Section 31 Is Star Trek’s Answer To A Popular Comic Book Movie

Jan Thijs/Paramount+

Set phasers to spoilers: This article discusses major plot details from “Star Trek: Section 31.”
In many ways, “Star Trek” and its universe full of aliens, super-powered beings, the occasional godlike entity (see: Q), and heroic Starfleet officers meant to embody our highest ideals and aspirations isn’t too dissimilar from the high-flying world of comic books and superheroes — but “Section 31” puts a unique yet unmistakable spin on that entire notion. Director Olatunde Osunsanmi and writer Craig Sweeny (alongside Bo Yeon Kim and Erika Lippoldt, both of whom get “Story by” credit) boldly take the franchise where it has only sporadically gone before, centering the story on the devious Emperor Philippa Georgiou (Michelle Yeoh) and a spec-ops team of antiheroes brought together by the dark side of Starfleet that few even know exists. With the Federation’s comforting rules and regulations merely a distant speck in the emptiness of space, “Section 31” truly gets down and dirty in a far-flung corner of the galaxy. By the time viewers are caught up to speed along with the always-wary Georgiou, the premise of the movie becomes clear … and so does its most obvious superhero antihero counterpart.

“Section 31” puts a quintessentially “Star Trek” twist on comic book movies like “The Suicide Squad” — er, James Gunn’s version as opposed to the disastrous 2016 movie, if that helps. A team of misfits and outcasts assembled together to recruit an outright villain, an irreverent tone and snarky sense of humor dialed up to 11, tons of action with multiple brutal deaths, and curse words flying just as often as phaser blasts? The only piece missing from this puzzle is Michelle Yeoh breaking the fourth wall and asking, “What are we, some kind of Section 31?” (Sorry, sorry, I’m trying to delete that.) Regardless of whether the project’s B-movie charms work for Trekkies or not, one thing’s absolutely certain: “Section 31” marks the latest instance of “Star Trek” breaking bad.

Meet the Section 31 team, Star Trek’s answer to Suicide Squad

Michael Gibson/Paramount+

When it comes to the “Star Trek” franchise, being bad has rarely looked so good. Philippa Georgiou (or, rather, her Mirror Universe counterpart who stuck around for almost the entirety of “Star Trek: Discovery”) has always marched to the beat of her own drum, but never has she been let off the chain as much as she is in “Section 31.” Fully escaped from Starfleet’s tight grip, this version of Georgiou is much more extravagant, self-assured, and downright fun than we’ve ever seen her before. Okay, yeah, she’s grappling with the guilt and trauma of condemning her former adolescent flame San (James Hiroyuki Liao) to a life of servitude and torture in order to become Emperor in the first place … but she just looks so fabulous while doing so.

That’s where the rest of this “Suicide Squad”-like team comes in. Georgiou’s past has come back to haunt her in the form of San and his desire to unleash the Emperor’s universe-destroying “Godsend” device, but luckily there’s a full-fledged team of renegades making sure that never happens. Each member falls into narrative roles that easily fit the folks-on-a-mission template: Alok Sahar (Omari Hardwick) is the cool and calm leader, Kacey Rohl’s Rachel Garrett is the prim and proper stickler for rules, the fearsome mech Zeph (Rob Kazinsky) is the brawn, tech-savvy Fuzz (Sven Ruygrok) is the obnoxious brains, Melle (Humberly González) is the femme fatale, and the shapeshifter Quasi (Sam Richardson) is the jack of all trades.

What separates “Section 31” from your typical ensemble fare, however, is the fact that few of them get along with each other, most of them refuse to play by the rules, and every one of them has their own agendas and secrets. Sure, there’s no exact equivalent to Ratcatcher or Polka Dot Man or the kaiju Starro … but they all end up serving awfully similar functions anyway. Whether this approach works for the fanbase or not, well, that’s another story entirely.

Is Section 31 for Trekkies or for action junkies and superhero nerds?

Jan Thijs/Paramount+

Here’s the question of the day, to the extent that /Film’s Jacob Hall centered his positive “Section 31” review on the idea of what actually makes “Star Trek,” well, “Star Trek” in the year of our Lord 2025. To this point, the sci-fi property has never allowed itself to get stuck with just one label and confined to a suffocating box. “The Original Series” alone proved just how malleable this material could be, bouncing from genre to genre in the span of a few episodes faster than the USS Enterprise could warp through space. Since then, every subsequent addition to the canon has only challenged our preconceived notions of what “Trek” can be more and more, from “The Next Generation” daring to jump forward to a time period (mostly) without any familiar faces to “Deep Space Nine” having the audacity to be set on a stationary space station instead of a starship — and, in that regard, “Section 31” is certainly no exception.

