shaped like a book, oscar tusquets’ bib luz lamp discreetly integrates into any shelf

Oscar Tusquets’ Bib Luz lamp effectively illuminates books’ spinesSanta & Cole presents Bib Luz, a lamp conceived by Oscar Tusquets in 1986 to discern the books’ spines on his shelf. Spanish architect Oscar Tusquets faced the challenge of illuminating bookshelves effectively. Instead of relying on conventional methods, he designed Bib Luz, a lamp that integrates into any shelf while enhancing the visibility of book spines. Unlike traditional bookcase lighting, often placed at the back and inadequate for practical use, Tusquets’ innovative solution brought the light source forward, creating perspective and clarity.Shaped like a book, Bib Luz houses its transformer and switch within its body, from which a rigid metal arm extends vertically. At its tip, a spotlight illuminates bookshelves without casting shadows, blending utility with artistic elegance. This ingenious, poetic design approaching figurative and oneiric imagery embodies Tusquets’ avant-garde spirit and reveals the creative synergies and friendship between Salvador Dalí and the designer. In 1998, lighting designer Ingo Maurer paid tribute to Bib Luz by creating the Oskar lamp, a reinterpretation with a shorter, flexible arm and more utilitarian design. Although differing in execution and quite disconnected from the book metaphor, Maurer’s homage highlighted the originality and influence of Tusquets’ design.all images by Coke Bartrina unless stated otherwiseSanta & Cole presents a new edition of Bib Luz lampReflecting on the design’s philosophy, Tusquets explains:‘If I place a lamp on a shelf, all the lower ones remain in shadow. Only by bringing the light source forward can I illuminate all the spines of the books. I then have a body with a stem and a small bulb at its tip. The body, which houses the transformer and the switch, must be able to be positioned anywhere on the shelf, take up little space, and go unnoticed. What can I imagine better than a book?’Global publisher of design objects, art, and books, Santa & Cole now presents a definitive edition of Bib Luz, conceived by architect Oscar Tusquets, incorporating modern improvements while preserving its original poetic essence. Featuring two finishes—off-white and aluminum grey—and an updated LED light source, the lamp ensures superior optics and energy efficiency. The metallic arm clicks easily into place, offering adjustable illumination. For added flexibility, multiple units can be connected in series using a single wall plug, enabling stunning compositions across various shelf levels. The updated design delivers precise, non-dazzling lighting that highlights bookshelves while maintaining a minimal visual footprint.Santa & Cole presents Bib Luz, a lamp conceived by Oscar Tusquets to illuminate the books’ spines effectivelyBib Luz integrates into any shelf, bringing light forward to enhance visibility with clarity and precisionshaped like a book, Bib Luz combines functionality and artistry, housing its transformer and switch within its bodya rigid metal arm extends vertically from Bib Luz, ending in a spotlight that illuminates without casting shadowsTusquets’ innovative design brought the light source outside the shelf, solving the issue of poorly lit bookshelves

The science behind intermittent fasting and its impact on cellular aging

Intermittent fasting has gained popularity in recent years as a strategy not only for weight loss, but also to improve overall health and prolong life. This dietary approach involves alternating periods of food intake with periods of fasting, which can have significant effects on metabolism and cell biology. Recent research has begun to unravel the science behind intermittent fasting and its impact on cellular aging.Biological mechanisms of intermittent fastingIntermittent fasting triggers a range of biological responses that can influence cellular aging:Autophagy: During fasting, cells activate a process called autophagy, where they eliminate damaged components and recycle proteins. This process is crucial for maintaining cellular health and preventing age-related diseases.Reduction of oxidative stress: it can decrease levels of oxidative stress, which is associated with cellular damage and aging. By reducing this stress, cells can be protected from accumulated damage.Hormonal regulation: Intermittent fasting affects hormones related to metabolism, such as insulin and growth hormone. Reduced insulin levels during fasting can improve sensitivity to this hormone, which is beneficial for metabolic health.Impact on cellular agingStudies have shown that intermittent fasting can have positive effects on cellular aging:Research in animal models has shown that it can extend lifespan by improving cellular processes related to longevity.Disease prevention: It has been associated with a lower incidence of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and certain types of cancer, all of which are related to ageing.Cognitive enhancement: Some studies suggest that intermittent fasting may have neuroprotective effects, improving cognitive function and reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.Before starting any fasting regimen, especially if you have pre-existing medical conditions or are taking medication, it is essential to consult a health professional.

Scientists are actively working on breeding hypoallergenic cats

A group of scientists from the biotech company InBio, Texas A&M University and the University of Michigan have made significant progress in developing hypoallergenic cats using genetic editing, gazeta.ru reports with reference to PNAS Nexus.

The team focused on the genes CH1 and CH2, which are responsible for the production of the allergen Fel d 1, which is produced in various glands in cats. The scientists conducted a large-scale comparison of the genetic sequences of more than 276 domestic and wild cats, including pumas, cheetahs, lions, tigers and jaguars.

An intriguing discovery is that the function of the Fel d 1 protein remains unclear. It is thought to be involved in immune regulation, skin protection, or interspecies communication. At the same time, genetically modified cats without the CH2 gene appear completely healthy.

