Tech titans flock to Trump’s inauguration in bid to influence policy in second term

Silicon Valley’s most prominent business leaders are expected to be in chilly Washington on Monday for President-elect Donald Trump’s second inauguration to warm relations with the incoming administration.Tech titans including the leaders of Meta, Amazon, Google, Tesla, TikTok, Apple, Alphabet, and OpenAI are set to attend the festivities, according to a source familiar, despite shifting plans due to the forecast frigid temperatures.INAUGURATION DAY 2025: EVERYTHING TO KNOW AHEAD OF TRUMP TAKING OFFICETikTok CEO Shou Chew’s attendance on Monday is especially noteworthy after the Supreme Court on Friday upheld a law that could lead to an imminent ban of the popular social media app. “He’s not my favorite guest to the Inauguration, but listen if he wants a job, if he wants to keep his job, I would suggest he go out there and sell his company,” said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), speaking to reporters on Friday. Elon Musk, the world’s richest person and a key adviser to Trump, had said he was “honored” in a post on his social platform X in response to a report that he would be seated alongside Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos during the ceremony. Seating arrangements for the inauguration could change after Trump announced the ceremony had been moved indoors. “In many ways, I think the recognition and embrace of this new administration by Big Tech is a good thing because these companies have treated Republicans so unfairly and have essentially censored us for many years,” said a GOP consultant granted anonymity to speak freely. “Now, they finally understand that our values and our perspective is the way the majority of the country feels and that’s a powerful thing.” The biggest names in the tech industry will not only be front and center during the inauguration, but they also made notable contributions to Trump’s second inauguration, with most giving bigger checks than in previous years, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.Microsoft is contributing $1 million, double its contributions in 2017 and 2021, while Google is tripling its offer to $1 million after giving $285,000 to Trump’s and President Joe Biden’s inaugurations in the past. In addition, Meta, Amazon, Uber, and OpenAI’s Sam Altman each donated at least $1 million to the inaugural fund. Zuckerberg is also co-hosting a black-tie reception along with GOP donor Miriam Adelson, reported by Puck. The incoming president has raised $200 million for the inauguration, according to a source familiar, breaking previous records.Following Trump’s election win, the tech executives each made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago to sit down with Trump in an effort to protect their corporate interests and advocate for new policies in this next term. “Everyone is trying to get in with the new administration and it’s a high-stakes game,” said a corporate lobbyist, speaking on the condition of anonymity to reflect on the situation. “In the next four years, there will likely be major regulations coming down the pike on social media safeguard, artificial intelligence, and antitrust investigations and everyone wants to be prepared — and these CEOs are doing the early legwork.”Many of these companies could benefit if the incoming Trump administration is lenient with regulation and antitrust enforcement. The fate of TikTok will now be in the hands of Trump, who had once called to ban the app but has since pledged to keep it available in the U.S., though it’s unclear how he will do that. Apple executives are likely eager to avoid new tariffs on their products as they did during Trump’s first term when the company won tariff carveouts on its products. The Federal Trade Commission is suing Meta over allegations that it has been anticompetitive with a trial looking imminent. Amazon and Space X are also major federal contractors.Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) views the attendance of top technology CEOs at the inauguration as an opportunity to begin discussions on new legislation, pointing out that he was the author of the landmark Telecommunications Act of 1996, which helped lay the groundwork for the digital revolution.“When they’re up there on the platform, these are the companies that are the principal beneficiaries of those three bills that I’m very proud of,” Markey said, speaking to the Washington Examiner on Thursday. “As I see them up there, I know that we need an AI civil rights act in the same way I know we need a teenage privacy bill of rights.

Donald Trump’s inauguration: From world leaders to tech giants; here’s the list of guests

To kick off the ceremony and herald the second inauguration as president, Donald Trump will be returning to Washington on Saturday. The official swearing-in ceremony will take place at 12 pm on January 20. Trump will be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States. The oath of office will be administered by Chief Justice John Roberts. 

Also, with the Arctic air expected to leave Washington in sub-freezing temperatures, the organisers have decided to move the swearing-in ceremony inside the Capitol Rotunda. 

Several important personalities including tech giants, celebrities, and political leaders are set to attend Trump’s second inauguration. 

Trump inauguration guest list: Who will attend

Tech giants including Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, Tesla CEO Elon Musk and TikTok CEO Shou Chew will be attending the presidential inauguration on Monday. 

Also, former US presidents, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama will be attending. 

Trump mega-donor Miriam Adelson, Tilman Fertitta, a television personality and billionaire owner of the Houston Rockets basketball team, businessman Todd Ricketts are among others. 

Celebrities including Carrie Underwood, classical singer Christopher Macchio will be performing at the inauguration events. The disco band Village People, who had supported Kamala Harris’s presidential bid, will be also be performing. 

