatari companies to successfully expand its operations overseas.Sheikh Turki Bin Faisal Al Thani: Al Faisal Holding is a very diverse company that is investing in many different sectors. Having access to the knowledge of those sectors is hugely beneficial to Al Jazi Real Estate. One of the main points of knowledge that we have is the impact of digital transformation on these different sectors.Sherif Shehata: We are starting to think about the next vision, which will focus on health IT. We will continue our business in medical equipment and pharmaceuticals, and we will expand into health IT. We managed to secure a significant countrywide project with the Hospital Information Exchange (HIE) initiative, as well as track-and-trace for medications, which will enhance healthcare services in Qatar.Sheikh Jassim Bin Faisal Al Thani: Qatar National Vision 2030 provides the main guidelines for investors to choose the sectors they want to invest in. We are beginning to recognise that environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles have become critically important to investors. As a private equity investor, we place great importance on ESG.Sheikha Al Jazi Bin Faisal Al Thani: Qatar has become a cultural hub by showcasing its local heritage and also hosting and displaying its global heritage. The population of Qatar is growing at a fast pace, and it is ethnically and nationally diverse. This have provided the country an opportunity to become a cultural hub for both local and global heritage. We have created one of the largest private museums in the world, the Sheikh Faisal Bin Qassim Al Thani Museum. It houses more than 17,000 artefacts and covers over 25,000 square meters in size. The museum is a symbol of our commitment to the local community, and to nurturing a place for heritage for future generations to enjoy.Mona El Helbawi: The museum launched an international exhibition, “The Majlis – Cultures in Dialogue,” and it has traveled to many European cities and countries, visiting under the patronage of UNESCO. Culture, education, and sports have been essential pillars at Al Faisal Holding. This is due to the vision of the founder, Sheikh Faisal, over the past 40 years.This focus comes not just from his vision, but also, I believe, from a true passion for investing in future generations. Many organizations have been established within the sports sector, such as the Sheikh Faisal Sports Academy, which is affiliated with various national federations in Qatar and the Olympic Committee. We also have the Al Samriya Riding School, which operates in line with international equestrian standards in terms of facilities and programs.Mohammad Ramahi: Al Faisal Holding operates in a dynamic environment, leveraging the strength of its diversified operations. This diversification allows us to mitigate risks and navigate fluctuations in economic conditions and market terms.Ali Mahmoudy: We are a group with more than 60 years of heritage, which is why we need to have solid corporate governance that will ensure family succession, and meet business needs in a rapidly changing environment. In today’s world, we are living in a very complex business environment that pushes all groups to be agile and ensures good corporate governance. This is essential to growing our footprint while preserving our heritage.Abdulrazzaq Kuwari: Currently, Al Faisal Holding has a very robust procurement department. We focus mainly on supporting small and medium local businesses here, depending on their specialty. We look into the companies in terms of how we can support them, offering assistance to all our entities, and following international best practices.Rashid Al Mansoori: Aamal was one of the first companies listed on the Qatar Stock Exchange (QSE) in 2007. The chairman, Sheikh Faisal, has been a key player in the Qatari economy for 60 years. When he was thinking of listing Aamal, he selected a number of companies that were suitable to be listed on the stock exchange. He thus created a catalyst and motivated other companies in Qatar to list on the QSE, as they saw the success of Aamal in capital markets. If you consider the current cost of finance, the listing of family-owned companies is a more affordable means of financing and raising capital.Sheikh Faisal bin Qassim Al Thani: The most important element of success is adhering to highly moral values, and to want for others what you want for yourself. Do not look at competitors as enemies. The market is big enough, and each investor will get their share. You should not try to control the whole market.If you do that, you will fail. Look at competitors as brothers, and support one another. That is better than competing. I was lucky to choose the right people to start this journey with me.I chose people who loved to work. This is the most important pillar of success. The people working with me are more important than capital or any other factor. In the last few years, I have aimed to have an impact on the Qatari, Arab, and global societies.I started with charity work through the Al Faisal Without Borders Foundation, which is focused on education. We try to try to educate others as much as possible; I believe that education is what matters. It is the one thing nobody can take away. If you offer someone something to eat or wear, it will be consumed quickly – but if you provide them with education, they and their family will evolve.Sheikh Mohammed Bin Faisal Al Thani: Qatar had humble beginnings, starting with the discovery of oil. Today it has transformed into a more sustainable economy that is less reliant on the hydrocarbons sector. All this has been achieved by having a vision and a private sector that supports that vision. At Al Faisal Holding, we are very proud of what has been achieved over 60 years.Sheikh Tamim Bin Faisal Al Thani: Al Faisal Holding is an excellent example of a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME), as it started as a small business founded by my father, Sheikh Faisal. Over time, it grew bigger and bigger, and now it is one of the most diverse companies in the country, setting an example of what can be achieved by SMEs. You always have to start with something, even if it is something small.Sheikh Thani Bin Faisal Al Thani: I believe family businesses provide strong foundations for younger generations, as they encourage entrepreneurship. One thing that makes me proud is that we are always together. When I see people working, I see a family working.Sheikh Khaled Bin Faisal Al Thani: If you go back 20 years, there were only a few people involved in the private sector. Today, many hundreds of Qataris are joining the private sector. They have their own businesses; it has become part of the culture. A lot of Qataris, once they grow up and finish high school, start thinking about what to do to create their own business. There is a lot of encouragement from the government for growth. There is also a lot of encouragement for foreign investment, so there is much potential to be seen over the next 10 years.