Of particular interest were findings in the puma and black-footed cat from South Africa, which were found to have mutations that prevent the allergen from being produced, further supporting the hypothesis that Fel d 1 may not play a critical role in cats.

Using CRISPR gene editing technology, scientists hope to create cats that will not cause allergic reactions in humans.

Scientists are actively working on breeding hypoallergenic cats

A group of scientists from the biotech company InBio, Texas A&M University and the University of Michigan have made significant progress in developing hypoallergenic cats using genetic editing, gazeta.ru reports with reference to PNAS Nexus.

The team focused on the genes CH1 and CH2, which are responsible for the production of the allergen Fel d 1, which is produced in various glands in cats. The scientists conducted a large-scale comparison of the genetic sequences of more than 276 domestic and wild cats, including pumas, cheetahs, lions, tigers and jaguars.

An intriguing discovery is that the function of the Fel d 1 protein remains unclear. It is thought to be involved in immune regulation, skin protection, or interspecies communication. At the same time, genetically modified cats without the CH2 gene appear completely healthy.

Of particular interest were findings in the puma and black-footed cat from South Africa, which were found to have mutations that prevent the allergen from being produced, further supporting the hypothesis that Fel d 1 may not play a critical role in cats.

Using CRISPR gene editing technology, scientists hope to create cats that will not cause allergic reactions in humans.

The week’s bestselling books, Dec. 1

Hardcover fiction1. James by Percival Everett (Doubleday: $28) An action-packed reimagining of “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.” 2. The City and Its Uncertain Walls by Haruki Murakami (Knopf: $35) The acclaimed writer returns with a love story and ode to books and to the libraries that house them. 3. Intermezzo by Sally Rooney (Farrar, Straus & Giroux: $29) Two grieving brothers come to terms with their history and the people they love. 4. The God of the Woods by Liz Moore (Riverhead Books: $30) Two worlds collide when a teenager vanishes from her Adirondacks summer camp. 5. The Grey Wolf by Louise Penny (Minotaur: $30) The 19th mystery in the Armand Gamache series.6. All Fours by Miranda July (Riverhead Books: $29) A woman upends her domestic life in this irreverent and tender novel. 7. Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan (Grove Press: $20) During the 1985 Christmas season, a coal merchant in an Irish village makes a troubling discovery. 8. The Waiting by Michael Connelly (Little, Brown & Co.: $30) LAPD Det. Renée Ballard tracks a serial rapist whose trail has gone cold. 9. Playground by Richard Powers (W.W. Norton & Co.: $30) The Pacific Ocean-set novel explores one of the last wild places we have yet to colonize. 10. Tell Me Everything by Elizabeth Strout (Random House: $30) A return to the town of Crosby, Maine, and its colorful cast of characters. …Hardcover nonfiction1. The Serviceberry by Robin Wall Kimmerer, John Burgoyne (Illus.) (Scribner: $20) The “Braiding Sweetgrass” author on gratitude, reciprocity and community, and the lessons to take from the natural world. 2. Revenge of the Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell (Little, Brown & Co.: $32) The bestselling author reframes the lessons of his first book 25 years later. 3. Didion and Babitz by Lili Anolik (Scribner: $30) In the journalist’s provocative new work, Eve Babitz’s diary-like letters provide a window into her fellow literary titan, Joan Didion. 4. The Message by Ta-Nehisi Coates (One World: $30) The National Book Award winner travels to three sites of conflict to explore how the stories we tell, and the ones we don’t, shape our realities. 5. Genesis by Henry A. Kissinger, Eric Schmidt, Craig Mundie (Little, Brown & Co.: $30) In his final book, the late statesman joins forces with two technologists to explore the challenges of AI. 6. Cher by Cher (Dey Street Books: $36) The superstar reveals her true story in the first of a two-part memoir. 7. Be Ready When the Luck Happens by Ina Garten (Crown: $34) The Barefoot Contessa shares the story of her rise in the food world.8. Nexus by Yuval by Noah Harari (Random House: $35) How the flow of information has shaped us and our world across the centuries. 9. From Under the Truck by Josh Brolin (Harper: $30) The actor recounts his unconventional childhood and career. 10. The Memory Palace by Nate DiMeo (Random House: $33) A collection of offbeat tales from American history. …Paperback fiction1. The Frozen River by Ariel Lawhon (Vintage: $18)2. Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver (Harper Perennial: $22)3. Orbital by Samantha Harvey (Grove Press: $17)4. The Vegetarian by Han Kang (Hogarth: $17)5. Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin (Vintage: $19)6. My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante (Europa Editions: $17)7. The Nightingale by Kristin Hannah (St. Martin’s Griffin: $18)8. The Best American Short Stories 2024 by Lauren Groff, Heidi Pitlor (Editors) (Mariner Books: $20)9. North Woods by Daniel Mason (Random House Trade Paperbacks: $18)10. The Berry Pickers by Amanda Peters (Catapult: $18)…Paperback nonfiction1. On Tyranny by Timothy Snyder (Crown: $12)2. The Art Thief by Michael Finkel (Vintage: $18)3. The Backyard Bird Chronicles by Amy Tan (Knopf: $35)4. Say Nothing by Patrick Radden Keefe (Vintage: $20)5. The Pirate’s Wife by Daphne Palmer Geanacopoulos (Hanover Square Press: $22)6. The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion (Vintage: $18)7. Greenlights by Matthew McConaughey (Crown: $20)8. The Eater Guide to Los Angeles by Eater (Abrams Image: $20)9. Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion (Farrar, Straus & Giroux: $18)10. Crying in H Mart by Michelle Zauner (Vintage: $17) More to Read

