George Washington and Duquesne meet for conference showdown

Duquesne Dukes (10-5, 1-3 A-10) at George Washington Revolutionaries (8-7, 1-3 A-10)
Washington; Saturday, 12 p.m. EST
BOTTOM LINE: Makayla Andrews and George Washington host Megan McConnell and Duquesne in A-10 play.
The Revolutionaries have gone 5-3 at home. George Washington is 2-0 when it has fewer turnovers than its opponents and averages 17.6 turnovers per game.
The Dukes are 1-3 in conference matchups. Duquesne ranks seventh in the A-10 shooting 32.8% from 3-point range.
George Washington scores 62.0 points per game, 5.0 fewer points than the 67.0 Duquesne allows. Duquesne averages 9.8 made 3-pointers per game this season, 3.3 more made shots on average than the 6.5 per game George Washington allows.
The Revolutionaries and Dukes face off Saturday for the first time in A-10 play this season.
TOP PERFORMERS: Andrews is shooting 40.3% and averaging 12.1 points for the Revolutionaries.
McConell is scoring 20.2 points per game and averaging 7.7 rebounds for the Dukes.
LAST 10 GAMES: Revolutionaries: 5-5, averaging 58.8 points, 35.9 rebounds, 9.9 assists, 6.3 steals and 3.8 blocks per game while shooting 39.5% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 61.6 points per game.
Dukes: 7-3, averaging 74.0 points, 32.5 rebounds, 13.5 assists, 11.9 steals and 3.8 blocks per game while shooting 42.9% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 64.0 points.
___
The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Copyright
© 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.

TSA Expands Biometric Technology Across U.S. Airports Amid Privacy Concerns

The TSA is implementing biometric technology, including facial recognition, across U.S. airports, prompting debates over privacy, transparency, and government surveillance.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is expanding its deployment of biometric technology, including facial recognition systems, at airports across the United States. The initiative, which the agency touts as a way to improve efficiency and enhance security, has sparked significant privacy concerns among lawmakers and civil rights advocates. Critics are questioning the potential for government overreach and the long-term implications for personal freedoms.
According to the TSA, its Credential Authentication Technology (CAT-2) scanners, now installed at nearly 84 airports nationwide, aim to streamline the passenger identification process. These systems compare a traveler’s facial image with their ID or passport. With plans to expand the program to over 400 airports, the agency has made biometrics a central focus of its modernization efforts. However, privacy advocates warn that the mass collection of biometric data raises critical questions about transparency and data protection. Additional details about the TSA’s expansion can be found here.
Critics argue that while the TSA asserts that facial recognition photos are deleted after use, the scale of the program makes it vulnerable to misuse. A bipartisan group of 12 senators recently called for an investigation into the agency’s biometric practices, citing the potential creation of a massive surveillance database. Lawmakers also highlighted the absence of comprehensive congressional oversight, as detailed here.
Although the TSA maintains that participation in the program is voluntary, reports indicate that opting out is often unclear or inconsistently enforced. Instances of passengers facing resistance or confusion from Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) have further eroded public trust in the agency’s handling of biometric data. More information on these reports can be found here.
Globally, the use of biometric technology in travel is gaining traction. India’s Digi Yatra program, which has garnered over nine million active users, stores biometric data on users’ mobile devices rather than in centralized databases, offering a potential model for balancing privacy and efficiency. However, the U.S. has opted for a centralized approach, raising additional privacy concerns. Critics note that the TSA’s technology has a three percent error rate, which could create discrepancies for tens of thousands of travelers annually.
To address these concerns, the Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2023 was introduced to limit the TSA’s authority to use facial recognition for passenger screening and mandate the deletion of collected data. While the bill has yet to pass, it underscores growing congressional unease over the unchecked expansion of biometric systems.
As the TSA continues to implement biometric technology, the public must grapple with the trade-offs between convenience, security, and privacy. The ongoing debate highlights the importance of establishing clear safeguards to prevent misuse while ensuring individual freedoms are not compromised. Until these issues are resolved, the TSA’s biometric expansion will remain a contentious topic.

yourNEWS.com is a premier news dissemination platform operating at local, state, and national levels. Our unwavering commitment lies in the restoration of journalistic integrity. We envision news delivery in its purest form: untainted by bias and firmly grounded in truth. Embracing transparency, we refrain from censorship. By circumventing the gatekeepers of misinformation and government narratives, we empower ‘the people’ with the rightful control over the press. yourNEWS is on the cusp of reshaping the media landscape, cultivating the largest news platform globally. We are not just forecasting change—we’re creating it. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of yourNEWS. (Note: Articles may not be original content. Reference byline for original source.)