Starbucks Explores Selling Shares In China Business Amid Growth Plans: Report

Starbucks is currently weighing its options regarding its Chinese operations and considering the possibility of selling shares in the business to a local partner, according to a report.The international coffee chain, which has been experiencing declining demand for its beverages in key markets like the U.S. and China, has been in discussions with advisers to consider bringing a local partner on board, Bloomberg reported, citing people in knowledge of the matter. ‘This development comes as Starbucks aims to revamp its U.S. stores while gaining a deeper insight into its operations in China. The company has been actively gauging interest from potential investors, including domestic private equity firms.A stake sale could also attract interest from Chinese conglomerates or local firms with industry expertise. However, Starbucks is still in the evaluation phase and has not made a final decision.The coffee chain has been under a lot of pressure from Elliott Investment Management, which wants the company to thoroughly review its Chinese business. This approach is not unprecedented, as similar restaurant chains like McDonald’s and Yum! Brands have opted to sell shares to local entities to better harness growth and cater to local tastes.China ranks second in terms of global market share of Starbucks. The Chinese market alone generated approximately US$3 billion of net revenue in the most recent financial year, thanks to an extensive store expansion in the country.Earlier this week, a spokesperson for Starbucks said that the company is “fully committed to our business and partners, and to growing in China.””We are working to find the best path to growth, which includes exploring strategic partnerships,” the spokesperson added.Meanwhile, under the leadership of new CEO Brian Niccol, Starbucks is focused on improving employee work conditions, an issue that’s become so prevalent that it led to unionization. Niccol plans to tackle operational challenges by increasing staffing in 3,000 stores and implementing the Siren Craft System — a legacy from former CEO Laxman Narasimhan — to streamline operations and minimize bottlenecks.Niccol wants to recover the brand by making Starbucks more employee-friendly like his previous employer, Chipotle, which has seen its shares increase by 31%.This year, Starbucks shares have underperformed, with its stock currently valued at 3 times its total sales in 2023. This is lower than McDonald’s, which is valued at 8 times its sales, and Dutch Bros, which is valued at 3.7 times its sales.

‘A Traveler’s Needs’ Review: Language Lessons

Iris (Isabelle Huppert), a stranger who teaches French in Seoul, is at the center of an enigmatic film by Hong Sang-soo.“Why’d she come to Korea?” a man (Kwon Hae-hyo) asks his wife (Lee Hye-young) in the park, as Iris (Isabelle Huppert) is walking away from them. Iris is a stranger in Seoul who has started teaching French to the wife. Whether Iris is up to the task is uncertain. She has no background in instruction, and the only language that she and her pupils share is English, which is not a native tongue for any of them.Iris takes an oddball approach to acclimating her students to French: She extracts personal confessions from them in English, then writes wildly extrapolated versions of the French on index cards. “You’ll love your true emotion being expressed in a foreign language,” she says. Better that than to learn phrases from a textbook — something she declines to use. She is also a fiend for makgeolli, the Korean rice wine, of which she claims to drink one or two bottles every day.Is Iris for real? That question hangs over “A Traveler’s Needs,” just as it does over the career of the director Hong Sang-soo. Hong routinely turns out two features per year with methods nearly as baffling as Iris’s: His devotees see infinite subtlety in his use of theme and variation, while the skeptical can’t help but wonder if his movies have become increasingly repetitive and slapdash. In “A Traveler’s Needs,” which won second prize at the Berlin International Film Festival, the sunlit interiors often suggest a deliberately amateurish look.This is his third overall feature with Huppert, who adds drollery and an air of mystery. And there is just enough intrigue this time — one motif involves the difficulty of translating a work by Yoon Dong-ju, a Korean poet who died in 1945 after being imprisoned in Japan — to suggest hidden depths.A Traveler’s NeedsNot rated. In English, Korean (with subtitles) and French. Running time: 1 hour 30 minutes. In theaters.