Wrestler Logan Paul, Jake–who recently beat Mike Tyson, Dana White, the CEO of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, Hulk Hogan and actor Jon Voight are expected to make appearances. 

China’s vice-president Han Zheng, Argentina’s populist leader Javier Milei, Italy Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Nigel Farage, Britan’s champion of Brexit and the leader of the anti-immigration Reform party, Tom van Grieken of Belgium’s far-right Vlaams Belang and Mateusz Morawiecki of Poland’s national-conservative Law and Justice party (PiS) will be attending the ceremony. 

Robots to AI, the technology behind Trump’s plan to seal the Southern Border

Kevin Cohen, the CEO and co-founder of Tel Aviv-based startup RealEye, opens his computer, ready to introduce the tools that he believes will keep America’s borders more secure.

The screen fills with photos of people young and old, from all ethnicities, genders, and backgrounds. “We’re basically aggregating information from hundreds of thousands of sources online, not only to classify someone as a potential danger or threat, but also to indicate the probability of them meshing into various nefarious networks,” says Cohen. “We can take 50,000 individuals and within literally seconds, I can give you the insights and the indexing of their behavior.”

Pres. Donald Trump has vowed to seal the Southern Border from the moment he re-enters the White House this week. Bloomberg via Getty Images

RealEye has developed two AI-driven platforms, Masad and Fortress, that provide real-time vetting and “semi-active” monitoring of immigrants entering a country either legally or otherwise, with a history of illegal or suspicious activities. These tools draw not just on criminal records (which could be as innocuous as traffic violations), but also digital footprints left on social media and the dark web.

Cohen pulls up the profile of a man named Yosef, and instantly the man’s history appears like bullet points on the screen. “We can see that this specific individual funnels money to Hamas and other operatives,” says Cohen. “We know this guy is no good.”

Migrants and asylum-seekers along the US-Mexico border wait to be picked up US Border Patrol agents, who are increasingly facing staffing shortages just as the number of illegal arrivals surges. Joel Angel Juarez/The Republic / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Explore More

In just a few days, Donald Trump will be inaugurated for his second term as US president. He’s vowed that on Day One, his priority will be “the largest deportation operation in American history,” and there is “no price tag.” Trump’s plans to secure our Southern border include everything from a proposed hotline center for citizens to call in tips on undocumented migrants to building a massive immigration detention center on a 1,402-acre plot on the Rio Grande. Trump has also indicated his intention to continue construction of a 30-foot-high fence across the US-Mexico border. In fact, he’s considering declaring illegal immigration a national emergency to unlock funds for border wall construction. 

“We have to be smarter… and find more creative ways to make sure everybody crossing the border is who they say they are,” observes Kevin Cohen, CEO of RealEye, a Tel Aviv-based startup using artificial intelligence to prevent potentially dangerous criminals and security threats from crossing international borders. Courtesy of RealEye

In December, Trump even filed an amicus brief in support of a legal effort to stop the Biden administration from selling border wall materials. A court order put a stop to Biden’s efforts. Further emboldened, Trump will likely also revisit plans he’d considered in his first term, like floating barriers, which were briefly tested in the final year of his presidency. In 2023, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott picked up on the idea, constructing 1,000 feet of sphere buoys in a section of the Rio Grande. Despite attempts by the Biden administration to stop it, claiming the floating barriers violated the federal Rivers and Harbor Act, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last summer they could remain.

A composite image of a RealEye case-study, which uses tens of thousands of data points to identity potentially nefarious individuals looking to enter a country illegally. Courtesy of RealEye

Along with these physical barrier strategies, Artificial Intelligence-based strategies such as those found with RealEye will likely form a large part of both securing our Southern Border and Trump’s deportation strategy. The Department of Homeland Security has already been allocated $5 million in its 2025 budget to open an AI office, and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has called AI a “transformative technology.” Sam Altman, the OpenAI CEO who donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund, predicted that President Trump “will lead our country into the age of AI.”

Another AI company preparing for a busy year is Bavovna AI, a Ukrainian startup who’ve developed autonomous, AI-powered drones. Although drones have been used on the US border since 2005, they’ve been increasingly sabotaged by Mexican cartels with GPS-jammers. But Bavovna’s drones — already battle-tested in Ukraine’s war with Russia — can traverse complex landscapes without GPS or any visual odometry, thus evading detection.

Artificial intelligence, which has been embraced by companies like RealEye, is forming a key component of Trump’s likely migrant strategy. AI leaders such as OpenAI’s Sam Altman have contributed heavily to Trump’s inaguration. Getty Images

Like RealEye’s Cohen, Bavovna’s co-founder and director Pramax Prasolov, is tight-lipped about their relationship with the upcoming administration, other than saying they’re “exploring opportunities to support border security operations.” But on Christmas Eve, Prasolov hosted a special demo flight test in Tampa, Florida, whose guests included high-ranking officials from the Department of Defense and the US.Air Force.

