This post was originally published on here
Podcast host Joe Rogan set off a wave of online curiosity after openly wondering whether the death of a top MIT scientist could be connected to unsettling ideas about Earth’s magnetic field. Speaking on his show with YouTuber Jay Anderson, Rogan stressed that the death could have been a routine crime, but then posed a provocative hypothetical: “Imagine if they killed him because he’s telling us something big is coming.”That single line travelled quickly across social media. Clips spread, pulling together the scientist’s past lectures, ancient history and long-running theories about catastrophic cycles on Earth. For many listeners, it was less about proof and more about possibility, and about whether modern science sometimes brushes up against ideas people in the distant past feared deeply.
Who was the MIT scientist Joe Rogan was talking about?
The conversation centred on Nuno Loureiro, a highly regarded MIT plasma physicist known for his work on magnetic fields and plasma behaviour. After his death, older lecture clips resurfaced online, especially one in which he calmly explained how Earth’s magnetic field works and why it matters for life on the planet.Rogan did not suggest Loureiro predicted disaster. Instead, he treated Loureiro as an unusually important figure because of the scale of what he studied. Magnetic fields protect the entire planet, and Loureiro worked on the fundamental physics behind them. For Rogan, that alone made the scientist’s work feel consequential enough to spark uneasy questions when he died suddenly.
Why Rogan raised the idea of foul play
Rogan openly acknowledged that Loureiro’s death could have been a robbery and pointed out that violent crime does happen in Massachusetts. But he also suggested another possibility, driven more by instinct than evidence. Loureiro was not a marginal figure. He was a senior academic at one of the world’s most powerful research institutions, working in an area tied to planetary protection, fusion research and long-term human survival.In Rogan’s framing, that combination mattered. A respected scientist explaining how Earth’s protective systems work, at a time when people are already anxious about climate, space weather and global instability, was enough for Rogan to ask whether knowledge itself can sometimes make people uncomfortable.
The idea that caught Rogan’s attention
In the clip discussed on the podcast, Loureiro explains that Earth’s magnetic field is not static. Over very long periods, it weakens, strengthens and occasionally flips, meaning magnetic north and south swap places. He notes that these changes are part of what keeps the field alive, because without constant motion inside the planet, the magnetic shield would eventually fade.Rogan seized on that idea. If the magnetic field is essential for life, and if it changes in ways most people never think about, he wondered aloud whether such changes could ever coincide with upheavals remembered in myth or buried in ancient history.
From magnetic fields to ancient stone walls
The conversation soon moved far beyond physics. Rogan and Anderson began discussing ancient structures, particularly sites like Saqsaywaman in Peru, where enormous stones are fitted together so tightly that the walls can absorb and dissipate earthquake forces.Rogan questioned why ancient builders would invest such effort. Was it simply practical engineering, or were they responding to a belief that the world was prone to massive natural disruptions?
The book that keeps resurfacing
That line of thought led Anderson to mention The Adam and Eve Story, a book by Chan Thomas that claims Earth undergoes periodic, civilisation-ending catastrophes roughly every 12,000 years. The book frequently circulates online because it appears in a CIA Freedom of Information Act archive, a detail Rogan and Anderson found intriguing.On the podcast, the book was not presented as established truth, but as an example of how ideas about repeating global resets have lingered at the edges of mainstream thinking for decades.
A conversation driven by curiosity, not conclusions
By the end of the discussion, Rogan and Anderson had not landed on answers. Instead, they connected modern science, ancient architecture, forgotten books and one unsettling death into a single thread of curiosity.Rogan’s speculation was not framed as an accusation. It was framed as a question about power, knowledge and scale. When someone studies forces that affect the entire planet, Rogan suggested, people naturally start wondering whether that knowledge carries weight far beyond the laboratory.That sense of curiosity, mixed with unease, is what has kept the conversation alive online long after the episode ended.
