PM calls for stronger efforts to foster tourism

Prime Minister Hun Manet Friday asked the Ministry of Tourism (MoT) to increase efforts in promoting Cambodian tourism globally, highlighting that the total number of international tourists in 2024 surpassed pre-Covid-19 levels.Mr Hun Manet made these remarks during a weekly cabinet plenary session at the Peace Palace. According to a press release on the results of the cabinet’s plenary meeting, the Premier highlighted that the total number of international tourists in 2024 surpassed pre-Covid-19 levels, reaching at least 6.7 million.He directed the Ministry of Tourism (MoT) to intensify efforts in promoting Cambodian tourism globally, recognising the sector’s great potential for rapid recovery.Chuk Chumno, Director-General of Tourism Development and International Cooperation of Ministry of Tourism, said in a press conference recently that the ministry has mapped out a roadmap, assessing that the number of international tourists may increase in 2025 or may have to wait until 2026 or 2027 to recover due to the global crisis, the Russia-Ukraine war, as well as increasingly complex geopolitical issues.He said that in fact international visitor numbers in 2024 saw significant growth, with Cambodia welcoming over 6.7 million of international tourists, slightly surpassing the figures from 2019.“There are many factors contributing to the rapid recovery of the tourism sector. However, we acknowledge that our priority markets have not fully recovered. Some tourism markets have only recently bounced back, while others are still lagging behind. Therefore, we must approach this situation with careful consideration,” said Chumno.“For 2025, we aim to attract at least 7.5 million international tourists, and we will do our best to achieve this goal. To reach this target, the Minister has given it careful thought and has already announced his commitment to ensuring that Cambodia avoids a low season. We have to focus on only high season and a green season.”Chumno said that the tourism minister has set a strategy for low season to open the market more widely by organising more important events at major tourist destinations and opening Muslim markets to attract them to Cambodia as well.“With the trends that occurred in 2024 and the efforts of the Minister of Tourism, with the efforts of all the promotion efforts, we believe that our tourist growth will maintain a significant increase, and we remain optimistic for 2025,” he underlined, adding that, “What we can all do is come together to promote tourism, showcase Cambodia’s destinations, and highlight its strengths.At the same time, we will work together to address and resolve any challenges.”Speaking during a dissemination on ‘Tourism Promotion and Anti-Fake News’ held on January 15 at the Ministry of Information, Huot Hak, Minister of Tourism, said that the ministry has set a strategic plan in targeting to attract up to 7.2 million or 7.5 million foreign tourists in 2025.Cambodia welcomed 6.7 million international tourists, an increase of 22.9 percent compared to 2023 and 1.4 percent compared to 2019, the period before the spread of Covid-19.“The ministry will prioritise key tasks, including developing a detailed action plan, ensuring the plan is carried out effectively and responsibly, and continuously monitoring and assessing tourist arrivals, with the ambition to attract more foreign tourists to Cambodia,” said Hak.Related PostsTags: tourism