Still, it’s easy to see how different “Section 31” feels right from the jump. In a recent interview, “Star Trek” creative lead Alex Kurtzman explained that the TV movie was meant to appeal to as broad an audience as possible … and not just hardcore Trekkies. That goes a long way towards explaining the emphasis on action for the adrenaline junkies out there, the far more irreverent tone, the attempt to create a sense of a “cool factor” (which many critics have argued feels anathema to what “Trek” is at its heart), and the overall parallels to multiple comic book movies in recent vintage.
Ultimately, this “Section 31” experiment likely won’t end up redefining the franchise to as much of an extent as dissenters may fear. For one brief moment, however, we were given a glimpse into the most interesting of mirror universes — one where “Trek” let its hair down, strapped on a cocktail dress and a Beretta (or whatever the phaser equivalent would be), and shot first and asked questions later at the first sign of trouble. It’s hard to deny that it felt anything less than exhilarating.

“Star Trek: Section 31” is currently streaming on Paramount+.

Why Harry Potter’s Vincent Crabbe Actor Was Cut From The Movies

Warner Bros.

When Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) first arrived at Hogwarts School for Witchcraft and Wizardry in “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” (2001), he learned pretty quickly that there were cliques, just like in a regular British boarding school. Notably, he met the sour-tempered Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton), very clearly one of Hogwarts’ aspiring bullies. Draco mocked the timid Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), immediately alienating Harry. Throughout the following films in the “Harry Potter” series, Draco would become worse and worse, moving from mere bullying to becoming a soldier for the evil Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes), who fought against the notion of allowing “tainted blood” into the world’s wizard schools.

For most of the “Harry Potter” films, Draco was joined by a pair of sniveling sidekicks named Crabbe and Goyle. The shorter Crabbe was played by Jamie Waylett, and the taller Goyle was played by Josh Herdman. Crabbe and Goyle were always causing small headaches for Harry, Ron, and Hermione (Emma Watson), and served as low-key villains for the bulk of the series. Crabbe, however, only appeared in the first six of the movies and was mysteriously absent from “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows” Parts I and II. Goyle, meanwhile, remained.
As it so happens, the character was cut because of a real-life incident with actor Jamie Waylett. It seems that in 2009 when the actor was 20, he was pulled over by the police who found a great deal of weed in his car. The cops went back to his place to investigate and found that he was operating his own small weed farm. Growing marijuana was still highly illegal at the time, and Waylett was sentenced to community service. This was all after a 2006 incident, back when Waylett was still a teen when he was accused of using cocaine. The two incidents paired led to Waylett being cut from the final two “Harry Potter” movies. The weed incident was covered by the London Paper.

Actor Jamie Waylett was arrested for drugs, and then later, for taking part in the 2011 London riots

Warner Bros.

It hardly seems fair, but I suppose Warner Bros. — which distributed the Harry Potter movies — wanted to keep the stigma of Waylett’s drug entanglements out of the public eye. The films were already skewing more adult, with some of them being rated PG-13, and featuring multiple murders, but Waylett may have been too much of a liability. The filmmakers, rather than recast the role of Crabbe, simply dropped the character altogether. Goyle returned without his compatriot. 

That wasn’t the end of Waylett’s legal problems either. In 2011, the actor participated in the notorious London riots that sprung up after the police shot and killed a man named Mark Duggan. It seems that Waylett, in protest, took to the streets. He was captured on camera holding an unlit Molotov cocktail. He was arrested and sentenced in the British courts, a case that was covered by the BBC in 2012. He didn’t do any property damage, but his participation was enough to land him in prison. He was sentenced to two years. 
Waylett’s acting career consists only of Harry Potter projects. His only six movies were Harry Potter movies, and he played Crabbe in two “Harry Potter” video games. He also appeared on several talk shows … to talk about Harry Potter. It seems that the actor’s legal troubles have, at least to date, stymied his professional screen career. In 2023, the Mirror caught up with Waylett, and he said he’s not seeking any more acting gigs and was happy to be hired for personalized videos on Cameo. His last movie was “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.” Although out of the game, he still feels he is, in his words, a “Slytherin for life.”

The other Harry Potter actors

Warner Bros.

The fate of Crabbe, as he appeared in the Harry Potter novels, is less rosy than that of Waylett’s. In the books, Crabbe, being a flunky of Draco Malfoy, also became a dark wizard, looking into forbidden killing spells. In one bleak scene, Crabbe tried to use one of said killing spells, but botched its casting, accidentally killing himself. Perhaps ironically, the spell — a fire-based spell — burned so hot that it destroyed one of the Horcruxes, a magical trinket that held a piece of Lord Voldemort’s soul. When a Horcrux is destroyed, Voldemort dies a little more. Waylett didn’t get a death scene, but Crabbe, by Potter canon, didn’t have a dignified death. 