Writing Advice, Book Recommendations, and More from the Newest Literary MacArthur Fellows

Last month, the MacArthur Foundation announced its latest fellowship class—unofficially known as the “Genius Grant,” the MacArthur Fellowship awards $800,000 “to extraordinarily talented and creative individuals as an investment in their potential.”Article continues after advertisementRemove Ads
Literary Hub caught up with four of the 2024 winners—Jericho Brown, Ling Ma, Jason Reynolds, and Juan Felipe Herrera—to ask about their cultural touchstones, their literary educations, and the best (and worst) writing advice they’ve ever received.
Here’s what they told us:
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Jericho Brown
What’s the best or worst writing advice you’ve ever received?The best writing advice I ever got comes by way of example. I noticed that the writers I admire most spent their time reading and writing, that reading the work that inspires them and committing to time set aside for creation is a part of their lives as much as eating dinner or walking the dog.
The worst advice I ever got still comes to me in the form of accusatory questions about when my next book is going to appear. My job is well-wrought writing. My job is not the production of a book every so many years. There is this sense that we should be in a rush, but for what? For whom?Article continues after advertisementRemove Ads
Who is the person, or what is the place or practice that had the most significant impact on your writing education?I fully committed myself to writing because of pre-Katrina New Orleans. I graduated from Dillard University where Louisiana State Poet Laureate Mona Lisa Saloy had been my teacher and where 1998 American Book Award winner Brenda Marie Osbey had also matriculated. Osbey was giving readings at Dillard and throughout New Orleans when I began my education there.
When I graduated, Toi Derricotte, Gloria Wade Gayles, Yona Harvey, Terrance Hayes, and Major Jackson all happened to move to the city at the same time. Their presence shifted the environment and put me in direct contact with Black writers who were always willing to talk about literature. I also joined the NOMMO Literary Society led by Kalamu ya Salaam where I met some really amazing writers who were always honest with me about my work, including my friend Cassandra Lane.
All of the confluence of influence led to me taking poetry workshops with John Gery and Kay Murphy at the University of New Orleans where I would eventually earn my MFA. No other city at any other time could have offered me that.
Yes, I could have been surrounded by great writers in…I don’t know…New York City or somewhere. But that environment wouldn’t have made those writers feel they should make themselves available to me. New Orleans enhances people’s propensity for kindness.
Which non-literary piece of culture—film, tv show, painting, song—could you not imagine your life without?I saw Stevie Wonder perform again recently, and I realized that my love for his work has a great deal to do with how it gave me options for feeling and being I may not have otherwise recognized were available to me.Article continues after advertisementRemove Ads
The music and lyrics of his songs have a lot to do with how I think of myself as an artistic descendant and as a part of the various communities that nurture me and as a lifelong applicant to becoming an ancestor. I wouldn’t be as good at making love if I had never heard a Stevie Wonder song. I wouldn’t imagine as much of a mandate for formal inventiveness if I never heard a Stevie Wonder song. I think they helped me understand how to be more comfortable with my own rage and the fact that it’s often a perfectly understandable response.
Which book do you recommend most?I think it’s a good idea to know what the Bible actually says because—while yes, it may be inspiring to you—it’s also the book Americans often misuse to help usher in fascism. Better knowing the book could help resistance efforts. It’s also full of mythology and poetry and archetype, all of which writers use to strengthen our work.
What do you always want to talk about in interviews but never get to?I don’t think people need to hear from me about anything to want to read my work. Sappho does pretty well in the very long run without anyone asking her anything when we only have fragments of her poems. Interviews don’t give me an opportunity to talk about kindness, how I experience it through being it and receiving it. But me wanting to talk more about that in general doesn’t make this or any interview the absolute right time and place for it.
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Ling Ma
What’s the best or worst writing advice you’ve ever received?Best: “If you don’t know how to write it, be as simple and straightforward as possible.”
Worst: “Write about your home. You know, where you came from. Your homeland.”Article continues after advertisementRemove Ads
Who is the person, or what is the place or practice that had the most significant impact on your writing education?I immediately think about places. Chicago has inspired my writing, particularly the neighborhood cluster of Uptown, Edgewater, and Ravenswood. Walking around that area, I would have so many ideas. Another place is Topeka, Kansas—particularly the roads around there. I remember driving my Subaru Loyola during spring thunderstorms, another time for ideas.
Which non-literary piece of culture—film, tv show, painting, song—could you not imagine your life without?Maybe The X-Files, which I first watched when I was 8 or 9 years old.
Which book do you recommend most?I think everyone should read You Are Not a Gadget by Jaron Lanier.
