S Hussain Zaidi’s new book on Dawood Ibrahim introduces readers to his close aide Salim ‘Kutta’

Dawood Ibrahim’s close aide Salim ‘Kutta’.

Salim Mira Moideen Shaikh was one of the strongest men in the D-Company. He was also always ready for a fight. Due to his rabid nature and dark complexion, he was nicknamed Salim Kutta. He was a native of Kotta Nellore in Tamil Nadu. In Mumbai, he was involved in rioting cases.“But how did Salim get involved in the blasts?” I asked. His name also evoked a reaction from Neeraj Kumar, who had conducted a cross-border operation to arrest him; a surgical arrest in the mid-1990s, for sure, if not a strike.Salim Kutta used to be a bodyguard for the Dossa family. Mohammad Dossa used to help Salim with medical expenses and gained the latter’s undying loyalty. Salim’s violent nature was of good use for Dossa. In the late 1980s, Salim was also part of a gang known as the “Arjun” gang which was modelled after the gang led by Sunny Deol in his superhit film of the same name. This gang also had the blessings of Mustafa Dossa aka Mustafa Majnu. By 1992, Salim was firmly entrenched in Mohammad Dossa’s good books. Members of the Arjun gang were also sent to Pakistan for training in the usage of arms and ammunition.While Neeraj Kumar was investigating the bombings, he was hell-bent on chasing down those who played a key role in the bombings.Salim had participated in landing the arms and ammunition at the Gosabara Coast in Gujarat. These were used for the Black Friday bombings in 1993. Hence, he was on the radar of the Gujarat Police. The Gujarat landings were orchestrated by Mustafa Dossa, whereas two other landings were organized by Tiger Memon at Dighi and Shekhadi coasts in Raigad district of Maharashtra. Thus, Salim Kutta became a natural target for Neeraj Kumar.After weeks of waiting, things heated up with the arrival of an intelligence report at the CBI headquarters in New Delhi. Holding the INTREP in his hands, and reading it over and over again, Neeraj Kumar (then joint director of the CBI) made a concrete effort to keep his zeal in control.The CBI Headquarters had pint-sized cabins for members of their Special Task Force who were investigating the blasts. The walls of those cabins were so thin that officers seated in adjacent cabins could hear each other’s conversations even if they were top secret! For this precise reason, Kumar resisted the urge to call his juniors to his cabin and brief them about the report which had come from India’s top agency – the famed Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW).According to the report, dreaded terrorist Salim Kutta, an accused in the Bombay bomb blasts, was said to be working at a grocery shop named “Abhinandan” in Kathmandu. There were also reports of two other accused, Shabir and Firoz, who were said to be spotted around the same area in Kathmandu. Neeraj Kumar stifled a chuckle. Who could have imagined that a most wanted man from the D-Company would be hiding in a grocery shop in Nepal’s capital?In all honesty, Kumar expected this intel to turn out to be another dud, the likes of which would get thrown at them with abandon in this game of cops and criminals. Now he had two options. To put in a half-hearted attempt or go all in. He gave it some serious thought and allowed his policeman’s instincts to take over. Finally, he decided to take a leap of faith.But there was one problem in going after Salim Kutta. Though he oversaw the STF, Kumar lacked the manpower he would need to arrest Kutta if the intel was legit. The CBI is a tremendously understaffed organization suffering from a perennial crunch in resources.Kumar was aware that his batchmate from the IPS academy, Kuldeep Sharma, who was currently working with Gujarat Police, was also on the lookout for Salim Kutta as the criminal had taken part in landing explosives and ammunition on the coast of Gujarat.Since they had trained together at the police academy, Kumar decided to team up with Kuldeep Sharma and launch an operation to arrest Salim. Another officer from the Jammu and Kashmir cadre was chosen by Kumar as a part of the CBI team for this mission.The joint team reached Kathmandu and camped at the Annapoorna Hotel while awaiting formal approval from the Nepal government to commence their operation.Contrary to popular belief, the CBI is barred from carrying out any secret operations that are not sanctioned by the government. This is the direct result of the diplomacy involved between the two countries and the fact that the CBI reports directly to the Central government. Misadventures or even the slightest of mistakes of the CBI can cause direct embarrassment to the prime minister’s office. Kumar was bound to the established protocol and procedures.The red tape of bureaucracy began taking its toll. As with any kind of government work, there was an inordinate amount of delay in procuring the requisite approvals. Kumar was getting edgier by the minute. What if Salim got wind of their plans? If he escaped now, tracking him again would prove to be a monumental task.Kumar decided to act. He took along his CBI subordinates and a sub-inspector from Nepal Police down the streets of Kathmandu in a private vehicle. He wanted to inspect the location of the Abhinandan grocery shop where the three suspects (Salim, Shabir and Firoz) were supposedly working.The team finally reached a spot from where they could keep an eye on the shop but they were still unsure of the presence of their quarry. Kumar spotted a telephone booth located right in front of the shop. On the pretext of making a call, Kumar entered the booth to get a closer look at the people inside the store. Much to Kumar’s surprise, a tall, muscled man was seated at the counter of the shop. From the photographs sent by the R&AW, Kumar recognized the man as none other than Salim Kutta!Excerpted with permission from From Dubai To Karachi: The Dawood Saga Continues, S Hussain Zaidi, Penguin India.