As for Josh Herdman, who played Goyle, he has continued to act, finding a lot of work on British television. He was in eight episodes of “Marcella,” and, more recently, in two episodes of the “Star Wars” series “Andor.” In film, Herdman has appeared in several British productions and had a small part in the 2018 “Robin Hood” film with Taron Egerton. Tom Felton, meanwhile, has been starring in production on stage at London’s West End theater and has enjoyed a prolific career in film and TV. He has been in Shakespeare-adjacent films like “Ophelia” and light fantasies like “A BAbysitter’s Guide to Monster Hunting.” 
Most of the kids from the Harry Potter movies have admirably continued to hone their craft and continue to work in interesting productions. Waylett, meanwhile, seems okay to be out of the game. 

Michael Keaton & Arnold Schwarzenegger Both Rejected This Video Game Movie Flop

Hollywood Pictures

In 1993, “Super Mario Bros.” became the first live-action feature film to be based on a video game. It didn’t go well. Budgeted at somewhere just south of $50 million, “Super Mario Bros.” grossed a meager $20 million in the United States and performed poorly overseas. Its failure was essentially a fait accompli given the behind-the-scenes turmoil that found directors Annabel Jankel and Rocky Morton briefly getting locked out of the editing room, but the film itself was the kind of Hollywood debacle that was too weird to disregard. The production design was striking, the creature effects inventive, and the casting utterly bizarre. Bob Hoskins as Mario facing off against Dennis Hopper as King Koopa? This might not seem outré today, but at the time it was bizarre to see respected actors seemingly slumming in what many considered to be a glorified piece of advertising.

As a fervent gamer at the time, I found it odd. Yes, I was obsessed with beating “Sonic the Hedgehog 2” on my Sega Genesis, but, as a theater major in my freshman year of college, I never once paused to think how awesome it would be to watch a movie of Sonic and Tails collecting rings for two hours. The same held true for Nintendo’s Mario-verse. In theory, I could see how rescuing Princess Peach could be grist for a narrative feature, but I didn’t play the game for the story. I played it for the thrill of beating the game. (And not doing classwork.)
My tune would’ve changed had Jeffrey Katzenberg kicked down my dorm room door and thrown $1 million on my unmade bed while I was busy whipping some fool on EA’s “NHLPA Hockey ’93.” For that money, I would’ve treated “Super Mario Bros.” like it was “War and Peace.” But if I didn’t need the money, why would I bother? Evidently, some of Hollywood’s biggest actors were thinking the same thing when they were offered millions of dollars to actually star in the movie.

The Terminator and Batman wanted no part of Super Mario Bros.

Hollywood Pictures

According to a 1992 Los Angeles Times postmortem on the bombing of “Super Mario Bros.,” Disney had a wildly ambitious wish list throughout the development of the film. Early on, it zeroed in on Danny DeVito to play Mario, and tried to sweeten the deal by offering him the director’s chair. He declined. At one point, Tom Hanks became attached to play Luigi, but the studio moved on after the star hit some serious box office turbulence in 1990 with “Joe Versus the Volcano” and “Bonfire of the Vanities” (which, judging from their production dates, likely freed Hanks up to appear in “Sleepless in Seattle”).

The studio aimed just as high when it came to the part of Koopa. They approached none other than Arnold Schwarzenegger to play Mario and Luigi’s archenemy, who at the time had just starred in the groundbreaking action/sci-fi blockbuster “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.” The Austrian Oak passed, though it’s hard to say he chose wisely by opting for John McTiernan’s muddled flop “Last Action Hero” (which took some of the 1993 box office heat off “Super Mario Bros.” as far as entertainment industry reporting was concerned). Disney also checked in on Michael Keaton’s availability, but the “Batman” and “Batman Returns” star wasn’t looking to go franchise double-dipping.
Casting any of the aforementioned stars (especially Schwarzenegger and Keaton in that moment) in “Super Mario Bros.” probably would’ve kicked the production budget up by $15 million to $20 million, thus making the film a flop for the ages. Instead, it’s an oddly-cast curiosity, a cinematic mutt so hobbled you want to fight for it.

15 Best Thriller Movies On Netflix

Static Media

The thriller is a broad, often unpredictable genre, each film within it largely defined by a litany of subgenres and genre mash-ups. But whether taking viewers into the far reaches of the future, the unfamiliar throes of eras past, or the depths of a criminal underworld that exists in our present society, what unifies this vast and widely varied category of films is their singular ability to make our hearts race from opening to closing credits.

As far as streaming services go, Netflix has some of the best thrillers available to stream — in part because they produce a fair amount of them themselves. We’ve combed through their offerings to share with you the 15 best thriller films on their platform, if for no other reason than to alleviate your analysis paralysis and send your movie night on the road to excitement.

El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie

Netflix

Set after the final episode of the landmark AMC crime drama “Breaking Bad,” Netflix and Sony Pictures’ “El Camino” is a tight and well-executed follow-up that provides one last thrill ride for one of television’s most iconic characters. Aaron Paul reprises his career-defining role as drug dealer Jesse Pinkman. The script picks up right where the series finale ends, with Jesse racing away triumphant yet profoundly traumatized from the white nationalist compound where he was tortured and forced to cook meth for months.

