An Unending Net of Stories: Inside the New Book ‘The Oceans of Cruelty’

On October 30, at 2 p.m. ET, Douglas Penick will discuss his new book, The Oceans of Cruelty, with Tricycle’s editor-in-chief, James Shaheen. Learn more about the book, a thrilling re-creation of an 11th-century Sanskrit collection, below and join us for the virtual discussion. Register here.

The version of the ancient Twenty-Five Tales of a Corpse Spirit, or the Vetala tales, which I’ve retold in The Oceans of Cruelty (The New York Review of Books, October 2024), is from John Platts and Duncan Forbes’s 19th-century version from the old Hindi. This, in turn, is a translation from Śivadasa’s Sanskrit. It came from much earlier collections now lost. These stories have always been very much alive in India; they migrated to Tibet, where they changed and became part of the existing spoken culture. But they changed dramatically in Tibet, Mongolia, and Buryatia, where they evolved to become vehicles for Buddhist teachings. (They made a great impression on Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche, among others.) And as they made it to the West, particularly in German Indologist Heinrich Zimmer’s interpretation, The King and the Corpse, and German writer Thomas Mann’s novella, The Transposed Heads, they became vehicles for psychological explorations in the Western style.
The stories changed a lot in that migration. Most obviously, the great Buddhist teacher Nagarjuna sent a khan, or king, to retrieve the vetala, or corpse spirit, so that the king might be purified of the evil karma resulting from his evil deeds. And many of the tales within this frame are very different too. They’ve certainly been transposed to a different terrain and take place in more nomadic social structures. They have shaped and have been shaped by the innumerable cultures through which they’ve passed. 
We are all always completely enmeshed in an unending net of stories. These extend from the most distant past, the creation, or the big bang, to now. They shape the future too. We find our identity and the identity of our world, our sense of meaning and purpose, in the many narratives we’ve received. The history of the Buddha; the tales of Abraham, Isaac, Mohammed, Confucius, and Lao-tzu; the passion of Christ; and the history of science live in us whether we’re believers or not. Narratives shape the ways in which we seek to understand ourselves, develop ourselves, and free ourselves. This is true even if we try to free ourselves from stories altogether. 
The Oceans of Cruelty contains both aspects: the struggles to find a way to be free inside a given tale, and a larger struggle, the frame story, which presents the longer fight to be free from imprisonment in stories altogether. The beginning and the end, this is the shape of narrative, and just as we therefore can look to the end, narratives take us back to the beginning. For instance, this is how The Oceans of Cruelty starts: 

As has been told: 
Primordial space, the undivided, the signless, where sentience and non-sentience, awareness and unawareness have not divided, where there is neither life nor death, nor time nor stasis, continuity or discontinuity, void or phenomena. Primordial Sea undivided, Primordial Sky undivided, Primordial Darkness undivided, Primordial Light undivided. Chaos moving and alive without reference to order or disorder. Neither noun nor verb. Continuity continuing in its own reference. A vast and empty luminous expanse.
Sounds, words emerge, undivided from the original sea, never separated nor born. Phenomena rippling on the surface of the sea. Rippling as great forces, gods, cycles of time wherein worlds and universes are born, evolve, decay, die, and dissolve. Whispers pass by, not remembered nor forgotten. 
As has been told:
Amongst whispered ripples of the Primordial Sea, ripples flowing one into another, chasing, following, continuing, the whisperings ebbing, from this momentary surface. These continuing now and now and now, merging, and dissolving and re-emerging as form, as Śiva, as Śiva, enfolding, whispering to Pārvatī, as Pārvatī listening, enfolded. Mount Kailash rising, wave-crest moving slowly, at the highest point, the border of solidity, where, amid ceaseless winds, it touches an ever-changing sky, Śiva whispers to the mother of the universe, to Pārvatī, whispers idly, and his whisperings tell fragments of worlds that will come to be, that will seem. Extending long pale arms, Śiva reaches down into the chaos of the lightless sea, draws up his hands and shimmering droplets fall, whispering of moments, stories unconstrained by meanings, shaped from chaos by falling, whispering, caressing as they circle in the whorls of Pārvāti’s inner ear. She sighs, exhales in deeper languor, smiles slightly. They are entwined; they merge and emerge; as he speaks, elements of a broken history of the world appear. (Reprinted with permission from The New York Review of Books.)