China’s AI chatbot DeepSeek shocked Big Tech, but questions over data security remain

Back in 2023, OpenAI founder Sam Altman dismissed the idea of building a competitive Artificial Intelligence (AI) model on what then seemed like a meagre US$10 million (S$13.5 million) budget.
“It’s totally hopeless to compete with us on training foundation models,” Altman declared, fielding a question from the audience at an Economic Times Conversations event.

Two years later, Altman’s dismissal seems to have been proven completely wrong with the debut of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI chatbot that was ostensibly trained for just US$5.6 million (S$7.6 million).
DeepSeek is thus challenging entrenched assumptions about the AI industry, and shaking up the “Big Tech” world.
It’s not just “Big Tech” that is spooked by DeepSeek’s debut, however.
Concerns have been raised about the security of the information being fed to the Chinese AI chatbot, and the degree to which it might allow the Chinese state to exploit user data.
The White House, for instance, is evaluating the application on national security grounds, Reuters reported.
Either way, as United States President Donald Trump put it, the application is indeed a “wake-up call” for both the overlords of the tech world, as well as for national security watchdogs around the world.
‘You don’t need a billion-dollar data centre anymore.’: Ho Ching
Former CEO of Temasek Holdings Ho Ching, made a post on Facebook about DeepSeek’s disruption, explaining why it is “blowing people’s minds”.
While AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini require “billion-dollar data centres” replete with expensive graphics processing units (GPUs), DeepSeek achieved comparable results on a relatively lean budget, and with a “few good GPUs”.
Nvidia’s high-cost H100 chips, for instance, were once seen as vital for generative AI technology, making it one of the most valuable companies in the world:
DeepSeek, however, claims to have not used Nvidia’s H100 chips, which are banned in China, to train its AI model.
As a result, DeepSeek’s debut caused an upheaval in the stock market and wiped nearly US$600 million (S$810.6 million) off Nvidia’s market capitalisation.
As Ho put it, “the ‘moats’ of big tech companies look more like puddles” now.
Not everyone believes DeepSeek’s claims, however. Tesla’s chief executive officer (CEO) Elon Musk, for instance, believes that it is “obvious” that DeepSeek is surreptitiously using the H100 chips.
Musk’s suspicion is not unfounded, given that there have been allegations of H100 chips being secretly smuggled into China in the past.
Nevertheless, Ho believes that there is no catch to DeepSeek’s success.
“Anyone can check their work. The code is public. The technical papers explain everything. It’s not magic, just incredibly clever engineering,” she wrote. 
But, could the chatbot be spying on you?
DeepSeek has become one of the most downloaded apps on Apple’s app store in countries such as Singapore and the UK.
Experts who spoke to The Guardian, however, expressed concerns that the Chinese state may be using DeepSeek to gather data or information.
Currently, there is no concrete proof that data submitted to the chatbot is indeed compromised.
All the same, China’s national intelligence law states that “all state organs, armed forces, political parties, social groups, enterprises, public institutions, organisations and citizens, shall support, assist and cooperate with national intelligence efforts.”
Former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng, for instance, posted to Facebook that he deleted the DeepSeek app as it “stores data in China and censors stuff”:
The chatbot certainly is quite circumspect when it comes to taboo topics in Chinese politics, such as the Tiananmen massacre of 1989 or territorial claims in the South China Sea, reflecting party lines on these matters.
So, share your data and information with DeepSeek at your own risk.
“An inflection point”
Moving forward, DeepSeek appears set to radically change the AI industry.
Ho explained how DeepSeek’s debut sent up ‘big tech’ companies like Meta, Google and OpenAI:
“DeepSeek did this with a team of less than 200 people. Meanwhile, Meta has teams where the compensation alone exceeds DeepSeek’s entire training budget … and their models aren’t as good.”
Ho argued that DeepSeek’s disruption will make AI development far more accessible, thus increasing competition.
Ho added:
“This feels like one of those moments we’ll look back on as an inflection point. Like when PCs made mainframes less relevant, or when cloud computing changed everything.
AI is about to become a lot more accessible, and a lot less expensive. The question isn’t if this will disrupt the current players, but how fast?”
Top photo from DeepSeek. 