The first idea for the spin-off came to writer-director Vince Gilligan as he was finishing the finale’s script, unable to stop himself from wondering whether or not Jesse could realistically maintain his freedom. Shifting between past and present, viewers see him attempt to navigate what remains of this criminal underworld on his own, as well as poignant flashbacks that reveal the full extent of his torment at the hands of Todd Alquist (Jesse Plemons). Though “Bad” fans shouldn’t go in expecting Gilligan to upend the series’ status quo, everyone can rest assured that “El Camino’s” self-contained odyssey is worthy of all that came before.

The Hateful Eight

The Weinstein Company

Appropriately the eighth film by auteur Quentin Tarantino, it’s something of a miracle that “The Hateful Eight” exists at all. In addition to battling harsh winter conditions on the set of the snow-covered period western, he nearly canceled “The Hateful Eight” entirely after a script for the film was leaked online. He pushed forward, creating one of his most distinct and, at the time, controversial films of his career.

The ensemble cast is anchored by regular Tarantino-collaborator Samuel L. Jackson, playing a Civil War veteran-turned-bounty hunter who is forced to wait out a blizzard in a claustrophobic cabin filled with unpredictable and unsettling delinquents of varying morality. Following “Django Unchained,” Tarantino provocatively chose to again confront racism through a western, a choice which he felt was a natural part of the genre. “When you’re making a western, you can’t help dealing with the American zeitgeist,” he told Time Out. “Ten or 20 years from now, hopefully you’ll be able to look at ‘The Hateful Eight’ and get a good picture of the concerns of America at this time.”

The Killer (2023)

Netflix

With slick direction by genre master David Fincher and a deadly effective performance from Michael Fassbender at the forefront, “The Killer” is an off-beat but arresting assassin thriller. Fassbender plays a hilariously banal hitman whose meticulous nature is upset by a rare mistake. In our spoiler-heavy in-depth analysis of “The Killer” and its ending, we characterized it as something of a response to the radical individualism of Fincher’s “Fight Club” — a violent ode to finding peace within one’s system.

“The Killer” sees Fincher reunite with “Se7en” screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker, who adapted the story from a French graphic novel by Alexis Nolent (known professionally as “Matz) and Luc Jacamon. Fifteen years of development hell and Walker’s own reluctance to participate nearly jeopardized its future, but “The Killer” nonetheless arrived as a satisfying streaming title in 2023.

The Platform

Netflix

Known in Spain as “El Hoyo,” 2019’s “The Platform” is an admittedly upsetting thriller that nonetheless will have you on the edge of your seat from start to finish. Director Galder Gaztelu-Urrutia is unapologetic in his depiction of a futuristic dystopia where vulnerable people fight for survival in what is essentially a vertical jail built around an elevator platform. At the beginning of each day, the platform starts at the top of the tower, filled with a limited amount of food. Those inside are then placed on a random level, relying on the charity of those above them — as well as their own instincts — to survive.

In a 2020 interview with Collider, Gaztelu-Urrutia shared that he was surprised by how well “The Platform” was resonating with audiences around the globe, specifically on a thematic level, despite its abstract presentation. “Inequalities occur everywhere in one way or another,” he opined. “If on that platform, instead of food, we would have placed medicines, the film would have been understood in a similar way.” Though “The Platform” isn’t a pleasant watch by any means, its searing commentary and twisted narrative provoke the mind long after the credits roll.

Emily the Criminal

Roadside Attractions

“Emily the Criminal” didn’t cause much of a fuss when it was released in 2022, but this grounded and surprisingly relatable crime thriller is as underrated as they come. “Parks and Recreation” alum Aubrey Plaza stars as Emily, a debt-ridden intern who becomes involved in a ring of dangerous fraudsters.

Plaza knew from the moment she finished reading the script that Emily was the perfect role for her, and even dedicated part of her preparatory work toward learning exactly how credit card fraud worked. Writer-director John Patton Ford created the character as a sort of personal folk hero during a time in his life when he was “broke, in debt, [and] working crappy jobs.” Speaking to the British Film Institute, he further characterized “Emily the Criminal” as an indictment of America’s lack of affordable education and its reliance on under or unpaid labor in the form of internships. In May of 2024, a television adaptation was announced with Plaza and Ford producing.

Gerald’s Game

Netflix

From Mike Flanagan and his longtime writing partner Jeff Howard, “Gerald’s Game” is a horror-tinged thriller so precise in its execution that it borders on panic-inducing — weirdly, in a good way. The 2017 film adapts the Stephen King novel of the same name, though Flanagan and Howard have bolstered the inventive tale with a few modern updates and with their own superb character-writing.