And what happens next? Well, in this version of the cycle of the Vetala tales, as Shiva whispers these so seductive stories, a human lover in bed with his wife happens to overhear them. He cannot resist telling them to his wife. Shiva realizes his amorous murmuring has entered the human realm as common entertainment. He curses the human lover with a terrible curse. 
This leads to another story of a king and his successors, and then to a tale about three beings, a corpse spirit, a king, King Vikramaditya, and an evil yogi, all fated to come together. Encompassed in these are other stories, the “24 Tales of a Vetala.”  Some are fragmentary, some quite complicated, many have repeated and overlapping themes; they take place in throne rooms, charnel grounds, jungles, gardens, shrine rooms, and underground caverns. Stories are nested within stories, one set of circumstances is explained by another, in dramas of sudden overwhelming love, terrible grief, of yogis entering new bodies and bringing the dead to life, of faithful guardians and ministers, women with too many fiancés, cruel, murderous husbands, honest thieves, of ritual suicides, of sacrifice, of the power of the Great Goddess to destroy and restore life. Each story contains other stories, so all of these tales are contained within other, nested, narrative frames, extending out from the beginning of time.  
As this cycle unfolds, at the end of every story, King Vikramaditya must answer a question that the vetala poses about the tale. This, as if these narratives were riddles or puzzles about some larger reality. He answers, and then the cycle continues with another story and keeps going until the king cannot think of a reply. Then, the underlying reality of the situation becomes clear. The king and the vetala can free themselves from these hallucinatory repetitions.
But we, readers and listeners all, well, we are not free, nor do we, in our heart of hearts, wish to free ourselves from the stories we read and hear. For us, when one ends, another must begin. This is the core seduction of samsara. So be it.

Banning Books Isn’t Just Morally Wrong. It’s Also Unhealthy

When I was in practice as a pediatrician, I wrote daily prescriptions for reading. I had an actual notepad to help me prescribe books to families of young infants and toddlers. On that pad, I would write things like “read to your baby for 20 minutes,” and along with that prescription I’d give that family an age- and language-appropriate book to read together. I did this because I knew, as pediatricians and family practitioners who continue this practice across the country know, that stories are good medicine.Reading aloud, or being read to, bonds families together—it promotes attachment. Children who are read to produce and understand language better and become better readers later in life. Reading to young children can also help them develop attention, deal with difficult emotions, and control behavior like aggression. But more than that, books help build young people’s imagination—in fact, they help build radical imagination. Think about it: in children’s and YA fiction, mice talk and fight with swords, little girls have big red dogs as best friends, witches and wizards fly on brooms, and young people overthrow corrupt and unjust governments through grit and wit and a belief in themselves and each other. So in a sense, children’s and YA fiction are roadmaps to the future, they are blueprints for tomorrow, because it is in their pages that young people get the tools and the imaginative practice to envision what they want their world to look like. If there’s any time in history that our young people have been in critical need of radical imagination, it’s now. If humans are to deal, as a collective, with everything from religious bigotry to racial injustice to environmental disaster, our future leaders, teachers, artists, and politicians need to imagine radical possibilities for the world. They will need to enact a radical empathy, a radical love toward those both like and unlike themselves.It is partially for this reason that children’s and YA fiction is under such intense assault from book banners. They recognize the power of literature to shape not just individual minds and hearts, butalso the architecture of the future.When I transitioned from the work of pediatric patient care to that of Narrative Medicine, a clinical and scholarly discipline dedicated to honoring the role of story in the healing encounter, I only deepened my understanding of the power of story. Telling your story, and having your story heard, is a fundamentally human act. Yet book banners are attempting to silence the voices of certain communities in order to effectively tell us we don’t have the right to tell our stories, or, perhaps, the right to even exist.As an immigrant daughter who rarely got to see brown girls like me in the stories I was exposed to growing up, there was a part of me that believed, deep down, that maybe I wasn’t worthy of representation; that maybe I couldn’t be a hero, even of my own story. Being deprived of stories about people like those in your own community is not simply unfair or unjust, it is also deeply unhealthy. Narrative erasure is a kind of psychic violence.Book banning is an assault on our individual and collective health—our imaginativehealth, our intellectual health, our physical health, and the health of our society. Luckily, wealready have a cure: fighting for the freedom to read. Stories allow us all to give meaning to the world around us and to envision something better. They have the ability to show us new superheroes, new ways of leadership, new paths to building community, and new ways to love and be loved. They are the building blocks to the future—the tool through which young people will learn how to heal this hurting world. We must ensure young readers have access to the books that will open their minds and fuel their imaginations.Dr. Sayantani DasGupta is a pediatrician and a founder and faculty member of the Master’s Program in Narrative Medicine at Columbia University. She is a founding member of Authors Against Book Bans, and a bestselling author of books for children and young adults.