Chinese app shakes up AI race

A small Chinese company sent shockwaves around the tech world this week with news that it has created a high-performing artificial intelligence system with less computing power and at a lower cost than ones made by U.S. tech giants. Michelle Quinn reports. This post was originally published on here

CDFD scientist elected as Fellow of Indian Academy of Sciences

Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD) has announced that staff scientist and head of the lab of cell signalling Rashna Bhandari has been elected as a Fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences. The fellowship is awarded to individuals who have made exceptional contributions to science and have demonstrated sustained excellence in research. Dr. Bhandari’s work in the study of cellular signaling pathways and their role in disease mechanisms has significantly advanced the understanding of cellular processes and their implications for therapeutic applications, as per a press release issued on Wednesday (January 29, 2025) Published – January 30, 2025 12:01 pm IST
Read Comments
Copy link

Email

Facebook

Twitter

Telegram

LinkedIn

WhatsApp

Reddit

Remove

SEE ALL
PRINT

Science drives Maine’s economy. Congress must protect it.

The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Jacquelyn Gill is a professor of paleoecology and plant ecology in the School of Biology and Ecology at the University of Maine. This work reflects her personal views and expertise; she does not speak on behalf of the university.

Maine has a long history of innovation, from shipbuilding to forestry to biomedical research. Federal investment in science is a key driver of our state’s economy, fueling job growth, education, and cutting-edge discoveries that benefit all Mainers. Yet the Trump Administration’s recent disruptions to research funding threaten this progress. Pausing or canceling these investments isn’t just a setback for scientists — it’s a direct blow to Maine’s workforce, economy, and public health.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) are two of the most effective engines of American innovation. NIH-funded research has played a critical role in medical breakthroughs, from cancer treatments to vaccines. In Maine, NIH-funded scientists are developing treatments for addiction, glaucoma, and muscular diseases — advances that could save lives and reduce healthcare costs.

In 2023 alone, NIH investments brought $116 million into Maine, supporting 1,470 jobs and generating $262 million in economic activity. That’s a return on investment Maine can’t afford to lose.

NSF funding is just as crucial. Established in 1950 with broad bipartisan support, the National Science Foundation has driven technological and educational advances that keep the U.S. globally competitive. Today, Maine researchers are using NSF funds to develop new manufacturing technologies, train teachers in rural schools, and improve agricultural practices for potato farmers. With over $30 million in active NSF grants, these investments create opportunities for Maine businesses, schools, and communities.

Federal funding for science isn’t just about research, it’s about jobs. More than one-third of Maine’s workforce is in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) fields, from biopharmaceuticals to environmental science. The life sciences sector alone employed over 10,000 Mainers in 2024 and is projected to grow even further. These are high-paying, stable jobs that keep Maine’s economy strong.

The University of Maine, which achieved R1 research status in 2022, is a national leader in STEM education, and the largest recipient of federal research dollars in the state. Federal grants allow students to gain hands-on training in fields like biotechnology, engineering, and environmental science. These programs don’t just educate — they retain talent, ensuring that Maine’s best and brightest stay here to become our doctors, engineers, and entrepreneurs. Much of this work is fueled by scholarships, research opportunities, and training programs funded by NIH and NSF.

Supporting science is good policy and good economics. These research funds were already approved by Congress and are among the most scrutinized and accountable expenditures in the federal budget. Cutting or delaying them jeopardizes Maine’s economic future.

Rep. Jared Golden, Sen. Angus King, and Sen. Susan Collins have long championed Maine’s workforce and industries. Now, they must act swiftly to protect the scientific infrastructure that fuels our state’s economy and wellbeing.

When science thrives, Maine thrives. Let’s keep it that way.