What do you always want to talk about in interviews but never get to?Lately, I have been thinking about the nature of awards and fellowships, having been a beneficiary of a few of these. Being selected has changed my life and allowed me some options—I have been able to walk away from a job, spend time pursuing other projects. It has given me some measure of freedom and dignity. This past year, while I was unemployed, a good portion of my award and fellowship funds have gone to the monthly maintenance of living—health insurance fees, childcare costs, housing, etc.
But when a young writer approaches me and seeks advice for “how to make it work” (i.e. how to keep writing while also making a living), I don’t know what to say. My answer can’t be, “Just get lucky! Win a bunch of awards and fellowships. Get struck by lightning!” One indicator of a free society is its diverse flowering of writers, artists, musicians. This can’t happen when most everyone is too busy struggling to make a basic living, getting gouged by companies that feed off creative work of others (i.e. Spotify), or overpaying for essential services and necessities that should be free or very cheap. Such as healthcare, prescription meds, housing, etc.Article continues after advertisementRemove Ads
I don’t want to be touted as an example of a writer who “makes it work” based on the strength of their talent, or whatever story about merit that we tell ourselves in a capitalist society. Because my life has, for the past few years, been powered by a mystifying streak of luck. Without this, I probably would not be making it work. I want to confirm that the system, on its own, is *not* good enough. You are not wrong, it is not your fault, and the fact that you struggle is not because you are not good enough, or that you haven’t hustled hard enough. Corporations are running the show, and democracy is turning into oligarchy.
But I still want to say, Keep writing anyway. Keep making art. Keep creating music. Not as a direct act of political resistance, necessarily. But as a way of prioritizing yourself, your inner life. As a way of accessing realities beyond this society controlled by unimaginative powers. I still think it matters.
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Jason Reynolds
What’s the best or worst writing advice you’ve ever received?The best and worst advice is the same advice, which is to write five pages a day and that if you write five a day, that will yield three books or novels a year. And though it was good in terms of teaching me discipline and practice and habit, it was bad advice by setting me up for workaholism or productivity guilt.
Who is the person, or what is the place or practice that had the most significant impact on your writing education?The place and practice that had the most significant impact on my writing education are all the grimy clubs on U Street in Northwest Washington, DC, where as a teenager, I met the first Black writers I’d come to know and admire.
Which non-literary piece of culture—film, tv show, painting, song—could you not imagine your life without?I couldn’t imagine my life without Stevie Wonder’s Songs in the Key of Life.
Which book do you recommend most?I recommend Jesymn Ward’s Salvage the Bones the most.
What do you always want to talk about in interviews but never get to?I always want to talk about, and never get to, the psychological state of writing. Sometimes it’s a toll and sometimes it’s an intoxication, but it’s always a psychological shift… a state… when writing.
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Juan Felipe Herrera
What’s the best or worst writing advice you’ve ever received?My mother was born in 1904 in Mexico City. Hard times during the Mexican Revolution, and she migrated to the USA. “I want you to be Free,” she said.
When I write, I do not restrict myself to any literary or poetic fad, style, fancy dictum—I listen.
What I feel, see and discover in books I suddenly find is most beneficial—Desnos, Rodnoti, Stern, Bombal, Paz. Also, at times when I have attended a reading, there is a young poet that cuts loose and moves me.
Who is the person, or what is the place or practice that had the most significant impact on your writing education?In high school, I was particularly captured by Surrealists, European writers & painters, Zen poets, and playwrights. Friends through the years, from 1966 to 1979—Alurista, Francisco X. Alarcón and Victor Martinez—were key to my writing. They were well versed in philosophy and Latin American literature. Activists like Mandela and Rigoberta Menchú. All this was very striking to me.
At the Writers Workshop, University of Iowa, I learned so much from Marvin Bell, Gerald Stern and Jory Grayham. Most direct and powerful was Marvin’s focus on Caesura and Enjambment. And Stern’s Plain talk and conversational and emotionally intense poetry.
At large, through their experience and work, the Polish poets were extremely influential. Marvin’s and Gerald’s writing are deeply influential to this day.
Let me add, Nazim Hikment, Oxctavio Paz, Phil Levine, Ethridge Knight, Lorna Dee Cervantes and Joy Harjo.
Which non-literary piece of culture—film, tv show, painting, song—could you not imagine your life without?Visual art is one genre that has nurtured and lifted me to incredible heights—the Italian Renaissance, the Surrealists of the 20s, the Mexican Muralists including Frida Kahlo, the Expressionists, Andy Warhol, the Installation artists of the 60s, and the sculptors. As well as the ancestral cultures of the Toltecs, Aztecs and Mayas. My imagination has lived in these fields and with these amazing geniuses.
I am also influenced by Movement poetry—African American, Chicano, Chinese and Latin American. I am a total fan of Asian thinkers and philosophers.
Which book do you recommend most?Yellow Rain, by Mai Der Vang.
What do you always want to talk about in interviews but never get to?How we need to save the world with compassion and kindness in our poems, arts, lives and social institutions in a myriad of ways.