Carla Gugino stars as Jesse, a woman left handcuffed to a bed in a secluded lake house after her husband (Bruce Greenwood) has a heart attack during sex. As Flanagan told us in an interview, one of the most difficult parts of adapting this story was translating Jesse’s inner monologue to on-screen action, which the writers accomplished by allowing her vivid, stress-induced hallucinations she could converse honestly with. “…[S]he’s really just talking to herself,” Howard shared in his own interview. “She’s exploring the darkest parts of her mind to figure out how to find the answer to survive.”

A Simple Favor

Based on Darcey Bell’s relentless crime novel, “A Simple Favor” shot to the top of Netflix’s most-watched list last summer — and for good reason. Directed by Paul Feig and starring Anna Kendrick and Blake Lively, it takes viewers through a wild and darkly comic mystery that’s nearly impossible to predict. It’s arguably Feig’s most stylized movie to date, flaunting a number of influences including Alfred Hitchcock. “I had been wanting to do a Hitchcockian thriller,” he told Screen Rant, “but it’s never been a genre I felt I could write… [Bell’s screenplay] was dark and had all these great thriller elements to it, but also had room for black comedy.”

He was particularly inspired by Kendrick’s Stephanie. Awkward and out of her element, she’s the sort of figure that appears throughout his filmography, but the setting of this story gave him a chance to explore a familiar journey in a “more adult” way. Despite unfounded rumors of an on-set feud involving Lively and Kendrick, a Feig-led sequel starring the two is on the way and expected to release in 2025.

The Good Shepherd

Universal Pictures

In the same year he co-led the Martin Scorsese crime thriller “The Departed,” Matt Damon took on the equally challenging role of a CIA officer in the Robert De Niro-directed spy thriller “The Good Shepherd.” A passion project of the “Goodfellas” star that spent nearly a decade in development, it imagines (with the aid of historical fact and educated extrapolation) the early days of the government organization through the eyes of one of its core members.

Writer Eric Roth was initially concerned that diving head first into esoteric American lore would alienate some viewers, hoping that the drama between characters would give audiences something to universally latch on to. Though its approach to history may frustrate those who feel it doesn’t line up with what they’ve personally learned about the CIA’s unknowable inner-workings, “The Good Shepherd” is a uniquely engrossing watch that will leave you wondering about the true nature of one of America’s most powerful institutions.

Burning

CGV Arthouse

Starring “The Walking Dead” and “Invincible'” star Steven Yeun alongside Yoo Ah-in, “Burning” is a South Korean mystery thriller ablaze with career-best performances, eerily realistic characters, and fascinating psychological storytelling that refuses to let audiences go for even a second. It follows a struggling writer (Yoo) as he is drawn into the world of the darkly enigmatic and wealthy interloper Ben (Yeun). “Burning” is directed by Lee Chang-dong, a prolific and acclaimed South Korean filmmaker whose work includes the 2000s films “Oasis” and “Secret Sunshine.”

After nearly a decade away from the director’s chair, however, he returned to find himself somewhat out-of-step with modern cinematic trends — a quirk he turned into “Burning’s” most haunting feature. “To me it seems that films these days are becoming more and more simple, and the audience seems to desire simpler stories,” he told The Hollywood Reporter. “…[S]o I kind of wanted to go against this trend and see if a film can sort of throw endless questions at the audience. Endless questions about a larger mysterious world.” Equal parts destructive and revealing, “Burning” is an unmistakable masterpiece that demands your attention.

Bird Box

Netflix

If you have yet to experience Netflix’s viral survival horror thriller “Bird Box,” it should probably be at the top of your watch list. The crowd-pleasing apocalyptic feature follows Sandra Bullock as a woman whose world is invaded by creatures that compel all who witness them to immediate, horrifically hypnotic deaths. As such, she and her fellow survivors are forced to combat and evade them while constantly wearing blindfolds.

Though Bullock plays a maternal figure in the film, director Susanne Bier told Polygon that the script’s unconventional approach to this characterization interested her. “There was something really compelling about her playing that sort of woman who is not particularly accessible,” she said. “She’s brutal, she’s harsh, she doesn’t talk nicely to the kids, but she wants [them] to survive at any price…” 
With this unique perspective, a stacked ensemble cast, and a seemingly endless supply of memorable scenes and dramatic concepts, “Bird Box” is a blockbuster thriller available at the click of the button. You just might want to hide your eyes from its lackluster Barcelona-based sequel.

I Don’t Feel At Home in the World Anymore

Though you might know him for his roles in “The Florida Project,” “I Care Alot” and “Oppenheimer,” Macon Blair made his directorial debut in 2017 with the crime dramedy “I Don’t Feel At Home in the World Anymore.” Starring Melanie Lynskey and Elijah Wood, it follows two neighbors who take the law into their own hands after local police refuse to help with a minor robbery. It’s a pleasantly small-stakes tale that derives impressive tension and humor from how odd and accessible its characters are.