Scientists Want To Beam Spacecraft To Different Star Systems

TORONTO – Researchers have proposed a new propulsion method that could make covering the vast distances required for interstellar missions feasible within a human lifetime.The fundamental challenge in reaching a different star system lies in figuring out how to generate and transfer enough energy to a spacecraft both efficiently and affordably. The physical limitations of modern spacecraft pose significant challenges for reaching interstellar space in a human lifetime, especially with limited room onboard for carrying propellant or batteries. If we ever want to achieve the tremendous speeds necessary to cross interstellar distances in a human lifetime, we need to find outside-the-box solutions.Enter relativistic electron beams made up of electrons moving close to the speed of light. “Beaming power to the ship has long been recognized as one way to get more energy […] than we can carry with us,” Jeff Greason, Chief Technologist of Electric Sky, Inc, and chairman of the Tau Zero Foundation, told Space.com. “Energy is power [multiplied by] time — so to get a given amount of energy from a beam, you either need very high power or you need to stay in the beam a long time.”One such solution that was recently proposed uses electron beams accelerated to near the speed of light to propel spacecraft, something that could overcome the vast distances between Earth and the next closest star. “For interstellar flight, the primary challenge is that the distances are so great,” Greason explained. “Alpha Centauri is 4.3 light-years away; about 2,000 times further away from the sun than the Voyager 1 spacecraft has reached — the furthest spacecraft we’ve ever sent into deep space so far. No one is likely to fund a scientific mission that takes much longer than 30 years to return the data — that means we need to fly fast.”A study by Greason and Gerrit Bruhaug, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, published in the journal Acta Astronautica, highlights that reaching practical interstellar speeds hinges on the ability to deliver sufficient amounts of kinetic energy to the spacecraft in an economic way.“Interstellar flight requires us to collect and control vast amounts of energy to achieve speeds fast enough to be useful,” said Greason. “Chemical rockets that we use today, even with the extra speed boost from flying by planets, or from […] swinging by the sun for a boost, just don’t have the ability to scale to useful interstellar speeds.”Most theoretical studies on “beam riders” for interstellar travel have focused on laser beams, which are composed of particles of light called photons. Notable examples include laser-powered interstellar ramjets and laser sails. Ramjets propel spacecraft by compressing hydrogen gas collected from the interstellar medium, with energy supplied by a laser beam transmitted from a distant source. In contrast, laser sails use the momentum of photons from the laser beam to push the spacecraft forward.As the electron beam passes through the plasma, it sees a magnetic field due to passing by the ions left behind from the space plasma; that magnetic field creates a force that pulls the electron beam together, effectively squeezing the beam and preventing it from spreading apart. “That’s called a ‘relativistic pinch,’” said Greason. “If this all works right, we can hold the beam together in space a very long distance — thousands of times the distance from Earth to the sun — and that would provide the power to accelerate a spacecraft.”In their paper, the duo calculated that an electron beam traveling at these speeds could generate enough power to propel a 2,200 lb (1,000 kg) probe — about the same size as Voyager 1 — up to 10% of the speed of light. This would enable it to reach Alpha Centauri in just 40 years, a significant improvement over the current 70,000 years it would take.Greason argues that examples of these pinched relativistic beams already exist in deep space, such as jets of charged particles released by black holes, indicating it is hypothetically possible. “But can we produce those kinds of conditions artificially?” he asked. “Will the sun’s own magnetic field break up the beam? How would we get the electron beam started? These are all questions that remain.”In the paper, the team suggests placing a “beam-generating spacecraft” close to the sun, where the intense sunlight could provide the power needed for the beam. “While there is engineering work to do in making such a high-power beam, it’s not especially difficult compared to the other challenges,” commented Greason.To read more, click on Space

Trump Orders Tariffs, Travel Bans On Colombia Over Rejected Deportation Flights

LOADINGERROR LOADINGBOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — The White House claimed victory in a showdown with Colombia over accepting flights of deported migrants from the U.S. on Sunday, hours after President Donald Trump threatened steep tariffs on imports and other sanctions on the longtime U.S. partner.Long close partners in anti-narcotics efforts, the U.S. and Colombia clashed Sunday over the deportation of migrants and imposed tariffs on each other’s goods in a show of what other countries could face if they intervene in the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration. The White House held up the episode as a warning to other nations who might seek to impede his plans.Advertisement

Earlier, the U.S. president had ordered visa restrictions, 25% tariffs on all Colombian incoming goods, which would be raised to 50% in one week, and other retaliatory measures sparked by President Gustavo Petro’s decision to reject two Colombia-bound U.S. military aircraft carrying migrants after Petro accused Trump of not treating immigrants with dignity during deportation. Petro also announced a retaliatory 25% increase in Colombian tariffs on U.S. goods.Trump said the measures were necessary because Petro’s decision “jeopardized” national security in the U.S. by blocking the deportation flights.“These measures are just the beginning,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. “We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States.”Advertisement

Colombian migrant Margelis Tinoco, 48, cries after her CBP One appointment was canceled at the Paso del Norte international bridge in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on the border with the U.S., Monday, Jan. 20, 2025. President Donald Trump has slapped tariffs and travel bans on Colombia after its government rejected two U.S. flights carrying undocumented migrants. Colombia’s president said the country will only begin accepting such flights when the U.S. creates a policy that treats migrants with dignity.Christian Chavez via Associated PressPress secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a late Sunday statement that the “Government of Colombia has agreed to all of President Trump’s terms, including the unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay.”Leavitt said the tariff orders will be “held in reserve, and not signed.” But Leavitt said Trump would maintain visa restrictions on Colombian officials and enhanced customs inspections of goods from the country, “until the first planeload of Colombian deportees is successfully returned.”Advertisement