A scientist’s final quest is to find new schizophrenia drugs

Scolnick, 84 years old, has spent most of the past two decades working to understand and find better ways to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, mental illnesses suffered by tens of millions of people, including his son.

“I know I can crack it,” said Scolnick, a noted drug developer who spent his career plumbing the building blocks of DNA for new treatments.

Long before his latest quest, Scolnick spent 22 years at Merck, mostly as head of the drug giant’s laboratory research. He led development of more than two dozen medicines, including the first approved statin to lower cholesterol, an osteoporosis treatment and an anti-HIV therapy.

He also was the company’s chief scientist during the development and rollout of Merck’s pain reliever Vioxx in 1999. Researchers in a published study later estimated that tens of thousands of people died from heart attacks after taking the drug before Merck pulled it off the market in 2004. The company paid $4.85 billion to settle lawsuits with people who claimed they were injured by the drug.

Scolnick stepped down as head of Merck’s research lab in 2002. He told friends he wanted to spend the rest of his working life searching for better psychiatric treatment. Scolnick believed advances in genetic technologies would lead to the unraveling of even conditions as complex as schizophrenia, which brings hallucinations and delusions, and bipolar disorder, which causes extreme mood swings.

Discoveries in the years since show he was on the right track.

In 2021, Scolnick learned that a group of scientists analyzing DNA from thousands of people with schizophrenia had found mutations in 10 genes that substantially increased the risk of developing the illness. They estimated that a mutation on a single gene, called Setd1a, raised the risk 20-fold.

“It got my blood boiling,” Scolnick said. He began pursuing an emerging class of treatments called LSD1 inhibitors, hoping to develop a new drug. Scolnick enlisted Dr. Hugh Young Rienhoff Jr., who recently developed an LSD1 inhibitor to treat blood disorders.

Scolnick hopes the work will lead to the first approved drug to help with cognitive symptoms—such as trouble paying attention and making plans—for people with schizophrenia. Cognitive decline from disease robs people of the ability to hold jobs and manage daily lives.

Rienhoff anticipates testing a new drug for safety as early as next year, first in animals. He said he saw Scolnick’s passion about fielding a breakthrough treatment but didn’t fully understand why until Scolnick shared about his son’s lifelong struggles with mental illness.

Jason Scolnick, 54, said his doctor has been regularly fine-tuning his medications for bipolar disorder over the years to minimize their debilitating side effects. Using the drugs currently prescribed for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder is like undergoing chemotherapy, he said. “There’s no guarantee it will work and it makes you feel terrible, but the cancer will feel worse or kill you.”

There remains a long road ahead for any new medicine. It takes more than a decade, on average, to get a drug from the research lab through government approvals to patients.

Ed Scolnick tries to make the most of his days. In May, he walked stiffly to the podium at a meeting of scientists to report on how he landed on LSD1 inhibitors as an avenue for treatment of schizophrenia.

Phillip Sharp, a Nobel Prize-winning drug developer and professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was in the audience. Sharp, who has known Scolnick for years, said he was moved that his friend devoted his time and attention to a drug he likely won’t see to fruition.

Rienhoff said Scolnick has asked him to finish the work if he is no longer around.

“This is going to be my last hurrah,” Scolnick said.

Blind luckMore than 60 years ago, doctors by chance stumbled upon drugs that evolved into treatments for mental illness. Medicines relieved symptoms long before researchers knew how mental illness worked. Lithium, for instance, stabilized moods for people with bipolar disorder, and clozapine tamped down hallucinations and delusions from schizophrenia.

Scientists have since learned that psychiatric disorders can result from interactions among hundreds of genes, in still-unsolved combinations believed to vary by individuals and within families. To find the gene mutations that carry a higher risk, researchers would have to first compare the DNA of people with mental illness to those without the disease.

After leaving Merck, Scolnick was hired in 2004 by the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard to lead research on psychiatric disorders. He fostered ties with Ted Stanley, a memorabilia entrepreneur whose son also suffered with mental illness. In 2007, Stanley gave $100 million to launch the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad, headed by Scolnick for five years.

In the summer of 2017, the Broad organized an international consortium to harness resources and the latest gene technology that ended up analyzing DNA from more than 24,000 people with schizophrenia and more than 97,000 people without. Sifting for useful clues in reams of data would take years more.

Scolnick retired as chief scientist at the Stanley Center in 2020 for health reasons. He played competitive bridge and awoke early to swim laps. Scolnick visited the Broad for scientific meetings and gave talks. He also spoke regularly with one of the chief investigators of the DNA analysis.

In 2021, the investigator told Scolnick about the latest results: the Setd1a gene mutation substantially raised the risk of people developing schizophrenia.

Scolnick, inspired by the finding, dug into research papers and learned that Takeda Pharmaceutical had developed and tested an LSD1 inhibitor for Kabuki syndrome, a genetic disorder that can cause intellectual disabilities in children. During a visit to Takeda’s lab in Cambridge, Mass., and in follow-up video calls, the company shared data with Scolnick that showed improved cognition in mice given the drug.