Deaths of at Least 4 Tourists in Laos Raise Alarm About Tainted Drinks

Travelers from the United States, Australia and Denmark have died in the Southeast Asian nation in recent days. Officials warned of poisoning caused by alcoholic drinks containing methanol.At least four people traveling in Laos, including an American, have died in recent days as officials in Australia and New Zealand said there had likely been an outbreak of methanol poisoning there caused by tainted alcoholic drinks.Penny Wong, Australia’s foreign minister, said on Thursday that Bianca Jones, an Australian, had died in Thailand, where she had been brought after becoming sick in Laos.Ms. Jones, 19, had been hospitalized last week after consuming an alcoholic drink in Laos, said Col. Phattanawong Chanphon, the superintendent of the police station in Muang Udon Thani, the town in Thailand where she died. He said the cause was swelling in the brain caused by methanol.It was unclear whether three other deaths of foreign travelers reported this week in Laos, a landlocked nation in Southeast Asia that is popular with backpackers, had been caused by methanol.The State Department said in an emailed statement on Thursday that an American had died in Vang Vieng, a tourist town in Laos. It did not offer details.The Associated Press reported that two Australian women in the same town had been sickened after taking shots of Lao vodka offered to them by a hostel where they were staying, citing a manager of the hostel.Methanol, a toxic chemical used in household and industrial products like antifreeze, is sometimes added to drinks as a cheaper alternative to ethanol, the alcohol used in alcoholic beverages.Australia’s Foreign Ministry said in an advisory this week that it suspected several Australians had gotten methanol poisoning from consuming alcoholic drinks in Laos this month. It warned travelers to be wary of risks with spirit-based drinks, including cocktails.New Zealand’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Thursday that its embassy in Bangkok, which oversees Laos, had been contacted by a citizen who was ill and had likely suffered methanol poisoning in Laos.Denmark’s Foreign Ministry said earlier this week that two Danish citizens had died in Laos. The ministry did not specify whether the deaths were linked to methanol poisoning.Another Australian, Holly Bowles, a friend of Ms. Jones who the Thai authorities said had been drinking with her, remained hospitalized in Thailand with a critical illness, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of Australia said on Thursday. Ryn Jirenuwat

Editorial: Meet the new ‘head tax’: Brandon Johnson’s business levy could cause companies to flee for the suburbs