“These UAVs are not just tools for surveillance but solutions for maintaining operational superiority in contested environments,” Prasolov says. It’s only a matter of time before “electronic warfare” becomes “essential to secure U.S. borders,” he says. 

Robotic dogs from Ghost Robotics, in use at Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fl in December, may be deployed along the Southern Border. REUTERS

AI is nothing new to the border; during Biden’s presidency, Democrats pushed for “smart border” technologies like virtual towers, which promised a more “humane” alternative to Trump’s border wall. And last fall, the bipartisan Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act was passed by the House compelling the DHS to explore how to best utilize AI, machine-learning and nanotechnologies in border security programs.

The Trump administration clearly appears on board. They “plan to increase the use of AI surveillance systems along the border,” says N. And Trump is taking off the safety bumpers. Biden signed an Executive Order in 2023, vowing a “safe, secure, and trustworthy” development of AI; Trump has promised to nullify it when he takes office.

Neil Sahota, an AI advisor to the United Nations AI for Good Initiative, says Trump may try to build both a “physical” wall and “digital” wall to regain control of the Southern Border. Courtesy of Neil Sahota

There are plans already in place to improve on the existing AI, like a proposed $101 million to upgrade and maintain surveillance towers. “These towers . . . detect and identify unauthorized crossings, and distinguish between humans, animals, and vehicles,” says Sahota. “Under a Trump administration, this initiative is expected to expand radically, turning his promise of a physical wall into a digital one.” In fact, Customs and Border Protection plans to complete a network of more than 1,000 surveillance towers by 2034.

There will also be a full introduction of “robodogs,” first unveiled by the DHS in 2022. These four-legged military-grade machines, developed by Philadelphia-based Ghost Robotics, “are designed to navigate challenging terrains, including sand, rocks, and human-made environments like stairs, making them well-suited for the diverse landscapes encountered along the border,” says Sahota. Although they’re currently still being tested by the DHS, Trump is enthusiastic enough about the technology to have at least one robodog on security patrol at Mar-a-Lago.

Floating buoys have been used to create a water-based border barrier in Texas. AFP via Getty Images

There have been concerns that the dogs could be weaponized, especially after some models were introduced with sniper rifles. The last company that attempted something similar, tech startup Brinc, faced public backlash in 2021 over drones they manufactured equipped with tasers. But Ghost Robotics CEO Gavin Kenneally assured a House Oversight Committee in 2023 that their technology would only be used for patrolling, not violence. (Ghost Robotics did not respond to requests for comment.) 

Some of the other AI being introduced isn’t quite so dystopian, but it’s no less complex. RealEye’s vetting system, for instance, goes beyond existing DHS strategies, which focus mostly on biometric indexing. This is insufficient, says Cohen, to intercept bad actors — such as terrorists or cartel members — who are exploiting the migration system to enter the US illegally. “You have somebody’s fingerprint and that’s it,” explains Cohen, who says his firm has partnered with intelligence agencies in Israel, Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan. “There’s no tracking of their digital presence…[to gauge] who these individuals are before they came into the country.”

Department of Homeland Security Chief Alejandro Mayorkas has described AI as a transformative technology in the effort to control illegal migration. Getty Images

Machine-learning technologies are also far better suited to identify patterns and anomalies that might be overlooked by border patrol agents — overwhelmed by the surge in Biden-era migrants and whose current staffing crunch has been called “unsustainable” by a DHS report in 2023. “Some AI systems…can analyze communication intercepts in multiple languages to identify potential security threats,” says Sahota. “AI can also…identify…unusual movement patterns near the border or irregular travel itineraries can be flagged for further investigation.”

Lawyer Marina Shepelsky worries that AI and other sophisticated digital technologies could possess inherent biases. “They can vet and deny people who have criticized Trump,” she says.

Although many of these tools are still being field-tested, there have already been success stories. In 2023, an AI model identified the unusual travel patterns of a truck making regular crossings at the U.S./Mexico border, and when police investigated, they discovered 75 kilograms of narcotics hidden in the vehicle.

But the rise of AI in border security isn’t giving everyone comfort. Sahota calls it a double-edged sword. “While AI offers vast potential to streamline operations and secure borders, its misuse—intentional or not—could lead to dangerous outcomes,” he says. “There’s a slippery slope where AI can be weaponized, eroding civil liberties, violating privacy, and fostering systemic bias. Under the Trump administration, the aggressive expansion of AI in border security could turn these tools into mechanisms for mass surveillance and control.”

