This post was originally published on here
We like to think our career choices are rational. We weigh salary against fulfillment, advancement against work-life balance and prestige against passion. But beneath these conscious calculations lies something more fundamental: a set of psychological predispositions that shape how we go about choosing our professional pursuits.
I’ve spent years studying decision-making, and I’ve noticed a pattern. People don’t underperform in their careers because they lack skills or work ethic. They underperform because their interests aren’t aligned with their professional activities. A software engineer climbs into management and feels miserable. A consultant burns out chasing the next promotion. A teacher stays in the classroom for 30 years and wonders “what if…”.
To remedy this potential misalignment, I’ve created a fun, science-inspired Career DNA Test. Go ahead and take it. It may tell you something new about the career path that is best suited for your personality.
The Dimensions Of Career Satisfaction
Traditional career frameworks focus on what you do: your industry, your role, your credentials, your technical skills. But decades of research in vocational and organizational psychology suggest that how you work — and what psychologically sustains you while doing it — matters more than the job title on your résumé.
Here are three psychological dimensions that consistently emerge as predictors of whether people feel fulfilled or disengaged in their work.
1. Your Relationship To Visibility And Recognition
One underappreciated difference between professionals is how they relate to visibility, status and external recognition.
Some people are energized by clear markers of advancement: titles, promotions and public acknowledgment of their contributions. These signals provide motivational fuel. Others experience the same dynamics as draining or even aversive. They derive satisfaction from the intrinsic quality of their work rather than from how visible it is to others.
This distinction isn’t about ego versus humility. It’s about where your motivation comes from.
When people misunderstand this dimension, they often pursue recognition-heavy paths that quietly erode their motivation — or avoid advancement opportunities that would actually energize them.
2. Your Tolerance For Variety Versus Depth
Another core psychological dimension concerns how people engage with novelty and mastery over time.
Some professionals thrive on variety. They enjoy learning new skills, shifting domains and tackling unfamiliar problems. Others find their deepest satisfaction in depth — that is, staying with a single domain long enough to develop genuine expertise and identity around their craft.
This pattern overlaps with well-studied personality traits such as openness to experience, creativity and perseverance. But, it’s more specific in its career implications. It reflects whether your nervous system is calibrated for breadth or for sustained focus.
Again, neither orientation is superior. Problems arise only when people adopt career strategies mismatched to their underlying preference.
3. Working Through People Versus Through Craft
Another dimension involves how results are achieved.
Some individuals are natural orchestrators. They find meaning in building teams, coordinating systems and achieving outcomes by multiplying their efforts through others. Others are makers at heart. They want to write, code, design, research or build. They feel most alive when engaged directly with the work itself.
Crucially, this distinction has little to do with introversion or extroversion. Some highly social people are miserable in management because they miss the craft. Some quiet, introspective individuals thrive in leadership roles because they enjoy the strategic challenge of orchestration.
This helps explain why so many capable professionals feel an unexpected sense of loss after “moving up.”
Why Traditional Career Advice Falls Short
All too often, career advice rests on an unspoken assumption: that everyone wants roughly the same thing. Climb the ladder. Expand your influence. Increase your compensation. Manage more people.
But this advice reflects the values of a narrow psychological profile. It works exceptionally well for people who are energized by visibility, variety and orchestration — but poorly for everyone else.
Psychological theories, such as the Self-Concordance Model, affirms that career satisfaction emerges not from following a universal script, but from aligning work environments to your core motivational needs. The problem is that these differences are often invisible, even to the people experiencing them. Cultural narratives about success are loud, simple and seductive. Psychological fit, on the other hand, is quiet, complex and easy to overlook.
What This Means for You
Some people are “builders,” driven to scale systems and influence outcomes through others. Some are “artisans,” who want stability and autonomy to perfect a craft. Some thrive in high-impact, high-visibility bursts.
Understanding these patterns can help people make better career decisions going forward.
If you’ve ever felt like you were doing everything right but something still felt off, that discomfort was not a personal failure. It was a signal of psychological misalignment. Research consistently shows that long-term career satisfaction isn’t about maximizing prestige or income. It’s about aligning daily work with the way you are wired to find meaning, motivation and energy.
Once that wiring becomes visible, career decisions stop feeling mysterious. They start feeling navigable.
Curious to know your “Career DNA?” Take my career typing test for an instant answer.