Takeda said it dropped the project after concluding it wasn’t “a viable therapeutic option.” Yet the company’s findings convinced Scolnick that a specialized enzyme inhibitor might improve cognitive symptoms without severe side effects.

Developing that kind of drug was too big a job for one man alone, Scolnick said, and too expensive. Such a project might cost hundreds of millions of dollars.

Then chance intervened.

In January 2023, Scolnick heard a talk by Rienhoff organized by Blackstone, the New York-based investment firm. Scolnick, a senior adviser at Blackstone Life Sciences, wanted to know more about the LSD1 inhibitor Rienhoff developed to treat blood disorders. That same month, Merck completed a $1.4 billion acquisition of Rienhoff’s company, Imago BioSciences.

Scolnick and Rienhoff had sat together at a Blackstone dinner years earlier. During the meal, Scolnick shared stories with his table companions about Merck’s development of Crixivan, the anti-HIV drug. “I was hearing a piece of history,” Rienhoff said, “not just HIV history.”

Scolnick became emotional describing how the drug developers, facing various obstacles, wrestled with whether or not to keep going. He pushed for the study to continue, given the urgency. At the time, AIDS was killing tens of thousands of people a year in the U.S.

“I said to Ed, ‘You are thinking like a doctor not a scientist,’” Rienhoff said. “That was the beginning of our relationship.”

After Rienhoff’s presentation last year, Scolnick learned that Rienhoff was an expert in the enzyme he believed key to a breakthrough drug. In conversations, Scolnick got Rienhoff thinking about using LSD1 inhibitors for schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric illnesses.

When Scolnick raised the idea of developing a new drug, Rienhoff told him he could make one. Rienhoff founded Aluco BioSciences this year as a first step. To make the leap from hematology, his expertise, to neuropsychiatry, Rienhoff said he has been meeting clinicians and neuroscientists, steeping himself in various theories on the causes of schizophrenia and seeking potential collaborators.

Rienhoff has a team of chemists making and testing compounds at labs in the U.S. and abroad.

“I am optimistic something will come of this,” Rienhoff said. “I can do it, but I wouldn’t have done it if not for Ed. I am, really, doing this in a way for Ed.”

‘Before I die’Jason Scolnick lives in a light-filled condominium in Watertown, Mass., about a 25-minute drive from his parents. Guitars lean against a wall, and a landscape photo shot by his mother hangs on another. He sometimes watches football games on the big-screen TV with his father. His life now contrasts with years of struggle.

Jason graduated from Harvard University in 1992 and worked as a clerk in the economics department of a biotech firm. Before taking the job, he began to feel paranoid. At work, he couldn’t look colleagues in the eye. Doctors suspected bipolar disorder and prescribed him medications. They left him so tired, he had trouble keeping awake while driving. He missed work, then quit and moved in with his parents in Philadelphia.

Jason’s doctors finally found a drug regimen he could tolerate after two years of trying.

At age 25, Jason returned to Boston to study guitar at Berklee College of Music but dropped out after less than a year. During those months, he said, his paranoia had returned, and he abused alcohol. One night in 1995, Jason said, he took pills, intending to end his life. He woke up hallucinating and called a friend who dialed 911 for an ambulance.

Jason returned to live with his parents in 1996, the same year the Food and Drug Administration approved Merck’s anti-HIV drug that his father had helped develop. He tried various medicines over the years, including one drug that landed him in the hospital.

“They call antipsychotics major tranquilizers for good reason,” Jason said. “They clamp down on your head and it’s up to you to suck down large amounts of coffee to deal with how they make you feel. Not just tired, but also cognitively impaired.”

The lack of effective treatments saddened and frustrated his father, who built a career developing drugs for once-intractable conditions.

Jason, who has been sober for more than a decade, is now in his second year of a master’s program at Lesley University, studying to become a clinical mental-health counselor and music therapist. He credits his psychiatrist for continuing to help calibrate his drugs and therapy.

“There’s nobody I know who can just take medicine and be fine,” Jason said.

His father agreed, to a point.

“It won’t just take some magical drug to fix what people with really severe mental illness have,” Ed Scolnick said.

But as a parent and scientist, he feels certain new treatments will improve lives for many people. “There’s a need for better drugs,” he said, believing he is on the right path. Others also are on the hunt.

Biotech company Oryzon Genomics in Spain is developing LSD1 inhibitors for cancer and other conditions. Columbia University researchers tried Oryzon’s drug in mice and found it reversed cognitive impairments caused by the Setd1a genetic mutation connected to schizophrenia. Oryzon is running a small trial in Spain of the LSD1 inhibitor in patients with schizophrenia.

Dr. Joseph Gogos, who led the Columbia research, said it was possible such treatments would be approved for people.

Scolnick is more certain—of both a revolutionary new treatment and his living to witness it.

“Before I die, we will see new medicines, new diagnostics, better outcomes for patients burdened by schizophrenia or bipolar illness,” he said. “I will not be happy to die. But I will die happy that my life helped.”