A Ukranian-made drone by Bavovna AI. “These UAVs are not just tools for surveillance, but solutions for maintaining operational superiority in contested environments,” says Bavovna AI-director and co-founder Pramax Prasolov. Courtesy of Max Prasolov

Marina Shepelsky, the CEO, co-founder, and immigration attorney at New York-based Shepelsky Law Group, worries that AI vetting could have built-in biases. “They can vet and deny people who have criticized Trump,” she says. “Or anyone who has posted some religious Muslim thoughts, or anyone who has posted ‘communist’ thoughts on social media.”

The US Customs and Border Protection agency has plans to develop a network of over 1,000 surveillance towers along the Southern Border over the next decade. Joel Angel Juarez for NY Post

Cohen, however, thinks concerns about AI being abused are misdirected. “The ‘special interest aliens’ we’re going after are technically felons,” he says. “We’re not targeting individuals that are just trying to become breadwinners for their family or make a better life.” For Cohen, making life difficult for immigrants with criminal intentions is very much personal. As a teenager, his family briefly moved from Israel to Florida, and they lived next door to Mohammed Atta, who would become a ringleader of the September 11 attacks. 

“I’ve never stopped thinking about it,” he says. “That’s why we’re doing this, to keep guys like him . . . from making it into the country. We have to be smarter than them, and find more creative ways to make sure everybody crossing the border is who they say they are.”

How scientists with disabilities are making research labs and fieldwork more accessible

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. (AP) — The path to Lost Lake was steep and unpaved, lined with sharp rocks and holes.A group of scientists and students gingerly made their way, using canes or a helping hand to guide them. For those who couldn’t make the trek, a drone brought the lake — blue and narrow — into view.The field trip was designed to illustrate the challenges disabled researchers often face — and how barriers can be overcome.“Just because you can’t do it like someone else doesn’t mean you can’t do it,” said Anita Marshall, a University of Florida geologist leading the outing. The group included scientists with sight, hearing and mobility disabilities. Marshall’s organization ran the field trip to the lake along the San Andreas Fault, outside of San Bernadino. Her group — the International Association for Geoscience Diversity — and others are working to improve access to field and lab work so that those with disabilities feel welcome and stay.

Taormina Lepore, a Western Michigan University paleontologist who went on the trip, said scientists tend to value a single, traditional way of getting things done.

At Lost Lake, everyone got a view — even if they couldn’t physically get there.“It’s really about empathy, as much as it is about science,” said Lepore, who also researches science education.

Making research labs more accessibleDisabled people make up about 3% of the science, technology, engineering and math workforce, according to 2021 data from the National Science Foundation.Scientists with disabilities say that’s in part because labs, classrooms and field sites aren’t designed to accommodate them. Students and faculty are still told that they can’t work in a lab or do research safely, said Mark Leddy, who formerly managed disability-related grants for the National Science Foundation.The Americans with Disabilities Act, passed in 1990, sets minimum regulations for new buildings and labs, including ramps and wheelchair-accessible walkways.

But modifying older labs can be a complicated and lengthy process.Alyssa Paparella is working on her doctorate in biology at Baylor College of Medicine and founded an online community for disabled scientists. She said a science building at one of her former schools had no automatic buttons to open doors.“What is that saying about who you want actually working in the laboratories?” she said. “That’s the front door that they’re not even able to get in.”Leddy said researchers with disabilities are invaluable because of their life experiences. They have to constantly come up with creative ways to get past barriers in their lives — a problem-solving skill that’s indispensable in a lab.“If they don’t feel welcome, if they don’t get access, then how can they contribute that talent?” Leddy said.Venu Varanasi, a biomaterials engineer at the University of Texas at Arlington who has low vision, prints out signage using high-contrast color combinations and encourages his students to keep floors and counters clutter-free so he can navigate the lab more easily.He said those modifications also keep accidents to a minimum for non-disabled students.

“When you realize that you have a person with a disability, you have an opportunity, not a problem,” he said.At Purdue University in Indiana, engineering professor Brad Duerstock helped design an accessible biomedical lab years ago with support from the school and a National Institutes of Health grant, removing cabinets under sinks and fume hoods so that wheelchairs can easily pull up.The cost of making a lab more accessible varies depending on how extensive the changes are, Duerstock said. Some schools set aside money for improvements and science organizations can offer grants.

Accessibility in the outdoorsOn the California geology field trip, the group explored the lake carved into the landscape by the San Andreas Fault, where the grating of two tectonic plates can cause earthquakes.The group included rock enthusiasts at all different stages of their careers. A handful were students. Others were professors, eager to explore the outdoors in a group they could trust to look after them.Central Connecticut State University professor Jennifer Piatek, who uses a wheelchair, saw the lake through drone footage and used a pocket lens to examine rocks brought back by other participants.She said it was nice to be part of a community that anticipated her needs. For example, their bus pulled forward to park at a flatter location to make it easier for her to get off.You can learn a lot from images and maps, “but really you need to get to the space to be in it,” said Piatek, who studies planetary geology.Lepore, a neurodivergent person with low vision, scanned rocks using an artificial intelligence app that described their color and shape out loud.“Nature is not inherently accessible,” she said. “Nature just doesn’t have ramps and the kinds of things that we might wish it had. But there are so many workarounds and ways that we as geoscientists can make things truly open.”