Undercover film exposing UK far-right activists pulled from London festival

A documentary that lifts the lid on a “race science” network of far-right activists in Britain and its links to a rich American funder of eugenics research has been pulled from the London Film Festival (LFF) at the last minute due to safety concerns.The organisers have taken the “heartbreaking decision” to cancel the planned screening of the “exceptional” Undercover: Exposing the Far Right this weekend due to fears about the welfare of the staff and security working in the festival venues.Havana Marking, the director of the film – which made headlines last week for identifying the backer of research into so-called race science and highlighting the racist views of former London mayoral candidate Nick Scanlon – has criticised the decision to pull the premiere as “a very unfortunate outcome”.“I understand the festival need to look after their staff, but I am furious that our film has lost a planned theatrical release so late in the day,” she said. “We were told the LFF felt they could not show it due to security issues. I do feel, though, that the power of the far right is exaggerated, although their influence is clearly dangerous.”Speaking to the Observer, Marking said she was worried about the climate of fear created by recent far-right riots in Britain in the wake of the killing of three children in Southport.“We did try to put forward alternative ways to show the film, when they came to us,” she said. “But the riots have made people so scared. I am trying to think of it as a reflection of the powerful content of the film, but it is getting harder to make documentaries with political content, and if they are not guaranteed a screening it really does not help.“At least the film will go out on Channel 4 on Monday. And in fact, both Channel 4 and the British Film Institute, the body behind the film festival, have actually been incredibly supportive of this film.”Kristy Matheson, the director of the festival, said the decision to cancel the screening had been due to worries about staff not feeling secure.“After exploring all the viable options to screen this film at a public film festival we took the heartbreaking decision to not present Undercover: Exposing the Far Right at the LFF,” she said. “I think the film is exceptional and easily one of the best documentaries I have seen this year. However, festival workers have the right to feel safe and that their mental health and well being is respected in their workplace.“I took on board the expert opinion of colleagues around the safety and wellbeing risks that the screening could have created for audiences and the team and that informed our decision, which we did not take lightly. The film is incredibly important and we wish it the very best.”The fly-on-the-wall documentary follows investigators from the organisation Hope Not Hate as they track down members of violent and bigoted far-right factions who are planning demonstrations and intimidation campaigns. It also unmasks the British far-right activist and former private school teacher Matthew Frost, also known as Matt Archer, and his connections to the Seattle-based multimillionaire Andrew Conru.skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionMarking said she had filmed with Hope Not Hate for two years. “Of course, the story kept changing, and at the end the riots happened in Britain. At first, we believed this just made the film more relevant. It is true, of course, that far-right activists like Tommy Robinson do pose a threat, particularly to members of Hope Not Hate, but it is sad if their actions have had this impact.”The documentary focuses on the work of the Human Diversity Foundation, a group which uses podcasts, videos, websites and research papers to argue for the genetic superiority of certain ethnic groups. It received more than $1m from Conru, who made his money from dating websites. He has pulled his support following reporting in the Guardian, saying it had deviated from its original mission of “non-partisan academic research”.