Write to Amy Dockser Marcus at [email protected]

A scientist’s final quest is to find new schizophrenia drugs

Scolnick, 84 years old, has spent most of the past two decades working to understand and find better ways to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, mental illnesses suffered by tens of millions of people, including his son.

“I know I can crack it,” said Scolnick, a noted drug developer who spent his career plumbing the building blocks of DNA for new treatments.

Long before his latest quest, Scolnick spent 22 years at Merck, mostly as head of the drug giant’s laboratory research. He led development of more than two dozen medicines, including the first approved statin to lower cholesterol, an osteoporosis treatment and an anti-HIV therapy.

He also was the company’s chief scientist during the development and rollout of Merck’s pain reliever Vioxx in 1999. Researchers in a published study later estimated that tens of thousands of people died from heart attacks after taking the drug before Merck pulled it off the market in 2004. The company paid $4.85 billion to settle lawsuits with people who claimed they were injured by the drug.

Scolnick stepped down as head of Merck’s research lab in 2002. He told friends he wanted to spend the rest of his working life searching for better psychiatric treatment. Scolnick believed advances in genetic technologies would lead to the unraveling of even conditions as complex as schizophrenia, which brings hallucinations and delusions, and bipolar disorder, which causes extreme mood swings.

Discoveries in the years since show he was on the right track.

In 2021, Scolnick learned that a group of scientists analyzing DNA from thousands of people with schizophrenia had found mutations in 10 genes that substantially increased the risk of developing the illness. They estimated that a mutation on a single gene, called Setd1a, raised the risk 20-fold.

“It got my blood boiling,” Scolnick said. He began pursuing an emerging class of treatments called LSD1 inhibitors, hoping to develop a new drug. Scolnick enlisted Dr. Hugh Young Rienhoff Jr., who recently developed an LSD1 inhibitor to treat blood disorders.

Scolnick hopes the work will lead to the first approved drug to help with cognitive symptoms—such as trouble paying attention and making plans—for people with schizophrenia. Cognitive decline from disease robs people of the ability to hold jobs and manage daily lives.

Rienhoff anticipates testing a new drug for safety as early as next year, first in animals. He said he saw Scolnick’s passion about fielding a breakthrough treatment but didn’t fully understand why until Scolnick shared about his son’s lifelong struggles with mental illness.

Jason Scolnick, 54, said his doctor has been regularly fine-tuning his medications for bipolar disorder over the years to minimize their debilitating side effects. Using the drugs currently prescribed for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder is like undergoing chemotherapy, he said. “There’s no guarantee it will work and it makes you feel terrible, but the cancer will feel worse or kill you.”

There remains a long road ahead for any new medicine. It takes more than a decade, on average, to get a drug from the research lab through government approvals to patients.

Ed Scolnick tries to make the most of his days. In May, he walked stiffly to the podium at a meeting of scientists to report on how he landed on LSD1 inhibitors as an avenue for treatment of schizophrenia.

Phillip Sharp, a Nobel Prize-winning drug developer and professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was in the audience. Sharp, who has known Scolnick for years, said he was moved that his friend devoted his time and attention to a drug he likely won’t see to fruition.

Rienhoff said Scolnick has asked him to finish the work if he is no longer around.

“This is going to be my last hurrah,” Scolnick said.

Blind luckMore than 60 years ago, doctors by chance stumbled upon drugs that evolved into treatments for mental illness. Medicines relieved symptoms long before researchers knew how mental illness worked. Lithium, for instance, stabilized moods for people with bipolar disorder, and clozapine tamped down hallucinations and delusions from schizophrenia.

Scientists have since learned that psychiatric disorders can result from interactions among hundreds of genes, in still-unsolved combinations believed to vary by individuals and within families. To find the gene mutations that carry a higher risk, researchers would have to first compare the DNA of people with mental illness to those without the disease.

After leaving Merck, Scolnick was hired in 2004 by the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard to lead research on psychiatric disorders. He fostered ties with Ted Stanley, a memorabilia entrepreneur whose son also suffered with mental illness. In 2007, Stanley gave $100 million to launch the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad, headed by Scolnick for five years.

In the summer of 2017, the Broad organized an international consortium to harness resources and the latest gene technology that ended up analyzing DNA from more than 24,000 people with schizophrenia and more than 97,000 people without. Sifting for useful clues in reams of data would take years more.

Scolnick retired as chief scientist at the Stanley Center in 2020 for health reasons. He played competitive bridge and awoke early to swim laps. Scolnick visited the Broad for scientific meetings and gave talks. He also spoke regularly with one of the chief investigators of the DNA analysis.

In 2021, the investigator told Scolnick about the latest results: the Setd1a gene mutation substantially raised the risk of people developing schizophrenia.

Scolnick, inspired by the finding, dug into research papers and learned that Takeda Pharmaceutical had developed and tested an LSD1 inhibitor for Kabuki syndrome, a genetic disorder that can cause intellectual disabilities in children. During a visit to Takeda’s lab in Cambridge, Mass., and in follow-up video calls, the company shared data with Scolnick that showed improved cognition in mice given the drug.