Bushra Hussaini uses tips from the field trips to support interns and volunteers with disabilities at New York’s American Museum of Natural History, where she works. She said the supportive community of geologists is what keeps her coming back. “We learn from each other and we help each other,” she said. Before heading out, Marshall urged the participants to ask for a hand or a shoulder to lean on if needed. She and others from the organization have been leading field trips every year as an offshoot from the Geological Society of America’s annual meeting. As a doctoral student, Marshall would go on field trips with her peers only to wait back in the van, frustrated, because the organizers hadn’t thought about how to accommodate her disabilities. She wants things to be different for the next generation of scientists. “The whole point of these little day trips is to just plant that seed out there,” Marshall said, “that there’s another way forward.”___AP video journalist Eugene Garcia contributed to this report. ___The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Scientists find a giant new species. Its a delicacy.

Armored isopods crawl on the seafloor, feasting on fallen carrion. And they can grow quite big.So big, in fact, scientists reference the largest types as “supergiants.” Biologists have identified a new such species, Bathynomus vaderi, named for its resemblance to Star Wars’ Darth Vader — though, rest assured, these deep sea animals aren’t evil Siths.They reach a foot long, making them appear as striking 14-legged critters. And in recent years, they’ve apparently become a delicacy in Vietnam, as they’re caught by ocean trawlers. “Some go as far as claiming it’s more delicious than lobster, the ‘king of seafood,'” notes a press release about the discovery from Pensoft Publishers, a science literature publisher. “Some outlets and restaurants even advertise the sale of these ‘sea bugs’ online on various social media platforms, including how best to cook them!” the release added.
SEE ALSO:

The deep sea footage scientists filmed in 2024 is jaw-dropping

The research has been published in the science journal ZooKeys. The four Bathynomus vaderi specimens described came from dealers in coastal Quy Nhơn in south-central Vietnam, and were fished from the South China Sea.

Mashable Light Speed

Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories?
Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Light Speed newsletter.

By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Thanks for signing up!

The new identification underscores the great biodiversity of the ocean — much of which we know little about or have yet to find.”That a species as large as this could have stayed hidden for so long reminds us just how much work we still need to do to find out what lives in Southeast Asian waters,” the release noted.

One of the study’s authors, Nguyen Thanh So, holding another species of “supergiant” isopod in October 2024.
Credit: Peter Ng

Two Bathynomus vaderi indiviuals.
Credit: Rene Ong

Ocean research organizations are now vigilantly documenting and mapping the deep sea. Scientists want to shine a light — literally and figuratively — on what’s down there.The implications of knowing are incalculable, particularly as deep sea mineral prospectors prepare to run tank-like industrial equipment across parts of the seafloor. For example, research expeditions have found that ocean life carries great potential for novel medicines. “Systematic searches for new drugs have shown that marine invertebrates produce more antibiotic, anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory substances than any group of terrestrial organisms,” notes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Topics
Animals

Scientists find a giant new species. Its a delicacy.

Armored isopods crawl on the seafloor, feasting on fallen carrion. And they can grow quite big.So big, in fact, scientists reference the largest types as “supergiants.” Biologists have identified a new such species, Bathynomus vaderi, named for its resemblance to Star Wars’ Darth Vader — though, rest assured, these deep sea animals aren’t evil Siths.They reach a foot long, making them appear as striking 14-legged critters. And in recent years, they’ve apparently become a delicacy in Vietnam, as they’re caught by ocean trawlers. “Some go as far as claiming it’s more delicious than lobster, the ‘king of seafood,'” notes a press release about the discovery from Pensoft Publishers, a science literature publisher. “Some outlets and restaurants even advertise the sale of these ‘sea bugs’ online on various social media platforms, including how best to cook them!” the release added.
SEE ALSO:

The deep sea footage scientists filmed in 2024 is jaw-dropping

The research has been published in the science journal ZooKeys. The four Bathynomus vaderi specimens described came from dealers in coastal Quy Nhơn in south-central Vietnam, and were fished from the South China Sea.

Mashable Light Speed

Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories?
Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Light Speed newsletter.

By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Thanks for signing up!

The new identification underscores the great biodiversity of the ocean — much of which we know little about or have yet to find.”That a species as large as this could have stayed hidden for so long reminds us just how much work we still need to do to find out what lives in Southeast Asian waters,” the release noted.