Eastern Washington puts home win streak on the line against Sacramento State

#inform-video-player-1 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

#inform-video-player-2 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

Sacramento State Hornets (8-7, 1-1 Big Sky) at Eastern Washington Eagles (5-10, 1-2 Big Sky)Cheney, Washington; Saturday, 5 p.m. ESTBOTTOM LINE: Eastern Washington will try to keep its three-game home win streak intact when the Eagles face Sacramento State.
The Eagles have gone 5-2 in home games. Eastern Washington is 4-3 when it has fewer turnovers than its opponents and averages 13.9 turnovers per game.The Hornets are 1-1 against Big Sky opponents. Sacramento State has a 1-1 record in games decided by 3 points or fewer.Eastern Washington scores 64.8 points per game, 4.2 more points than the 60.6 Sacramento State gives up. Sacramento State has shot at a 42.4% rate from the field this season, 2.4 percentage points higher than the 40.0% shooting opponents of Eastern Washington have averaged.The Eagles and Hornets face off Saturday for the first time in Big Sky play this season.

I’ve been wearing an Oura Ring to track my fitness for 4 years. Here are the pros and cons of the device loved by celebs and business execs.

Health

I’ve been wearing an Oura Ring to track my fitness for 4 years. Here are the pros and cons of the device loved by celebs and business execs.

Rachel Hosie

2025-01-11T08:33:01Z

Share icon
An curved arrow pointing right.

Share

Facebook

Email

X

LinkedIn

Copy Link

lighning bolt icon
An icon in the shape of a lightning bolt.

Impact Link

Save Article Icon
A bookmark

Save

Read in app

Angle down icon
An icon in the shape of an angle pointing down.

My Oura Ring tracks my movement and rest across the day, and it is subtle enough to wear on any occasion.

Rachel Hosie

The Oura Ring is a fitness tracker popular among athletes, business execs, and celebrities.Fitness reporter Rachel Hosie has used one for four years and was originally attracted by its look.Oura “Rings provide sleep data, step counts, and menstrual cycle tracking.When I first learned about a new fitness-tracking smart ring four years ago, it wasn’t the promise of high-tech features that most piqued my interest, it was the look.

Living Well with SoHum Health: How to Keep Your Resolutions, the Brain Science of Habit

SoHum Health aims to minimize harm and maximize vitality by providing an informative column to the community. Only about 25% of us keep our New Year’s resolutions for the first 30 days of the year, and after that fewer than 10% of us actually achieve the goal we strive for once Auld Lang Syne has become a champagne-shrouded memory for another year. Rather than falling into the negative trap of frustration and disappointment, arguably a bad habit itself, a look at the brain science of habit may help us do better at breaking a negative pattern or embarking on a positive new path.
Habits are formed through the repetition of actions or thoughts which eventually get filed in a region of the brain called the basal ganglia, an area deep in the brain with many responsibilities including the control of voluntary movements but also associated with addiction when not functioning properly. Once the frontal lobes (which govern executive function in the brain) have finished the active learning phase of a movement, action, thought, etc. the basal ganglia takes over and in a seemingly automatic way, facilitates the deed from that point forward.
When you first learn to ride a bicycle, play a scale on the piano, or recite the multiplication tables, your brain uses a lot of energy to perform the task. Because the brain is always looking for ways to conserve energy, after some 30-60 repetitions, or more depending on the complexity of the habit, the basal ganglia takes over so that the frontal brain can take up other demanding and complex tasks such as putting together your child’s new Lego set.
Once this automatic pattern is in place, it can be quite difficult to change, as those who give up on their resolutions know all too well. While forming a new habit takes as little as 30-60 reps, breaking an unwanted habit can be much more difficult, taking somewhere between 18 and 250 days depending on how long you’ve had the habit and how ingrained in everyday life it may be. Research has shown that it is easier to break a physical habit than a thought habit, such as that automatic frustration at not keeping your resolutions.
For forming a new, positive habit, or discarding an old, negative one, it’s helpful to know the psychology of habit, which has three phases: cue, routine, and reward.
A cue is a signal or trigger that your brain has developed a habitual response to, such as boredom causing you to feel hungry. It can be an internal emotion such as stress causing you to bite your nails. It’s similar to the reason we salivate when we smell dinner cooking or get sleepy when politicians start talking.
Then comes the routine, the action or thought habitually performed in response to the cue. You reach for an unneeded snack when bored, you bite your nails when stressed. Even though the frontal brain “knows” these behaviors are not healthy or reasonable, you are trapped by habit dictated by the basal ganglia.
Then the reward: your “hunger” is satisfied, your stress is diminished, or maybe at least derailed. The reward, whatever it is, completes the habit cycle.
The key to forming a new habit is to replace the routine triggered by the cue, reaping a new and preferably even more valuable reward. Identifying the cue itself can be tricky because the whole situation has become so automatic that you might miss the trigger. When you find yourself biting your nails, you might have to backtrack to realize what caused your stress in the first place. With patience and a little discipline, you begin to recognize your patterns.
Once you can identify the cue, being consistent about the replacement behavior you choose is essential, but not easy. Your rational mind gets why it’s not healthy to eat out of boredom, but your basal ganglia not so much; it’s on auto-pilot. To escape the cycle, it’s more effective to replace the frustration with a new choice, perhaps to have a drink of water or a cup of your favorite tea. Instead of reaching for a bag of chips or biting your nails, go outside and take five deep breaths, text a loving message to your sweetie, or listen to a favorite piece of music. Whatever replacement you choose, the reward needs to be as good as or even better than the reward you got for the negative habit.
In forging a new positive habit, the practice is essentially the same, except instead of replacement, you’re starting from scratch. On the surface, this might seem easier, but I refer you back to those resolutions you probably didn’t keep. If you resolved to walk 30 minutes a day and begged off the first time it was raining at walk-time, you interrupted the repetition needed to relieve the frontal brain of its hard work, and either delayed or thwarted success.
Motivation can play a big role in working with habit, as research shows that a high level of motivation improves your chances of changing your habit. Statistics say that pregnant women are much more successful at quitting cigarettes than the average smoker. Because the brain is wired to perceive and avoid immediate threat to life and limb, fear of harm can be your friend. However, effective as fear may be, it’s not applicable to many situations. That’s where reliance on the science of the brain’s plasticity can provide the foundation of your success. Re-training your neurons to take the roads less traveled takes persistence but frees you of self-judgment.
Support from friends or others dealing with similar patterns can be very helpful and provide an accountability loop that reinforces consistency. Going to meetings or just interacting with others in the same boat buoys your resolve.
Changing the environment that enables negative habits can also be helpful. Remove unhealthy snacks from your cupboard. Paint your nails. In forging new habits, have good rain gear at the ready so you are more likely to take that walk.
When you have a backslide, don’t beat yourself up with a lot of negative internal babble. Know instead that it’s brain science that will get you where you want to be. Channel your inner child and remember how badly you once wanted to ride a two-wheeler and how much freedom that represented. The exact same brain science that gave you balance on that bike can get you to your resolution goals. And reach out to a friend to support their efforts. We’re all in this together.