More articles from the BDN

Trier: Cute Winter Boots

On the not-at-all spyware app TikTok, keyboard revolutionaries have attempted to craft their own coded language to bypass alleged TikTok censorship. Many users have claimed the app is censoring political videos–specifically, Trump resistance content. They argue the reach of this content on TikTok’s ‘for you page’ –a page on the app that pushes content expected…

I will not hide

I find myself in a space where I want to write about this moment — about the fear, sadness, disappointment and anger I feel — but I’m struggling to find the words I want to say. I have a lot of thoughts on all the things, but I’ll stick to transgender issues for now. Did…

Burning, Bestselling And Beautiful Books Nominated For 2025 Ockham New Zealand Book Awards

Thursday, 30 January 2025, 6:36 pmPress Release: Ockham New Zealand Book Awards

Popular
books that pack a punch and have hit the mark with readers
across the motu in the past year have also found favour with
the judges of the 2025 Ockham New Zealand Book Awards, who
reveal their longlists today. Unforgettable and
amusing memoirs, novels that move and unnerve, illustrated
books that powerfully illuminate the past and present, and
sizzling, considered poetry collections are among the 43
books longlisted from 175
entries. Established authors
dominate this year’s longlist; nine of the books nominated
are by first-time published writers. They are represented by
19 publishers, from large multinational publishing houses to
bijou presses. New Zealand Book
Awards Trust Te Ohu Tiaki i Te Rau Hiringa chair Nicola
Legat says this year’s longlist is a testament to the
talent of their authors and the farsighted publishers who
back them. “Across poetry, prose and
non-fiction the list includes books by some of our finest
thinkers and most inventive writers. Some tackle today’s
burning issues and others are entertaining and escapist
reads. All deserve our admiration. “The 2025
longlist is one of great riches. The judges have a difficult
job ahead of them to select the shortlists and eventual
winners,” she says. The 2025 Ockham
New Zealand Book Awards longlisted books
are:

Advertisement – scroll to continue reading

*represents debut
authors Jann
Medlicott Acorn Prize for
FictionAll That We
Know by Shilo Kino
(Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Maniapoto) (Moa
Press)Amma
by Saraid de Silva (Moa
Press)*Ash
by Louise Wallace (Te Herenga Waka
University Press)At the Grand Glacier
Hotel by Laurence
Fearnley (Penguin, Penguin Random
House)Delirious
by Damien Wilkins (Te Herenga Waka
University
Press)Kataraina
by Becky Manawatu (Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti
Māmoe, Waitaha) (Mākaro
Press) Poorhara
by Michelle Rahurahu (Ngāti Rahurahu,
Ngāti Tahu–Ngāti Whaoa) (Te Herenga Waka
University Press)*Pretty
Ugly by Kirsty Gunn
(Otago University Press)The
Mires by Tina Makereti
(Te Ātiawa, Ngāti Tūwharetoa, Ngāti Rangatahi-Matakore,
Pākehā) (Ultimo Press)The Royal
Free by Carl Shuker
(Te Herenga Waka University
Press)Mary and Peter Biggs Award for
PoetryFox Spirit on a Distant
Cloud by Lee Murray
(The Cuba Press)Hibiscus
Tart by Carin Smeaton (Titus
Books)Hopurangi – Songcatcher: Poems from
the Maramataka by Robert
Sullivan (Ngāpuhi, Kāi Tahu)
(Auckland University Press)In the
Half Light of a Dying Day by C.K.
Stead (Auckland University
Press)Liar, Liar, Lick, Spit
by Emma Neale (Otago University
Press)Manuali
i by Rex Letoa
Paget (Saufoi
Press)*/Slanted by
Alison Glenny (Compound
Press)Slender Volumes by
Richard von Sturmer (Spoor
Books)Slim Volume
by James
Brown (Te Herenga Waka
University Press)The Girls in the Red
House are Singing by
Tracey Slaughter (Te Herenga Waka University
Press)BookHub Award for Illustrated
Non-FictionA Different Light:
First Photographs of Aotearoa by
Catherine Hammond and Shaun Higgins
(Auckland University Press)Edith Collier:
Early New Zealand Modernist by Jill
Trevelyan, Jennifer Taylor and Greg Donson (Massey
University Press)Fenoga Tāonga Niue I
Aotearoa: Niue Heritage Journey in Aotearoa by
Molima Nolly Pihigia, Toluma’anave Barbara
Makuati-Afitu, Kolokesa Uafā Māhina-Tuai, Hikule’o
Fe’aomoeako Melaia Māhina and Janson Chau (Mafola
Press)Force of Nature Te Aumangea o Te Ao
Tūroa: A Conservation History of Forest & Bird
1923-2023 by David Young and Naomi
Arnold (Potton &
Burton)Golden Enterprise: New Zealand
Chinese Merchants 1860s-1970s by Phoebe
H. Li (Chinese Poll Tax Heritage
Trust)Leslie Adkin: Farmer
Photographer by Athol McCredie
(Te Papa Press)Sam the Trap Man: Cracking
Yarns and Tall Tales from the Bush by
Sam Gibson (Allen & Unwin New
Zealand)*Sight Lines:
Women and Art in Aotearoa by Kirsty
Baker (Auckland University
Press)*Te Ata o Tū The
Shadow of Tūmatauenga: The New Zealand Wars Collections of
Te Papa by Matiu Baker (Ngāti Toa
Rangatira, Te Āti Awa, Ngāti Raukawa, Ngāti Whakaue),
Katie Cooper, Michael Fitzgerald and Rebecca Rice
(Te Papa Press)Toi Te Mana: An Indigenous
History of Māori Art by Deidre Brown
(Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Kahu) and Ngarino Ellis (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti
Porou) with Jonathan Mane-Wheoki (Ngāpuhi,
Te Aupōuri, Ngāti Kurī) (Auckland University
Press)General Non-Fiction
AwardBad Archive by
Flora Feltham (Te Herenga Waka University
Press)*Becoming Aotearoa:
A New History of New Zealand by Michael
Belgrave (Massey University
Press)Feijoa: A Story of Obsession &
Belonging by Kate Evans (Moa
Press)*Hard by the Cloud
House by Peter Walker (Massey
University Press)Hine Toa: A Story of
Bravery by Ngāhuia Te
Awekōtuku (Te Arawa, Tūhoe, Ngāpuhi,
Waikato) (HarperCollins Publishers Aotearoa New
Zealand)Kahurangi: The Nature of Kahurangi
National Park and Northwest Nelson by
Dave Hansford (Potton &
Burton)The Beautiful
Afternoon by Airini Beautrais
(Te Herenga Waka University Press)The
Chthonic Cycle by Una
Cruickshank (Te Herenga Waka University
Press)*The Invasion of
Waikato Te Riri ki Tainui by Vincent
O’Malley (Bridget Williams
Books)The Mermaid Chronicles: A Midlife
Mer-moir by Megan Dunn
(Penguin, Penguin Random House)The Twisted
Chain by Jason Gurney
(Ngāpuhi) (Otago University
Press)*The Unsettled:
Small Stories of Colonisation by
Richard Shaw (Massey University
Press)Unreel: A Life in
Review by Diana Wichtel
(Penguin, Penguin Random House) This year the
General Non-Fiction judges have longlisted 13 titles, a
discretionary allowance that reflects the greater number of
entries and range of genres in this
category. The 2025 Ockham New Zealand Book
Awards shortlist of 16 titles (four books in each category)
will be announced on 5 March. The winners, including the
four Mātātuhi Foundation Best First Book Awards
recipients, will be announced at a public ceremony on 14 May
during the Auckland Writers Festival. The winner
of the Jann Medlicott Acorn Prize for Fiction will receive
$65,000 in 2025 and each of the other main category winners
will receive $12,000. Each of The Mātātuhi Foundation Best
First Book winners (for fiction, poetry, general non-fiction
and illustrated non-fiction) will be awarded
$3,000.The Jann Medlicott Acorn Prize for Fiction is
judged by novelist, short story writer and creative writing
lecturer Thom Conroy (convenor); bookshop
owner and reviewer Carole Beu; and author,
educator and writing mentor Tania Roxborogh
(Ngāti Porou). They will be joined in deciding the ultimate
winner from their shortlist of four by an international
judge.The judges of the Mary and Peter Biggs Award
for Poetry are poet, critic and writer David
Eggleton (convenor); poet, novelist and short
story writer Elizabeth Smither MNZM; and
writer and editor Jordan Tricklebank
(Ngāti Maniapoto, Ngāti Mahuta).The General
Non-Fiction Award is judged by author, writer and
facilitator Holly Walker (convenor);
author, editor and historical researcher Ross
Calman (Ngāti Toa, Ngāti Raukawa, Ngāi Tahu);
and communications professional, writer and editor
Gilbert Wong.The BookHub Award for
Illustrated Non-Fiction is judged by former Alexander
Turnbull chief librarian and author Chris
Szekely (convenor); arts advocate Jessica
Palalagi; and historian and social history curator
Kirstie Ross. The Ockham New
Zealand Book Awards are supported by Ockham Residential,
Creative New Zealand, the late Jann Medlicott and the Acorn
Foundation, Mary and Peter Biggs CNZM, Booksellers Aotearoa
New Zealand, The Mātātuhi Foundation and the Auckland
Writers
Festival.