Mayor Brandon Johnson’s administration has been hunting frantically for politically palatable tax hikes to replace the $300 million property tax increase Chicago aldermen rejected unanimously last week.One of the heftiest proposals on the table is an increase in the personal property lease tax on cloud computing — bear with us, we’ll explain what that is in English — which the mayor’s office says would raise $128 million annually. That’s an enormous sum of money, so our curiosity was piqued.Who would pay that? And what would be the impact?This levy effectively is a city sales tax on what businesses pay to license cloud-based software, a critical tool for virtually any modern office. It turns out that this tax, which at the current 9% could well be the nation’s highest on this essential service, behaves like a per-employee tax on all but the smallest of businesses located in Chicago.The mayor’s office wants to hike the exorbitant existing rate to 11%, exceeding even the absurdly high 10.25% sales tax ordinary Chicagoans pay on most purchases. If the City Council approves the increase, the risk is that more than a few of the professional-services firms that have been the source of much of the city’s job growth over the past few decades may well view this measure as the final straw and simply move some or all of their operations out of town.They won’t have to go far if they opt to vamoose. Chicago’s suburbs generally don’t tax business licensing of cloud-based software.By way of background, Chicago is one of a very few cities in the U.S. to impose a sales tax on businesses’ use of cloud-based software, which powers many basic computerized functions of day-to-day work life — email, accounting and the like. Some states (not a majority) do so, although not at rates anywhere near Chicago’s. The state of Illinois taxes business licensing of some software, but the types of transactions the state targets aren’t nearly as expansive as Chicago’s.The city has taxed computer services for business in some form or another for three decades. For the early part of that period, the tax was reasonably straightforward. The 21st-century advent of the cloud, which enabled software licensors to serve customers without need for downloads or other tangible methods, complicated matters. The city applied the tax to the cloud beginning in 2015. Initially, the rate at which Chicago taxed cloud-based software was lower than other software methods, but it wasn’t long before the city applied the same rate to all software licenses. The city increased the rate to 9% from 7.25% in 2021, not coincidentally the last time the city faced a budget shortfall of more than $1 billion.It’s not surprising that mayors turn to this tax in times of budgetary stress. The levy is hard to understand, and isn’t nearly as high-profile as the hated property tax. It’s easy for increases to fly under the radar.For the city, however, the problem with turning to this source of revenue time and again is that businesses can reduce the cost of the levy simply by moving employees out of Chicago. Why? When a business has Chicago as its billing address, the city’s tax collectors assume all of its workers are here and impose the 9% tax on the full cost of its software services. But businesses can reduce their tax bill by demonstrating to the city that only a percentage of its workers are in Chicago.So, for example, if a business with a Chicago billing address employs just 25% of its workforce in the city, it has to pay taxes to the city on only 25% of its software costs.In other words, there’s a built-in incentive for companies doing business in Chicago to move their workers to the suburbs if this tax becomes sufficiently onerous. Such moves are a hassle both to employers and their workers, but in an era of remote work that hassle is reduced.Is 11% high enough to prod Chicago companies to consider a suburban move? Inertia is a powerful force, but we think 11% would start getting the attention of many a chief financial officer.“In my experience, companies will consider leaving the city of Chicago if it means not being subject to a tax that’s such an outlier,” Samantha Breslow, a tax attorney with Kirkpatrick Townsend & Stockton specializing in state and local tax matters for businesses, told us Wednesday.In our discussions with business representatives around town, word seems to be getting out slowly about this potential $128 million revenue grab at the expense of their constituents. Maybe they should think of the issue this way: Would a revival of the so-called head tax, the per-worker levy the city used to impose on businesses until Rahm Emanuel ended the job-killing practice more than a decade ago, get their attention more quickly?The cloud-based software tax is a not-so-distant cousin of the head tax. The city’s business community ought to treat it as such and make their voices heard. Thus far, the floating of the software-tax hike has been met with nary a public word from detractors that we’ve heard.Brandon Johnson has spent far too much of his mayoral term obsessing over where to find more money to finance his progressive agenda. He and too many of his aldermanic allies have ignored a deteriorating business environment that’s at the root of their fiscal woes.A confiscatory tax on an essential tool for modern business only will further fuel the economic headwinds afflicting Chicago. Aldermen should kill the increase, just as they did the $300 million property tax hike.Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email [email protected].

Infrastructure Ontario ‘worked with’ engineering firm ahead of science centre closure report

Key details of an engineering report that led to the permanent closure of the Ontario Science Centre were known and actively discussed by senior staff at Infrastructure Ontario (IO) eight days before the findings were presented to the attraction’s board of directors, Global News has learned, something the Crown corporation says is standard practice.
Internal texts and emails, obtained using freedom of information laws, show staff had conversations about details in the report and its recommendations, including when the attraction would have to be vacated, before it was submitted.Text messages also suggest executives at Infrastructure Ontario were in direct contact with figures at Rimkus while they were working on the expert report, raising questions about what role the government’s Crown agency played in shaping the final product.Infrastructure Ontario, however, said the move is a standard practice in finalizing an independent expert report. Story continues below advertisement

“Following normal industry processes, IO worked with Rimkus to ensure that the final report captured the relevant information that was required to present to government and the Ontario Science Centre Board of Trustees in order for them to have all the facts necessary to make an informed decision,” a spokesperson said.The Ford government also underscored that the report was “written solely by Rimkus” and that no one else had input on how it was completed.“Non-partisan Ministry of Infrastructure officials were kept informed by Infrastructure Ontario (IO) of safety concerns of the Ontario Science Centre (OSC) facility and potential outcomes prior to the final Rimkus report,” the premier’s office said.