Blair wanted to make a film within the crime genre for his debut, but didn’t feel drawn to the traditional kinds of characters who populate them. Instead, he infused his heroes and villains with quirks that would make them both empathetic and, ideally, funny. The end result is a strangely comforting mystery with just enough bite to sell you on its premise and keep you guessing where it might go next.

Sea of Love

Universal Pictures

If you’re in the mood for a more classic thriller, look no further than 1989’s “Sea of Love.” The Harold Becker film marked Al Pacino’s return to acting after a hiatus following the abysmal reaction and box-office failure of 1985’s “Revolution.”

Despite his stated lack of enthusiasm, Pacino is on the money as the emotionally jaded homicide detective Frank Keller. With his partner (John Goodman), he must track down a cold blooded serial killer targeting single men looking for love in newspaper personal ads. As dark as this sounds, Becker skillfully bends genre conventions by emphasizing the budding love story between Frank and the emotionally distant Helen Cruger (Ellen Barkin). Pacino has expressed that the key to making the story work was to imbue the love story between Keller and Cruger with an equal or greater weight, giving the thriller a solid emotional purpose as well. “Sea of Love” remains a classic, with Pacino, Goodman, and Barkin delivering simple yet effective performances.

A Walk Among the Tombstones

Universal Pictures

Written and directed by future “Logan” scribe Scott Frank, “A Walk Among the Tombstones” is a brooding neo-noir that easily ranks among the best old man action movies Liam Neeson has signed on to. A large part of “Tombstones'” appeal is its cast. After starring in the hit revenge flick “Taken,” Neeson’s involvement alone was enough to get “Tombstones” greenlit studio executives skeptical of contained adult dramas.

Frank has speculated that Neeson was drawn to the project because of his character’s the moral complexity, which harkens back to the grounded crime films of the ’70s. The director also cast Dan Stevens in one of his earliest major roles as an unusual drug trafficker, explaining the unconventional but genius choice as being driven by the character’s need to be both traditionally off-putting as well as surprisingly enlightened. Rounded out by David Harbour and Boyd Holbrook, “Tombstones” renders an impressive cadre of rough characters, creating a narrative web packed with intensity.

All Good Things

Magnolia Pictures

Though “All Good Things” is far from critically acclaimed, it’s well worth watching for two reasons. First, it features a rare but gripping sort of performance from Ryan Gosling, who plays a deeply disturbed real estate heir based on the late convicted murderer Robert Durst. Second, the film itself played several roles in finally bringing Durst to justice.

As director and acclaimed documentarian Andrew Jarecki said at the time, he wanted to make a film Durst could watch and at least appreciate. Watch and appreciate he did. Durst was so enthralled by Jarecki’s work that he agreed to an interview, which became the HBO docuseries “The Jinx.” Infamously, Durst was caught on a hot mic in the first season’s final episode seemingly admitting to the murders. 
Overall, “All Good Things,” with the help of some downright underrated acting from Gosling and Kirsten Dunst, is a eerie and terribly tragic thriller that every Netflix subscriber should watch at least once.

A Prophet

UGC Distribution

After the release of the buzzy but polarizing “Emilia Pérez,” French director Jacques Audiard has earned a slew of new audience members who aren’t quite sure what to make of him as a filmmaker. For those intrigued, we strongly recommend checking out his 2009 thriller “A Prophet,” an angrily defiant film that has only gotten better with age.

Tahar Rahim (another recent victim of viral film failure, thanks to 2024’s “Madame Web”) delivers an unyielding performance as a man who must survive his prison sentence by ingratiating himself to Mafiosos on the inside. Some audiences reacted poorly to his character’s downward moral spiral, which confused Audiard given the universal praise lent to Michael Corleone of “The Godfather.” He wondered to The Guardian if the character’s ethnicity was the cause for discomfort — “Good,” he said of the idea. “I hope it pisses them off. That’s the point.” Indeed, “A Prophet” is a challenging but rewarding film, distilling the complexity, darkness, and edge that makes the thriller genre at large… well, thrilling.

UP geologist represents Southeast Asia at Global Young Scientists Summit 2025

JOHN Dale Dianala from the University of the Philippines Diliman College of Science National Institute of Geological Sciences (UPD-CS NIGS) presented his research on the earthquake potential of faults using satellites in the Global Young Scientists Summit (GYSS) 2025 held at the Stephen Riady Centre, National University of Singapore, on Jan. 6 to 10.Organized by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore, GYSS brings together Nobel laureates and top scientists from around the world to discuss how scientific research and innovation can address emerging global issues.

Register to read this story and more for free.
Signing up for an account helps us improve your browsing experience.
Continue
OR
See our subscription options.