Huijbens and Gonzaga host Washington State

Gonzaga Bulldogs (9-8, 4-2 WCC) at Washington State Cougars (10-7, 5-1 WCC)Pullman, Washington; Saturday, 3 p.m. ESTBOTTOM LINE: Gonzaga visits Washington State after Maud Huijbens scored 23 points in Gonzaga’s 82-56 win against the Santa Clara Broncos.The Cougars have gone 5-2 in home games. Washington State ranks sixth in the WCC in team defense, allowing 65.5 points while holding opponents to 39.0% shooting.The Bulldogs are 4-2 in WCC play. Gonzaga ranks second in the WCC with 34.9 rebounds per game led by Yvonne Ejim averaging 8.3.Washington State is shooting 41.5% from the field this season, 0.1 percentage points higher than the 41.4% Gonzaga allows to opponents. Gonzaga averages 7.2 made 3-pointers per game this season, 1.1 more made shots on average than the 6.1 per game Washington State gives up.The matchup Saturday is the first meeting of the season between the two teams in conference play.TOP PERFORMERS: Tara Wallack is averaging 13.1 points, 7.4 rebounds and 1.9 blocks for the Cougars.Allie Turner averages 2.8 made 3-pointers per game for the Bulldogs, scoring 12.8 points while shooting 42.0% from beyond the arc.LAST 10 GAMES: Cougars: 6-4, averaging 67.1 points, 31.9 rebounds, 14.7 assists, 6.6 steals and 6.7 blocks per game while shooting 43.3% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 61.5 points per game.Bulldogs: 5-5, averaging 67.8 points, 35.7 rebounds, 17.6 assists, 7.3 steals and 2.8 blocks per game while shooting 44.1% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 67.0 points.The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Goldin leads No. 24 Michigan against Washington

Washington Huskies (10-6, 1-4 Big Ten) at Michigan Wolverines (12-3, 4-0 Big Ten)Ann Arbor, Michigan; Sunday, 2 p.m. ESTBOTTOM LINE: No. 24 Michigan hosts Washington after Vladislav Goldin scored 36 points in Michigan’s 94-75 win over the UCLA Bruins.The Wolverines have gone 7-0 in home games. Michigan is 10-0 in games decided by 10 or more points.The Huskies are 1-4 in Big Ten play. Washington scores 73.1 points while outscoring opponents by 2.5 points per game.Michigan makes 51.9% of its shots from the field this season, which is 7.7 percentage points higher than Washington has allowed to its opponents (44.2%). Washington averages 6.5 made 3-pointers per game this season, 0.1 fewer makes per game than Michigan gives up.The Wolverines and Huskies face off Sunday for the first time in Big Ten play this season.TOP PERFORMERS: Tre Donaldson averages 2.1 made 3-pointers per game for the Wolverines, scoring 13.1 points while shooting 46.3% from beyond the arc.DJ Davis averages 1.7 made 3-pointers per game for the Huskies, scoring 8.7 points while shooting 33.8% from beyond the arc.LAST 10 GAMES: Wolverines: 8-2, averaging 85.8 points, 36.8 rebounds, 18.0 assists, 6.2 steals and 4.7 blocks per game while shooting 51.4% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 71.0 points per game.Huskies: 5-5, averaging 73.7 points, 29.0 rebounds, 13.6 assists, 7.8 steals and 3.4 blocks per game while shooting 45.3% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 73.5 points.The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.