There was no immediate reaction from the Colombian government.U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced he was authorizing the visa restrictions on Colombian government officials and their families “who were responsible for the interference of U.S. repatriation flight operations.” They were being imposed on top of the State Department’s move to suspend the processing of visas at the U.S. Embassy in Colombia’s capital, Bogota.Earlier in the day, Petro said his government would not accept flights carrying migrants deported from the U.S. until the Trump administration creates a protocol that treats them with “dignity.” Petro made the announcement in two X posts, one of which included a news video of migrants reportedly deported to Brazil walking on a tarmac with restraints on their hands and feet.A guard stands outside the United States Embassy in Bógota on Jan. 26, 2025. Colombian President Gustavo Petro announced that he will impose 50% tariffs on U.S. exports, in response to President Donald Trump’s vow to hit Colombia with steep tariffs and other sanctions after Petro blocked the landing of two U.S. military planes carrying deported migrants.Pablo Vera/AFP via Getty ImagesAdvertisement

“A migrant is not a criminal and must be treated with the dignity that a human being deserves,” Petro said. “That is why I returned the U.S. military planes that were carrying Colombian migrants… In civilian planes, without being treated like criminals, we will receive our fellow citizens.”After Trump’s earlier tariff threat, Petro said in a post on X that he had ordered the “foreign trade minister to raise import tariffs from the U.S. by 25%.”Colombia has traditionally been the U.S.’s top ally in Latin America. But their relationship has strained since Petro, a former guerrilla, became Colombia’s first leftist president in 2022 and sought distance from the U.S.Advertisement

Colombia accepted 475 deportation flights from the U.S. from 2020 to 2024, fifth behind Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and El Salvador, according to Witness at the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data. It accepted 124 deportation flights in 2024.Colombia is also among the countries that last year began accepting U.S.-funded deportation flights from Panama.The U.S. government didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press regarding aircraft and protocols used in deportations to Colombia.Advertisement

“This is a clear message we are sending that countries have an obligation to accept repatriation flights,” a senior administration official told AP. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss issue publicly.Rubio in a statement said Petro “canceled his authorization” for the flights when the aircraft were in the air.Colombian President Gustavo Petro is pictured in a group photo after attending the meeting on Sustainable Development and Energy Transition at the G20 Leaders’ Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on Nov. 19, 2024.Mauro Pimentel/AFP via Getty ImagesAdvertisement

Colombians emerged in recent years as a major presence on the U.S. border with Mexico, aided in part by a visa regime that allows them to easily fly to Mexico and avoid trekking though the treacherous Darien Gap. They ranked fourth with 127,604 arrests for illegal crossings during a 12-month period through September, behind Mexicans, Guatemalans and Venezuelans.Mexico hasn’t imposed visa restrictions on Colombians, as they have on Venezuelans, Ecuadoreans and Peruvians.Petro’s government in a statement later announced that the South American country’s presidential aircraft had been made available to facilitate the return of migrants who were to arrive hours earlier on the U.S. military airplanes and guarantee them “dignified conditions.”Advertisement

As part of a flurry of actions to make good on Trump’s campaign promises to crack down on illegal immigration, his government is using active-duty military to help secure the border and carry out deportations.Two U.S. Air Force C-17 cargo planes carrying migrants removed from the U.S. touched down early Friday in Guatemala. That same day, Honduras received two deportation flights carrying a total of 193 people.In announcing what he called “urgent and decisive retaliatory measures,” Trump explained that he ordered the tariffs and “A Travel Ban and immediate Visa Revocations” on Colombian government officials, allies and supporters.Advertisement

“All Party Members, Family Members, and Supporters of the Colombian Government,” Trump wrote will be subject to “Visa Sanctions.” He did not say to which party he was referring to or provide any additional details on the visa and travel restrictions.Trump added that all Colombians will face enhanced customs inspections.Trump’s actions would seem to undercut his goal to reduce his country’s trade deficit. Unlike Mexico or China, Colombia is one of the few countries with a trade deficit with the U.S., of around $1.4 billion, according to U.S. trade data.Colombia is the U.S.’s second biggest buyer of corn and corn feed, according to the U.S. grains council, helping boost U.S. commodity exports from farm belt states like Iowa, Indiana and Nebraska to more than $733 million last year.Advertisement