Already have an account? Log in here

When Priyanka Chopra Reacted On The Backlash For Mistaking RRR To Be A Tamil Film: “People Try To Find A Mistake In Anything…”

When Priyanka Chopra Reacted On Mistaking RRR To Be A Tamil Film ( Photo Credit – Instagram )
Priyanka Chopra has been grabbing headlines lately as she is reportedly all set to collaborate with Mahesh Babu in his much-awaited film titled tentatively as SSMB29. The movie will be directed by SS Rajamouli and the latter recently took to his social media handle hinting at the commencement of the shooting of the film. Mahesh and Priyanka’s comment in the post has further fueled these speculations. However, did you know that the actress was once embroiled in a controversy surrounding Rajamouli’s 2022 magnum opus, RRR.

It all began when she mistakenly referred RRR as a Tamil film when it is actually a Telugu film. In Dax Shepard’s podcast, The Armchair Expert, the host was talking about Bollywood wherein he gave the example of RRR. To this, Priyanka Chopra said, “That’s a Tamil movie by the way. It’s like big, mega, blockbuster Tamil which does all of those… it’s like our Avengers.” Well, this led to the actress being heavily criticized because of mistaking RRR to be a Tamil film.

In a throwback interview with Mid-Day, Priyanka Chopra broke her silence on the trolling which she had got because of the same. The Citadel actress stated that she tries to focus on the positive aspects of her life rather than the negative things. She said, “People try to find a mistake in anything I do. I think people enjoy that a little bit. I was a lot more free-spirited, but now, I am a bit more cautious because I have my family to think about. The higher you go in life, the more people look for a reason for you to fall. But at the same time, I have so much love and support from my family, friends and fans. I prefer to focus on that.”

Meanwhile, fans are excited to witness Priyanka Chopra and Mahesh Babu coming together for the SS Rajamouli directorial SSMB29. Apart from this, he actress also has some Hollywood projects lined up. She will be seen in movies like Heads Of State and The Bluff.
Stay tuned to Koimoi for more Bollywood features!
Must Read: When Govinda Arrived At A Shoot Two Days Late: “… He Was Supposed To Come From Srinagar”
Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google News

Mark Wahlberg At The Worldwide Box Office: From Uncharted To Arthur The King, Ranking The Last 5 Films Of The Flight Risk Star!

Mark Wahlberg’s Last 5 Films At The Worldwide Box Office( Photo Credit – Flickr )
American actor Mark Wahlberg is a versatile actor who has worked in different genres of movies. His film Flight Risk opened in the theatres on Friday. The actor has received multiple accolades, and ahead of Flight Risk’s debut weekend, we are here with the last five films at the worldwide box office. Scroll below for the deets.

The actor was formerly known as Marky Mark and was a former rapper. The actor gained fame as part of a hip hop group, Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch member, and his first starring role in Fear. Wahlberg gained praise for his performance in Boogie Nights. He has also appeared in big-budget movies, including Planet of the Apes, The Perfect Storm, and The Italian Job. He was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for playing a police officer in the crime drama The Departed.

According to The Numbers, Mark Wahlberg has appeared in 40 movies as a leading actor based on credits, with a $5.4 billion worldwide aggregate box office. He is best known for movies like Transformers: Age of Extinction and Transformers: The Last Knight. His Flight Risk, directed by Mel Gibson, is headed for a decent debut weekend, despite negative reviews from the critics.

Here are the last five films of Mark Wahlberg at the worldwide box office as per Box Office Mojo’s data

Joe Bell (2020) – $1.73 million
Father Stu (2022) – $21.79 million
Arthur the King (2024) – $40.85 million
Instant Family (2018)- $120.98 million
Uncharted (2022) – $407.14 million

More about Flight Risk
It is an action thriller movie featuring Michelle Dockery and Topher Grace in crucial roles besides Mark Wahlberg. Flight Risk follows a pilot transporting a US Marshal and a government witness across the Alaskan wilderness, where the identities and intentions of those onboard come into question.
The movie collected $4.4 million on Friday when it opened in the theatres. Mark Wahlberg’s film is eyeing a $10 million to $13 million three-day weekend in the United States. Flight Risk was released in the United States on December 24.
Note: Box office numbers are based on estimates and various sources. Numbers have not been independently verified by Koimoi.
Check out the latest Hollywood News!
Must Read: Wicked Worldwide Box Office: Less Than $4M Away From Surpassing Dune 2 As One Of The Top 5 Highest-Grossing Films Of 2024!
Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google News