One of the study’s authors, Nguyen Thanh So, holding another species of “supergiant” isopod in October 2024.
Credit: Peter Ng

Two Bathynomus vaderi indiviuals.
Credit: Rene Ong

Ocean research organizations are now vigilantly documenting and mapping the deep sea. Scientists want to shine a light — literally and figuratively — on what’s down there.The implications of knowing are incalculable, particularly as deep sea mineral prospectors prepare to run tank-like industrial equipment across parts of the seafloor. For example, research expeditions have found that ocean life carries great potential for novel medicines. “Systematic searches for new drugs have shown that marine invertebrates produce more antibiotic, anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory substances than any group of terrestrial organisms,” notes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Topics
Animals

The bros’ new clothes: How Big Tech lurched to the right

The sight of Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg sitting together at Donald Trump’s inauguration — as they reportedly will do Monday — would be a shock for their 2016 selves.Back then, these titans of the tech world were way to the left of Trump, whose political stances put him about as far to the right as Republicans get, then and now. Musk, once a vocal Barack Obama supporter, voted for Trump’s opponent Hillary Clinton in 2016. The Bezos of that year blasted candidate Trump for “eroding democracy.” Zuckerberg didn’t make an endorsement, but the issues he put his money behind at the time — social justice, inequality, easing the immigration process — put him squarely on the Democratic side of the political line. The most vocal tech world supporter of Trump in 2016, Paypal co-founder Peter Thiel, was seen as an outlier back then: Silicon Valley was solid blue. Now the outlier is Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who hasn’t donated to Trump’s inauguration fund and won’t be attending. All the other big names in tech will be there: Apple’s Tim Cook, Google’s Sundar Pichai, Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and TikTok’s Shou Chew, have all donated $1 million or more, and all save Altman will be in attendance. What happened? It wasn’t just that these men were made so much richer by a stock market rally following Trump’s election in November. A similar rally happened in November 2016 as well, and it didn’t make tech CEOs any less reluctant at a Trump Tower meeting with the president-elect. That was the roundtable where Thiel’s smile stood out in a sea of grimaces.Paypal co-founder Peter Thiel, left, and Apple CEO Tim Cook display very different reactions to Donald Trump speaking after his 2016 election.Credit: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty ImagesThe process of tech leaders learning to love Trump may have begun piecemeal during his first administration. But it only really kicked into high gear over the course of 2024, with a speed and ferocity that has left many observers’ heads spinning. No wonder President Biden, in his farewell address, warned of a tech-led “oligarchy” that may threaten democracy itself. To understand what happened, let’s take a look at the three richest tech bros, who also happen to be the three wealthiest men in the world, and the journey they took from opposing Trump in 2023 to sitting together at his inauguration in 2025. Elon MuskNowadays, of course, Musk is so central in Trump’s camp that he is sometimes described as the incoming “co-president.” He donated $250 million, spoke at Trump rallies, called himself “Dark MAGA,” and clearly put more than a thumb on the scale for Trump on Twitter/X throughout the fall of 2024. Musk’s America PAC seized the @America account from its original owner, and even now faces a fresh lawsuit from Pennsylvania’s Attorney General over that PAC’s dubious $1 million lottery for swing state voters. But it’s important to remember that Musk wasn’t always this far right, and his turn towards Trump came fairly recently. Yes, he joined Trump’s business council in 2017, but he also quit when Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate accords. Back then, the Bay Area-based Burning Man attendee was still happy to support Pride month.Musk drifted rightwards during the pandemic years, when he moved Tesla HQ to Texas and, according to reports, began feuding with his trans daughter. The drift seems to have accelerated when he bought Twitter in 2022, started tweeting about the “woke mind virus,” and endorsed the GOP (unsuccessfully) in that year’s midterm elections. Even then, Musk was no Trump fan. In 2023 he helped launch Florida governor Ron DeSantis’ presidential campaign in a disastrous Twitter Spaces. Musk’s statement that Trump should “sail into the sunset” prompted a brief feud with the former president. “I could have said, “drop to your knees and beg,” and he would have done it,” Trump responded, recalling an Oval Office meeting in his first term. Then came 2024, and three key events. First, DeSantis dropped out in January. Then on May 31, Donald Trump’s conviction in a New York courtroom over hush money payments that possibly swung a close 2016 election his way. Musk fumed that the charges were “trivial” and politically motivated. By then, perhaps not coincidentally, Trump was already talking to Musk about a possible advisory role — and we were starting to learn just how many federal agencies were investigating Musk.But the deal was sealed in July when Trump survived a shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania. Musk “fully endorsed” Trump on Twitter that day, then made his first appearance with Trump on his return to Butler in October. By then, Trump had already promised Musk his Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, the advisory group that Musk is set to lead along with fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy. The latest reports on DOGE say that Musk will have an office inside the White House itself. Notably, Musk did not have to drop to his knees and beg for any of this. Which leads us to wonder: who is really on whose leash here? Jeff BezosIn the 2016 election, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos was one of Trump’s most outspoken critics in the tech world. A month after Trump entered the White House, Bezos’ Washington Post unveiled its pointed new slogan, echoing its owner’s warnings: “Democracy dies in darkness.” Bezos and the Post’s coverage continued to earn Trump’s ire. Two years later, in an equally pithy Medium post, Bezos attacked Trump ally David Pecker, head of the company that owns the National Enquirer, for what Bezos said was blackmail over nude photos of the billionaire. But a curious thing had started to happen by then. With his growing wealth, which spiked in the late 2010s, plus his new marriage and new yacht, Bezos started to develop a serious case of Rich Guy Brain. By 2022, his tone on social media had changed entirely, becoming much more Musk-like. No longer was Bezos skewering his Trumpian opponents for literally threatening to expose his ass; instead, he was discussing compliments on his ass. Finally came the moment that Bezos’ opposition broke. His top lieutenant at the Post told staffers there would be no presidential endorsement in 2024 — which, if democracy was still at risk, seemed a curious case of fence-sitting. (Indeed, the Post staff had prepared a Kamala Harris endorsement that was effectively spiked.) More than 200,000 Post subscribers cancelled their subscription in disgust. Still, Bezos seemed unmoved. This time he penned a piece explaining that newspaper endorsements didn’t matter. It was, he said, a complete coincidence that Trump was visiting his space company Blue Origin the same day. After the election, Bezos continued his shift towards Trump. In a December interview he said the incoming president was “calmer” and had “grown a lot over the last eight years.” Time will tell whether that’s true, or whether Bezos has simply shifted to the side of Dark MAGA. Mark ZuckerbergUnlike Musk and Bezos, who moved Trumpwards all at once, the Facebook founder seems to have slalomed back and forth in his attempts to placate Republicans in Washington since Trump first took office.Prior to Trump’s first election, Zuckerberg was easily the most liberal of this Big Tech trio. As a New York Times investigation during election season noted, he helped found Fwd.us, an advocacy group dedicated to giving undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship. The Zuckerberg-Chan initiative spent nearly half a trillion dollars on causes such as legalizing drugs, reducing the number of people in U.S. prisons, and promoting universal healthcare. But then in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 election, Zuckerberg quickly tossed aside claims that unchecked fake news on Facebook had contributed to Trump’s victory. He later regretted that stance, but not enough to avoid being dubbed Misinformer of the Year in 2017 by the watchdog group Media Matters for America. Zuckerberg’s response to Trump’s first election was twofold: he minimized the presence of news posts in Facebook feeds, which unintentionally contributed to a widespread crash in readership for media entities. And he set up a fact-checking service, which often earned the ire of conservative groups. The fact-checking service was nuked in January 2025, pleasing the incoming Trump administration. Often wanting to appear amenable to conservative concerns about the news feed and which stories get promoted, Zuckerberg made repeated changes to the algorithm that boosted pro-GOP voices. When internal data showed right-wing news sites like the Daily Caller were getting more interactions on Facebook than anyone else, Zuckerberg nixed the release of that data. The more amenable he is, however, the more conservative voices (including Musk) complain — an old tactic called “playing the ref.” Now Zuckerberg has morphed again, apologizing even for his donation to election integrity groups in 2020. Most recently, he told Joe Rogan that corporate America needs more “masculine energy.”What that means for the social media giant remains to be seen, but America is certainly about to get a lot more oligarch energy from Zuck and his fellow tech bros.