Takeda said it dropped the project after concluding it wasn’t “a viable therapeutic option.” Yet the company’s findings convinced Scolnick that a specialized enzyme inhibitor might improve cognitive symptoms without severe side effects.

Developing that kind of drug was too big a job for one man alone, Scolnick said, and too expensive. Such a project might cost hundreds of millions of dollars.

Then chance intervened.

In January 2023, Scolnick heard a talk by Rienhoff organized by Blackstone, the New York-based investment firm. Scolnick, a senior adviser at Blackstone Life Sciences, wanted to know more about the LSD1 inhibitor Rienhoff developed to treat blood disorders. That same month, Merck completed a $1.4 billion acquisition of Rienhoff’s company, Imago BioSciences.

Scolnick and Rienhoff had sat together at a Blackstone dinner years earlier. During the meal, Scolnick shared stories with his table companions about Merck’s development of Crixivan, the anti-HIV drug. “I was hearing a piece of history,” Rienhoff said, “not just HIV history.”

Scolnick became emotional describing how the drug developers, facing various obstacles, wrestled with whether or not to keep going. He pushed for the study to continue, given the urgency. At the time, AIDS was killing tens of thousands of people a year in the U.S.

“I said to Ed, ‘You are thinking like a doctor not a scientist,’” Rienhoff said. “That was the beginning of our relationship.”

After Rienhoff’s presentation last year, Scolnick learned that Rienhoff was an expert in the enzyme he believed key to a breakthrough drug. In conversations, Scolnick got Rienhoff thinking about using LSD1 inhibitors for schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric illnesses.

When Scolnick raised the idea of developing a new drug, Rienhoff told him he could make one. Rienhoff founded Aluco BioSciences this year as a first step. To make the leap from hematology, his expertise, to neuropsychiatry, Rienhoff said he has been meeting clinicians and neuroscientists, steeping himself in various theories on the causes of schizophrenia and seeking potential collaborators.

Rienhoff has a team of chemists making and testing compounds at labs in the U.S. and abroad.

“I am optimistic something will come of this,” Rienhoff said. “I can do it, but I wouldn’t have done it if not for Ed. I am, really, doing this in a way for Ed.”

‘Before I die’Jason Scolnick lives in a light-filled condominium in Watertown, Mass., about a 25-minute drive from his parents. Guitars lean against a wall, and a landscape photo shot by his mother hangs on another. He sometimes watches football games on the big-screen TV with his father. His life now contrasts with years of struggle.

Jason graduated from Harvard University in 1992 and worked as a clerk in the economics department of a biotech firm. Before taking the job, he began to feel paranoid. At work, he couldn’t look colleagues in the eye. Doctors suspected bipolar disorder and prescribed him medications. They left him so tired, he had trouble keeping awake while driving. He missed work, then quit and moved in with his parents in Philadelphia.

Jason’s doctors finally found a drug regimen he could tolerate after two years of trying.

At age 25, Jason returned to Boston to study guitar at Berklee College of Music but dropped out after less than a year. During those months, he said, his paranoia had returned, and he abused alcohol. One night in 1995, Jason said, he took pills, intending to end his life. He woke up hallucinating and called a friend who dialed 911 for an ambulance.

Jason returned to live with his parents in 1996, the same year the Food and Drug Administration approved Merck’s anti-HIV drug that his father had helped develop. He tried various medicines over the years, including one drug that landed him in the hospital.

“They call antipsychotics major tranquilizers for good reason,” Jason said. “They clamp down on your head and it’s up to you to suck down large amounts of coffee to deal with how they make you feel. Not just tired, but also cognitively impaired.”

The lack of effective treatments saddened and frustrated his father, who built a career developing drugs for once-intractable conditions.

Jason, who has been sober for more than a decade, is now in his second year of a master’s program at Lesley University, studying to become a clinical mental-health counselor and music therapist. He credits his psychiatrist for continuing to help calibrate his drugs and therapy.

“There’s nobody I know who can just take medicine and be fine,” Jason said.

His father agreed, to a point.

“It won’t just take some magical drug to fix what people with really severe mental illness have,” Ed Scolnick said.

But as a parent and scientist, he feels certain new treatments will improve lives for many people. “There’s a need for better drugs,” he said, believing he is on the right path. Others also are on the hunt.

Biotech company Oryzon Genomics in Spain is developing LSD1 inhibitors for cancer and other conditions. Columbia University researchers tried Oryzon’s drug in mice and found it reversed cognitive impairments caused by the Setd1a genetic mutation connected to schizophrenia. Oryzon is running a small trial in Spain of the LSD1 inhibitor in patients with schizophrenia.

Dr. Joseph Gogos, who led the Columbia research, said it was possible such treatments would be approved for people.

Scolnick is more certain—of both a revolutionary new treatment and his living to witness it.

“Before I die, we will see new medicines, new diagnostics, better outcomes for patients burdened by schizophrenia or bipolar illness,” he said. “I will not be happy to die. But I will die happy that my life helped.”

Write to Amy Dockser Marcus at [email protected]