Undercover film exposing UK far-right activists pulled from London festival

A documentary that lifts the lid on a “race science” network of far-right activists in Britain and its links to a rich American funder of eugenics research has been pulled from the London Film Festival (LFF) at the last minute due to safety concerns.The organisers have taken the “heartbreaking decision” to cancel the planned screening of the “exceptional” Undercover: Exposing the Far Right this weekend due to fears about the welfare of the staff and security working in the festival venues.Havana Marking, the director of the film – which made headlines last week for identifying the backer of research into so-called race science and highlighting the racist views of former London mayoral candidate Nick Scanlon – has criticised the decision to pull the premiere as “a very unfortunate outcome”.“I understand the festival need to look after their staff, but I am furious that our film has lost a planned theatrical release so late in the day,” she said. “We were told the LFF felt they could not show it due to security issues. I do feel, though, that the power of the far right is exaggerated, although their influence is clearly dangerous.”Speaking to the Observer, Marking said she was worried about the climate of fear created by recent far-right riots in Britain in the wake of the killing of three children in Southport.“We did try to put forward alternative ways to show the film, when they came to us,” she said. “But the riots have made people so scared. I am trying to think of it as a reflection of the powerful content of the film, but it is getting harder to make documentaries with political content, and if they are not guaranteed a screening it really does not help.“At least the film will go out on Channel 4 on Monday. And in fact, both Channel 4 and the British Film Institute, the body behind the film festival, have actually been incredibly supportive of this film.”Kristy Matheson, the director of the festival, said the decision to cancel the screening had been due to worries about staff not feeling secure.“After exploring all the viable options to screen this film at a public film festival we took the heartbreaking decision to not present Undercover: Exposing the Far Right at the LFF,” she said. “I think the film is exceptional and easily one of the best documentaries I have seen this year. However, festival workers have the right to feel safe and that their mental health and well being is respected in their workplace.“I took on board the expert opinion of colleagues around the safety and wellbeing risks that the screening could have created for audiences and the team and that informed our decision, which we did not take lightly. The film is incredibly important and we wish it the very best.”The fly-on-the-wall documentary follows investigators from the organisation Hope Not Hate as they track down members of violent and bigoted far-right factions who are planning demonstrations and intimidation campaigns. It also unmasks the British far-right activist and former private school teacher Matthew Frost, also known as Matt Archer, and his connections to the Seattle-based multimillionaire Andrew Conru.skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionMarking said she had filmed with Hope Not Hate for two years. “Of course, the story kept changing, and at the end the riots happened in Britain. At first, we believed this just made the film more relevant. It is true, of course, that far-right activists like Tommy Robinson do pose a threat, particularly to members of Hope Not Hate, but it is sad if their actions have had this impact.”The documentary focuses on the work of the Human Diversity Foundation, a group which uses podcasts, videos, websites and research papers to argue for the genetic superiority of certain ethnic groups. It received more than $1m from Conru, who made his money from dating websites. He has pulled his support following reporting in the Guardian, saying it had deviated from its original mission of “non-partisan academic research”.

The Horror Film That Frightens Me the Most Is More Gross Than Scary

MoviesThe horror film that frightens me the most is more disgusting than scary. Surprisingly, the flick in question has a big cult following.

