This post was originally published on here
A single trapped atom has now turned Einstein’s long-imagined moving-slit experiment into a physical reality, closing a nearly century-old gap in the debate over quantum mechanics.
By carefully adjusting how strongly the atom was kicked when a photon struck it, physicists isolated the role of recoil.
They showed exactly when interference survived and when it vanished, directly confronting the conflict Einstein raised against the foundations of quantum theory.
Recreating a 1927 proposal
Niels Bohr, a Danish physicist and one of the founders of quantum mechanics, argued that nature forbids observing both a particle’s path and its wave pattern at the same time.
To test that claim directly, researchers placed a single rubidium atom inside a tightly focused laser trap. The trapped atom acted as the movable slit Einstein proposed in 1927.
Tracking the atom’s recoil, Professor Jian-Wei Pan at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) demonstrated that interference visibility rose and fell in step with how clearly the atom’s kick revealed a photon’s path.
Whenever the recoil stood out against the atom’s own motion, the striped pattern disappeared, and when quantum uncertainty masked that kick, the stripes returned.
That precisely tuned tradeoff captures the dilemma Einstein posed and Bohr defended, showing how quantum limits determine what can and cannot be known at the same time.
Einstein’s original riddle
In 1927, Einstein argued that a movable slit could reveal a photon’s path without erasing the stripe pattern.
Bohr countered with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, a limit that ties position certainty to momentum blur.
Measure the recoil precisely, and the slit must become fuzzy in position, so its two paths stop lining up.
That tradeoff set the terms for every later test of wave-like and particle-like behavior in light.
Why stripes form
Fire photons one at a time through two openings, and their hits still add up into alternating bright and dark bands.
A classic chapter in the Feynman Lectures framed that result as interference, a stripe pattern from waves combining and canceling.
Once the path of each photon is identified, the bands vanish, reflecting complementarity – the rule that wave and particle traits exclude each other.
Richard Feynman, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist at the California Institute of Technology, emphasized how central the phenomenon is to quantum theory.
“We choose to examine a phenomenon which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics,” said Feynman.
Trapping a single atom
To build a moving slit that barely weighs anything, the team held one rubidium-87 atom in a laser trap.
Physicists call that kind of grip optical tweezers, a focused laser trap that holds tiny objects steady.
After cooling the atom to its lowest motion, the USTC team made recoil the only record the photon left behind.
Because the atom scattered the light without keeping it, the outgoing photon could still take two paths and meet again.
Dialing recoil strength
Adjusting how firmly the atom was held changed how clearly it reacted when light struck it.
When the atom was held more loosely, the tiny kick from each photon became easier to detect.
That clearer kick revealed which route the photon had taken, and the interference pattern disappeared.
When the atom was held more tightly, its natural quantum blur masked the kick, hiding the path and allowing the pattern to remain visible.
Entanglement steals contrast
Once recoil carried path clues, the photon and atom stopped acting independently and began sharing a single joint outcome.
Physicists call that linkage entanglement, a bond where two quantum objects share one outcome in step.
Different recoil directions left the atom in different motion states, so the two photon paths overlapped less.
That visibility change matched the expected limit from Heisenberg’s rule, without extra internal states leaking information.
Noise becomes classical
Even in a carefully controlled experiment, tiny unwanted vibrations and heating can blur what the recoil alone would reveal.
By separating heating effects from the recoil signal, the team tracked when random motion started to dominate the atom.
Classical heating drove decoherence, loss of delicate quantum overlap from outside noise, and it did so without adding path knowledge.
Past that point, the experiment moved into a familiar classical regime where extra jitter, not quantum limits, set the contrast.
Earlier attempts at Einstein’s moving slit often relied on bulky objects, extra internal states, or processes that destroyed the incoming light.
Here, a single atom acted as a nearly ideal beam splitter, so the only new information came from momentum recoil.
That design kept the interferometer, a device that compares two wave paths, close to Einstein’s original sketch.
Such a clean build did not rewrite quantum theory, but it closed a long-standing gap between idea and hardware.
Scaling the idea
Future versions could track the atom’s motion more closely, instead of relying only on how bright or faint the final stripes appear.
Researchers could also try using heavier objects as the moving slit, testing how long quantum behavior survives as systems grow larger.
Tighter control over tiny kicks and background disturbances may improve sensitive measurement tools that depend on stable interference patterns.
Moving beyond a single atom will be challenging, because larger objects are much harder to shield from outside disturbances that wash out delicate quantum effects.
From debate to data
A century-old argument now has an experiment that shows exactly how recoil steals or restores the striped signal.
As labs push similar control into larger systems, the same logic will guide quantum technologies and expose where classical behavior takes over.
The study is published in Physical Review Letters.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–