Scientists baffled after detecting continued ‘chirping’ coming from space

In a groundbreaking discovery, scientists from Beihang University in China have detected a phenomenon typically associated with Earth’s magnetic field 100,000 kilometres (62,000 miles) beyond our planet.This unexpected finding has sparked excitement in the scientific community, raising new questions about the behaviour of electromagnetic waves in space.The discovery came through data analysis collected by NASA’s Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) satellites, designed to study the Earth’s magnetosphere. The scientists identified what are known as ‘chorus waves’—bursts of electromagnetic radiation that travel along Earth’s magnetic field lines.These waves, often called “chirps” due to their distinctive frequency, are usually detected in Earth’s vicinity, but this study marks the first time they’ve been observed at such a great distance.Although the phenomenon is called “chirping”, the sound itself is not audible in space, as there is no air to carry sound waves. The ‘chirps’ result from scientists converting these electromagnetic signals into audio for analysis.Despite their somewhat whimsical name, chorus waves are far from unusual. These waves are commonly found within the Earth’s magnetosphere, where they help accelerate electrons to speeds approaching that of light, contributing to the formation of Earth’s protective radiation belts.These radiation belts are crucial in shielding Earth from harmful high-energy particles emanating from the Sun. At the same time, the energetic electrons that create beautiful auroras like the Northern Lights can also pose a significant threat to space infrastructure. These high-speed electrons are often dubbed “killer electrons” because they have the potential to damage satellites, disrupt communication systems, and pose health risks to astronauts.Typically, chorus waves are observed around 51,000 kilometres (32,000 miles) from Earth, where the magnetic field behaves in a predictable dipole pattern—much like a bar magnet. However, in this study, published in Nature, the chorus waves were detected much farther from Earth, at a remarkable 165,000 kilometres (103,000 miles) away. Earth’s magnetic field is heavily distorted at this distance, with no clear dipolar effect. This is what makes the detection so intriguing.The waves detected at this extreme distance share similar characteristics to those found closer to Earth, with bursts that last about 0.1 seconds and oscillate at about 100 Hz, similar to the rumble of a car engine. This discovery suggests that these waves can form even in regions where Earth’s magnetic field is not functioning in its typical dipolar pattern—challenging previous assumptions that they required the planet’s specific environmental conditions.”The discovery doesn’t rule out the existing theory that chorus waves rely on Earth’s magnetic field,” Professor Richard Horne, head of space weather at the British Antarctic Survey, who was not involved in the study, told BBC Science Focus. “However, it does suggest that scientists need to reassess how these waves function and how they form in regions where the magnetic field deviates significantly from a dipole.”This finding has significant implications for the study of space weather. While chorus waves play a crucial role in protecting Earth from solar storms, they can also contribute to the aforementioned “killer electrons” that damage space infrastructure. Understanding how these waves propagate and behave in different regions of space could improve predictions of solar storms, providing crucial information for safeguarding satellites and communication systems.As space exploration and technology continue to evolve, the most recent discovery highlights the complexity of space weather and its potential impacts. The research opens up new avenues for studying the behaviour of electromagnetic waves beyond Earth’s magnetosphere, offering a deeper understanding of the forces shaping our space environment.In the coming years, scientists will likely continue to study these waves to refine space weather forecasts and better protect technology vital to modern society.

When Salman Khan Decided To Never Work With Raveena Tandon: “We Fought Throughout The Film”

When Raveena Tandon Revealed Salman Khan Once Vowed To Never Work With Her( Photo Credit – Instagram )
Raveena Tandon needs no introduction. She was one of the top heroines of the 90s who appeared in several movies opposite several heroes. The actress started her film journey with Salman Khan in 1991’s Patthar Ke Phool, but the actor once vowed never to work with Raveena, only to share the screen again in Andaz Apna Apna. The KGF Chapter 2 actress once shared an interesting story in an interview.

Patthar Ke Phool was an action film by Anant Balani starring Tandon opposite Khan. The movie also featured Vinod Mehra, Reema Lagoo, Kiran Kumar, and Manohar Singh in crucial roles. Raveena, the daughter of Ravi Tandon, has grown up in the industry and seen how things work in showbiz. Now, her daughter, Rasha Thadani, has made her debut with Azaad opposite Ajay Devgn’s nephew, Aaman Devgan. The film also features Ajay and Diana Penty. It is now running in theatres.

A few years back, Raveena Tandon, in an interview with Pinkvilla, revealed that Salman Khan once vowed never to work with her. She gave insight into her relationship with Salman when they were filming Patthar Ke Phool. She recalled, “We were like two kids in a class who just wanted to fight over everything.”

She explained, “I was 16 and a half, and Salman must have been 23. We were both brats. Salman and I are of the same nature-wise, we were almost brought up in the same house as Salim uncle and my dad used to work together. It was like we were continuing our fights from home.”
Raveena added, “We fought throughout the film and Salman said ‘I’m not going to work with her’, and then we did Andaz Apna Apna.”
Andaz Apna Apna came out in 1994 and has achieved cult status over the years. The action comedy film had an ensemble cast that included Aamir Khan, Salman Khan, Raveena Tandon, Karisma Kapoor, Paresh Rawal, and Shakti Kapoor.
On the professional front, Raveena Tandon reports that Jolly LLB 3 and Welcome to the Jungle are in the pipeline.
For more such throwbacks, stay tuned to Koimoi!
Must Read: When Govinda Arrived At A Shoot Two Days Late: “… He Was Supposed To Come From Srinagar”
Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google News