Published on October 19, 2024

2 min read

Any seasoned horror fan will start feeling numb to fear. For this reason, the horror film that frightens me the most is more disgusting than scary. Surprisingly, the flick in question has a big cult following.
The horror film that frightens me the most is terrifying for 1 reason only
Blood doesn’t scare me. I could watch the scene from A Nightmare on Elm Street where all of Johnny Depp’s blood splatters all over the ceiling while eating lunch. What creeps me out is seeing organs.
Repo! The Genetic Opera is a rock musical about a dystopia where transplanted organs are repossessed. It grosses me out because it has more organs than any other horror movie. The songs aren’t great, it’s disgusting without being clever, and it’s not scary in the conventional sense. But it forces you to look at human innards for long periods of time, so it was difficult for me to watch.

[embedded content]

Why people like this film that disgusts more than it frightens
Perhaps the strangest thing about Repo! The Genetic Opera is that it has become a cult movie. Why would so many people enjoy it? It doesn’t sound like the sort of project that would inspire a fandom. 
Well, there are probably two reasons. First, there are only so many horror musicals — and most of them aren’t trying to be scary. The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Little Shop of Horrors, and Phantom of the Paradise are meant to be campy first and foremost. Repo! The Genetic Opera fills a need by being a truly horrific song-and-dance movie.
Furthermore, the Goth subculture includes its own subculture called “cybergoth.” It combines old-school Goth looks and music with science fiction and electronica. Repo! The Genetic Opera might be the only movie to capture some element of that scene. It’ll probably have fans until someone manages to make a halfway decent cybergoth movie. All Tim Burton needs to do is direct a good science fiction movie for once in his life.

[embedded content]

The director of ‘Repo! The Genetic Opera’ tried to mimic another horror movie musical
During a 2023 interview with Rue Morgue, director Darren Lynn Bousman discussed what he was thinking when he made Repo! The Genetic Opera. “The defining thing of my career is the ‘What the f***’ factor,” he said. “The art of mine that has been most successful — and for every success, I have ten failures — are the projects I did that caused anyone witnessing them to say, ‘What the f*** is he thinking?’ In retrospect, the biggest successes have been when I had the biggest balls and had nothing to lose.
“Saw II — they didn’t know they had a franchise at that point,” he continued. “There wasn’t the scrutiny that came with subsequent films; it was just, ‘Let this guy who wrote the script do a sequel that may or may not be successful.’ Then Saw II comes out, it’s wildly successful and you have more eyes on it. With Repo!, I wanted to make something weird that spoke to a certain type of individual. I was coming off three sequels, about to do a remake, and I wanted to do something wholly original…. We wanted it to be as edgy as Rocky Horror.”
Well, maybe the filmmakers should have noticed that The Rocky Horror Picture is nice to look at.

The Horror Film That Frightens Me the Most Is More Gross Than Scary

MoviesThe horror film that frightens me the most is more disgusting than scary. Surprisingly, the flick in question has a big cult following.

Published on October 19, 2024

2 min read

Any seasoned horror fan will start feeling numb to fear. For this reason, the horror film that frightens me the most is more disgusting than scary. Surprisingly, the flick in question has a big cult following.
The horror film that frightens me the most is terrifying for 1 reason only
Blood doesn’t scare me. I could watch the scene from A Nightmare on Elm Street where all of Johnny Depp’s blood splatters all over the ceiling while eating lunch. What creeps me out is seeing organs.
Repo! The Genetic Opera is a rock musical about a dystopia where transplanted organs are repossessed. It grosses me out because it has more organs than any other horror movie. The songs aren’t great, it’s disgusting without being clever, and it’s not scary in the conventional sense. But it forces you to look at human innards for long periods of time, so it was difficult for me to watch.

[embedded content]

Why people like this film that disgusts more than it frightens
Perhaps the strangest thing about Repo! The Genetic Opera is that it has become a cult movie. Why would so many people enjoy it? It doesn’t sound like the sort of project that would inspire a fandom. 
Well, there are probably two reasons. First, there are only so many horror musicals — and most of them aren’t trying to be scary. The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Little Shop of Horrors, and Phantom of the Paradise are meant to be campy first and foremost. Repo! The Genetic Opera fills a need by being a truly horrific song-and-dance movie.
Furthermore, the Goth subculture includes its own subculture called “cybergoth.” It combines old-school Goth looks and music with science fiction and electronica. Repo! The Genetic Opera might be the only movie to capture some element of that scene. It’ll probably have fans until someone manages to make a halfway decent cybergoth movie. All Tim Burton needs to do is direct a good science fiction movie for once in his life.