More on Politics
More videos

“The Rimkus report was also reviewed by an independent third party engineering firm who validated that the data presented in the report was sound. No non-partisan MOI officials, nor minister’s staff, nor Premier’s office staff were part of the discussion in the writing of the final report.”Critics at Queen’s Park charged that the decision to close the science centre was baked in, even before final advice was given.“Here we have just another example of how this government was making a decision before there was any actual rationale,” Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said on Wednesday.The government remains adamant the process to close the science centre in June of this year flowed as quickly as it could and was guided by safety concerns — pointing to the fact the minister was only briefed after the final report was submitted as evidence no premature calls had been made. Story continues below advertisement

“The final decision to close the Ontario Science Centre to the public was made by the Ontario Science Centre board at their meeting on June 20th,” the premier’s office said.“It was agreed that the facility would be closed to the public effectively by end of day June 21st.”

Details of the report

On June 12, nine days before the closure, Infrastructure Ontario staff began sharing high-level details of the Rimkus report in order to ensure “consistency” with the communications plan.Officials were well aware that “the condition of roof panels above the Great Hall and elsewhere require closure by Oct. 31” and that the building faced other operational challenges including heating and the pedestrian bridge.“Adding all of those details together, the government has made a decision out of an abundance of caution to close to the public before summer,” the internal email read. Story continues below advertisement

Text messages between Infrastructure Ontario CEO Michael Lindsay and the agency’s top communications staffer appear to suggest the agency was in contact with Rimkus about its expert report before it was submitted.One text, sent before the final report was finished, referenced Lindsay having seen “executives at Rimkus,” suggesting the two sides had been in communication.

Get daily National news
Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Then, when the final report was sent, a member of the Rimkus team also seemed to reference conversations that had taken place.“Please refer to revised final summary report (R2) attached, with updated notes/paragraphs, as discussed,” they wrote on June 18.Infrastructure Ontario did not directly address questions from Global News about if it had seen an early version of the report but documents show officials knew enough to create a detailed slide deck on June 14 that was almost identical to the final briefing given to the board of directors.The premier’s office said the report followed the “conventional process” within government and news products were created based on potential outcomes.“Non-partisan officials try to anticipate the needs of the Minister and staff prior to presenting information, including preparing products and considering potential responses,” a spokesperson said.A slide on the roof  condition written before the final report was submitted:

Global News

A slide on the roof condition presented in the final June 21 briefing:

Global News

Ministry helps shape plan

Internal communications that were sent as part of the drafting of the briefing deck also acknowledged the government would get the ultimate say on how the move was presented. Story continues below advertisement

“I hesitate to ask that you go into edit/rewrite mode yet because I suspect there will be considerable edits once this goes through the ministry approvals blender,” one email said on June 17, three days before it was presented to the board of directors.The next day, an email from the government to Infrastructure Ontario suggested it had not done enough to drive home the key message about the roof.“Roof Structure Slide — it’s not clear that the slide on the Roof Structure is hitting the mark,” they wrote on June 18.“Reporters need to walk away with a very clear understanding of what the problem is, what has been done, and what the engineering recommendation is.”Text messages to Lindsay also reference PO — shorthand for the premier’s office — helping with the communications strategy.“I spoke with PO today and if the summary says the right things to highlight, then they might avoid having a tech briefing,” a text received by Lindsay from his communications chief on the day the report was submitted said.Timeline: June 11: Draft media products are sent by the government to Infrastructure Ontario for review.June 14: A version of the news release says out of an “abundance of caution, effective today” Ontario Science Centre will close.June 17: A plan put in place to begin fencing off Ontario Science Centre is approved.June 18: The Rimkus engineering report is officially submitted to Infrastructure Ontario.June 19: Minister of Infrastructure Kinga Surma formally briefed on the closure plan. A dry run of tech briefing is also organized.June 20: The Ontario Science Centre board is briefed on the engineering report. It votes unanimously in favour of closure.June 21: Ontario Science Centre closure announced. Hours later, the building is shuttered. Story continues below advertisement

Ontario Liberal MPP Adil Shamji, who represents the riding where the science centre is located, said the communications suggested the decision to close the science centre over the state of its roof was made long before it was announced.“It speaks to something that we’ve actually already suspected — that the abrupt closure of the Ontario Science Centre was premeditated,” he said.“It was predetermined that this government did not want to see the Ontario Science Centre continue in the place that it occupies right now. They spent a week, or quite possibly longer, establishing a communications, crisis management plan that could give them the opportunity to say that they had no choice whatsoever in shutting it down.”