Washington board opposes new state solar legislation

President-elect and self-proclaimed “tariff man” Donald Trump has vowed a “manufacturing renaissance,” pledging tariffs to bolster US-made products and reduce import reliance. Trump plans to impose tariffs ranging from 60% to 100% on Chinese goods sold to American businesses, and a 20% universal tariff on other global imports. His aim is to increase the price of imported goods to make American-made products more appealing. During his first term, Trump placed tariffs on solar panels, washing machines and certain metals, which were kept by the Biden administration. Economists see Trump’s proposal as a double-edged sword, as although it could rebalance the US economy, it may lead to higher interest rates and reignite inflation. The tariffs are estimated to cost a typical American household over $2,600 a year, and could cost American consumers between $46 billion and $78 billion in spending power each year. “[There will be] some increase in costs – that’s the price you pay – but the benefit is it will begin to put in place some industrial capability in the United States that I think is desperately needed. I think it’s needed for jobs. I think it’s needed for middle, industrial class and lower-skilled workers all over the country,” said Bayard Winthrop, founder and CEO of apparel manufacturer American Giant. According to pro-tariff researchers, a 10% universal tariff could create 2.8 million jobs. Although Trump’s previous tariffs boosted steel jobs, it harmed import-reliant industries and exports. Large economies such as such as China, the United Kingdom and the European Union are preparing for a large economic blow throughout Trump’s term due to his proposed tariffs. Experts have emphasized the need for a “strategic application” of tariffs, recommending a “gradual increase over time.”
unbranded – Newsworthy