[embedded content]

The director of ‘Repo! The Genetic Opera’ tried to mimic another horror movie musical
During a 2023 interview with Rue Morgue, director Darren Lynn Bousman discussed what he was thinking when he made Repo! The Genetic Opera. “The defining thing of my career is the ‘What the f***’ factor,” he said. “The art of mine that has been most successful — and for every success, I have ten failures — are the projects I did that caused anyone witnessing them to say, ‘What the f*** is he thinking?’ In retrospect, the biggest successes have been when I had the biggest balls and had nothing to lose.
“Saw II — they didn’t know they had a franchise at that point,” he continued. “There wasn’t the scrutiny that came with subsequent films; it was just, ‘Let this guy who wrote the script do a sequel that may or may not be successful.’ Then Saw II comes out, it’s wildly successful and you have more eyes on it. With Repo!, I wanted to make something weird that spoke to a certain type of individual. I was coming off three sequels, about to do a remake, and I wanted to do something wholly original…. We wanted it to be as edgy as Rocky Horror.”
Well, maybe the filmmakers should have noticed that The Rocky Horror Picture is nice to look at.

Scientists discover how to convert trees into sustainable industrial chemicals”

Simplifying…
Inshort

Scientists have used CRISPR genome editing to create poplar trees with modified lignin content, making them easier for bacteria to break down.

The key was not just reducing lignin, but specifically the methoxy content within it.

This breakthrough could lead to sustainable production of industrial chemicals from these engineered trees, once field testing confirms their potential.

Was a long read? Making it simpler…

Next Article

The breakthrough could help reduce our dependence on petroleum-based chemicals

Oct 19, 2024

01:34 pm

What’s the story

In a major breakthrough for sustainable production of industrial chemicals, a team of researchers from North Carolina State University, has found a specific molecular property in lignin that determines how it degrades and converts into useful substances.

The scientists have identified the methoxy content in lignin, which brings us closer to producing industrial chemicals from trees, an eco-friendly alternative to petroleum-derived products.

Bacterial breakdown

The role of bacteria in lignin degradation

Led by Robert Kelly, the research team had previously shown that some thermophilic bacteria could digest the cellulose in trees.

But, the process wasn’t efficient enough for industrial chemical production.

“In other words, not at the level that would make economic and environmental sense for producing industrial chemicals,” Kelly explained.

This prompted further investigation into the molecular properties of lignin.

Genetic modification

CRISPR and lignin: A decade-long research journey

For more than a decade, Kelly has worked with Associate Professor Jack Wang to tackle the high lignin content in trees.

In 2023, Wang’s team employed CRISPR genome editing tech to develop poplar trees, with modified lignin content and composition.

These GM trees were then tested for their suitability for microbial degradation and fermentation, showing that bacteria have different appetites for different types of plants.

Key discovery

Bacterial preferences and lignin methoxy content

In their study, Kelly and Bing used a genetically engineered bacterium to break down Wang’s engineered poplar trees with different lignin contents.

They found that trees with lower lignin methoxy content were more easily degraded.

“This cleared up the mystery of why lower lignin alone is not the key—the devil was in the details,” Kelly said.

“Low methoxy content likely makes the cellulose more available to the bacteria.”

Future prospects

Engineered poplars: A promising resource for industrial chemicals

The engineered poplars with low lignin and methoxy content hold promise for producing chemicals through microbial fermentation.

While these trees have been successfully grown in greenhouses, the results of field testing are still awaited.

If successful, this could pave the way for large-scale production of chemicals from poplar trees using microbes, now that the key marker – methoxy content – has been identified.