Minister briefed after news release drafted

The documents also show that, while Minister Kinga Surma was not briefed until two days before the decision, staff were working on an official response to attribute to her well before. Story continues below advertisement

A draft news release, shared internally on June 14, includes a quote to be attributed to Surma, explaining a closure that she had apparently not yet been briefed on.“Based on new information from Rimkus Consulting Group, and the findings from the Ontario Science Centre business case, the difficult decision has been made to close the current facility to members of the public and allow for the decant of the facility over the coming months,” Surma said in the draft news release.“At the same time, we are taking steps to ensure Ontarians can continue to benefit from the Science Centre’s important programs and experiences in new ways.”The quote was ultimately not used and Surma herself was briefed early on June 19, according to both the premier’s office and the internal emails.

A briefing slide shared on June 14 with the messages Infrastructure Ontario wanted to communicate about the science centre closure.

Global News

During question period on Wednesday, Progressive Conservative House Leader Steve Clark said the decision to close the Ontario Science Centre was made by the board of directors at the science centre, not the government. Story continues below advertisement

“The decision to close the science centre came by the board of directors itself,” Clark said, also referencing the Rimkus report.“The opposition would be the first ones to howl and howl and howl that this board ignored the report. The board did not ignore the report and the government did not ignore the report.”Minutes of science centre board meetings also obtained by Global News, however, show the board found out about the plan to close the attraction after work had begun.After Surma was briefed on the science centre closure plan on June 19, an email was sent to board members informing them an “emergency virtual board meeting” was being convened for the next day.“Please make every effort to attend and confirm your availability,” an email to board members said. “I apologize for the late notice and appreciate your patience as we address the many moving parts.”The board did not vote to close the science centre until June 20, the day before the announcement was made. By then, a contract was in place to fence off the building, the minister had been briefed on the plan and a slew of communications materials had been written.“It clearly wasn’t urgent to shut down the science centre — otherwise the government would have acted with urgency,” Ontario Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said. Story continues below advertisement

“And that confirms what architects and engineers have told us, that the science centre did not need to be immediately shut down. And the premier’s only reason for doing it was politically motivated.”

Related News

Big business heeds President’s call to avoid lavish Christmas parties

MANILA, Philippines — Big business heeded the call of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to avoid lavish Christmas parties and instead give the money to their employees as additional incentives.”A lot of our member companies will give the money to their employees as an additional benefit rather than spend it on extravagant parties,” said Sergio Ortiz-Luiz, president of the Employers Confederation of the Philippines (ECOP).

Register to read this story and more for free.
Signing up for an account helps us improve your browsing experience.
Continue
OR
See our subscription options.

Already have an account? Log in here

10 Book Embossers and Book Stamps to Gift the Reader in Your Life

Julia is a professional nerd who can be spotted in the wild lounging with books in the park in Brooklyn, NY. She has a BA in International Studies from the University of Chicago and an MA in Media Studies from Pratt Institute. She loves fandom, theater, cheese, and Edith Piaf. Find her at juliarittenberg.com.
View All posts by Julia Rittenberg

When arranging your home library, there are a number of design decisions. After arranging your bookshelves, you choose how to organize the books on your shelves. Whether you’re sorting by author, color, genre, or the Dewey Decimal System itself, you want to be able to find your necessary books quickly. When assembling a book collection, I also want to mark books that are precious to me. Whether it’s a mass-market paperback or a decorative cloth-bound special edition with painted edges, it’s fun to add your own mark with a book embosser or book stamp.
As much fun as it is to organize my own library, I also enjoy looking in secondhand shops for books. Finding people’s old notes, old stamped library cards, and other random ephemera in the book makes it a great addition to the historical record. Adding designs to my own books could be a way of participating in that process of book history that I love personally. Having a stamp or embossment gives the book a little character that could be fun for the next owner of a book that I donate or leave in a Little Free Library.

Book embossers and stamps are also a great personalized gift for your book-loving friends. You can find the perfect themed one for fans of any genre. Many of the stamps listed here can also be purchased as embossers, so there are options for each type of decoration.

Decorative Book Embossers

Image from TwinSoulStudioStamps on Etsy

Custom Library Embosser, Moon Phases: This book embosser with moon decoration would be great for science fiction, fantasy, or astrology fans. $45, or $20 as a stamp

.container .newsletter-signup { background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #03e8fc, #c20eeb 95%)}

The Goods Newsletter

Sign up to The Goods to receive emails about rad bookish items that will make your reading life a little better.

Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

Image from StampCampCo on Etsy

Dragon Library Stamp: Fantasy fans can show off their favorite genre with this dragon guarding their bookish treasures. $42