Senate Bill 1190

BRISTOL HERALD COURIER

The Washington County Board of Supervisors passed a resolution Tuesday formally opposing a new Virginia state Senate bill that seeks to strip away local control from governing solar energy projects.“I oppose this with every bone in my body,“ Supervisor Saul Hernandez said at Tuesday’s meeting in Abingdon, Virginia. “And, when you look at it, it’s absolutely horrible.“The bill, carried by Sen. Creigh Deeds, D-Charlottesville, would create the Virginia Energy Facility Review Board. The purpose of the board is to review proposed energy projects, such as solar farms, according to Hernandez.Senate Bill 1190 “requires the Review Board to issue a regional energy report that models each planning district’s meaningful annual contribution to clean energy generation, energy efficiency measures, and energy storage.”

People are also reading…

It further “requires the Review Board to establish a model local ordinance for siting, permitting and zoning of critical interconnection projects and all other ground-mounted front-of-meter solar energy and energy storage projects.The bill also would require each locality to adopt an ordinance for the permitting of solar energy facilities and energy storage facilities, that is consistent with the Commonwealth Clean Energy Policy and the model ordinance and submit it to the Review Board.On Thursday the legislation was referred from the General Laws and Technology Committee to the Committee on Commerce and Labor by a unanimous 15-0 vote.On Tuesday, Hernandez said he was not against renewable energy or solar projects, but added, “I am against this overreach.”The state board would review applications for solar projects, then would recommend these proposals to local governments, Hernandez said.If the local government rejected a proposed plan, a developer could then take the locality to court and settle the matter in Circuit Court, Hernandez said.Hernandez recalled how the county leaders in 2024 investigated a proposed project by Texas-based Catalyst Energy to place solar panels on about 2,000 acres of land zoned both industrial and agricultural.“It never actually came to our board for a vote,” Hernandez said. “It went to the Planning Commission, and they rejected it. But I think we all know how it would have gone had it come to us.”Hernandez called the proposed legislation “arrogant” and said it undermines local governments ability to set forth zoning, which was established in Washington County in 1971.This state board would require localities to adopt a solar ordinance consistent with a statewide model, Hernandez said.That could be in conflict with a proposed ordinance change that is slated to come for review by the Planning Commission later this month, which will limit any and all solar farms to 5 acres in Washington County.This legislation would mean that the county leaders would have to “defend“ any positions “to some state bureaucrat,“ Hernandez said.“I know the reason they’re doing this. The Commonwealth of Virginia has written a check it can’t cash,” Hernandez said, referring to the Clean Economy Act, a mandate that Virginia must turn more towards renewable energy by 2035.The supervisor said he wants to evaluate any project in the county and not have the state tell him what’s good for the Tyler District that he represents.“They don’t know anything about the Tyler District. I do. I live in it,” he said.On a motion by Hernandez, the board voted unanimously to pass the resolution opposing the state legislation.“This is a good statement being made by our board of supervisors that we are against these activities that are an overreach of state power,“ Supervisor Dwayne Ball said.Urban areas “do not eat without us,” Ball said. “They didn’t build their cities without our coal.”This legislation “opens a Pandora’s box” that could tell a county “what to do with our own land,” Ball said.Supervisor, Wayne Stevens said the legislation makes him “mad” on how “they’re trying to go around the corner on us and leave us holding an empty bag.”
#lee-outstream-wrap {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
max-width: 800px;
margin: 0 auto;
display: none;
position: relative;
}
#lee-outstream-wrap .ima-controls-div { z-index: 99; }
#lee-outstream-wrap .lee-outstream-video {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 56.25%;
height: 0;
}
#lee-outstream-wrap .lee-outstream-video video {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index:1;
}
#lee-outstream-close {
display: none;
position: absolute;
cursor: pointer;
top: -25px;
left: -25px;
padding: 10px;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #000;
border-radius: 20px;
color: #fff;
z-index: 99;
line-height: 0;
box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4) 0px 0px 5px 0px;
}
#lee-outstream-close:hover { color: rgba(255,255,255,.8); }
#lee-outstream-wrap.sticky {
position: fixed;
bottom:0;
right:0;
width: 400px;
z-index: 1000;
height: auto;
box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4) 0px 0px 10px 0px;
}
#lee-outstream-wrap.sticky #lee-outstream-close{ display: block; }
@media (max-width: 767px){
#lee-outstream-wrap.sticky { width: 60%; }
}

[email protected]