The U.S. export boom has been driven by a two-decade-old free trade agreement between the two countries, which have for long been close partners in the war on drugs. It is unclear if Trump’s tariffs are allowed under the agreement, which contains a dispute mechanism to resolve trade fights.Colombia is the U.S.’s fourth-largest overseas supplier of crude oil, shipping about 209,000 barrels of oil per day last year, although booming domestic production has reduced the U.S.’ dependence on foreign oil. The South American country is also the U.S.’s largest supplier of fresh cut flowers.Go Ad-Free — And Protect The Free PressThe next four years will change America forever. But HuffPost won’t back down when it comes to providing free and impartial journalism.For the first time, we’re offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you’ll join us.You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We won’t back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can’t do it without you.For the first time, we’re offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you’ll join us.You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We won’t back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can’t do it without you.For the first time, we’re offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you’ll join us.Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.___Regina Garcia Cano reported from Caracas, Venezuela. Associated Press writers Zeke Miller in Washington, Jill Colvin in New York, Joshua Goodman in Miami, and Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed to this report.Advertisement

Real Estate, The Business That Gives You a Real Genuine Stat…

According to the University of Oxford’ Saïd Business School, ‘real estate makes up around 50% of the world’s assets and it is crucial to the success of global economies and societies’ — http://bit.ly/40tGJeF.It also adds that ‘in the turbulent global financial markets, an understanding of real estate is vital for senior executives, investors and policy makers worldwide’ hence the reason why it offers its Oxford Real Estate Programme targeting fund and wealth managers as well as endowments and sovereign wealth funds among others.More-so, in their article titled, The Rich List: Who Made Their Fortunes Through Real Estate? Bricksave reveals that a significant number of billionaires in this world derive their wealth from the real estate business.“Plenty of people have profited massively from real estate in the past, and this trend continues to this day: twenty-two of the newcomers to the 2016 Forbes Billionaires List owe their fortunes to real estate, while many other veterans of the same list also got their place thanks to their property interests” — https://bit.ly/40zv91u..In this case, information cited from both the University of Oxford’ Saïd Business School and Bricksave helps us to see that real estate is an important type of business that can give you a real genuine status in any state where you may choose to live in this world.Even though real estate is a profitable global phenomenon, there are some countries which seem to attract investment better than others based on various reasons including political stability and corporate governance etc.One such country is South Africa, which is among the best economies in the African continent.People who want to participate in South Africa’s lucrative property industry may choose to either buy and sell properties, start construction companies or invest in JSE listed infrastructure related businesses even though they may be foreign nationals.Yes, this is possible and legal, as long as it’s done legally!For example, based on his property ownership experience in the United Kingdom and other countries, Hopewell Chin’ono, an award-winning journalist from Zimbabwe has on numerous occasions shared tips and benefits of investment in properties especially in countries like South Africa.Hopewell Chin’ono (left), Pam Golding Estate Agent (Right)Concerning the South African market, he said, “If you are not securing your future in property using the financial tools available to you today, like mortgage bonds which are available in countries like South Africa, you only have yourself to blame.I first had an interest in buying a home in South Africa in 2000 when I saw a home advertised for sale in Centurion on a real estate website. Just like in Zimbabwe then, there were mortgages.Today, mortgages remain available in South Africa for both South Africans and foreign nationals who meet the criteria.” — https://twitter.com/daddyhope/status/1798721233120292947More-so, Ash Muller, a prominent South African real estate broker has been a consistent source of information about various property developments in the ‘Rainbow Nation’ especially in places like Cape Town where property prices either for purchase or rentals has been on the upside for some time.Ash Muller (@askashbroker)Besides insights from Hopewell Chin’ono and Ash Muller concerning the property landscape, there are also many other players in this sector who continue to shed light on the gaps that can be filled by those with an entrepreneurial spirit and mindset.For example, in their property write-up titled South African Affordable Housing: Challenges & Solutions (https://bit.ly/4gakMqX), ESI Attorneys, a Cape Town based legal services firm predominantly active in the property sector says that, ‘collaborations between the government and private developers are key to addressing the housing shortage.By combining public sector land and resources with private sector expertise and efficiency, affordable housing developments can be accelerated. These partnerships can also help bring down the costs of building and allow for quicker delivery of homes.’Over the years, South Africa has continued to have massive construction works, including residential and industrial projects sprouting all over the country thus raising the demand for both financial and human capital resources from both local and foreign investors.South Africa’s Home Affairs Department currently lists several construction industry qualifications among the dominant critical skills which the country is looking for even from other countries, thus giving a glimpse into to the real estate status in the country.The list of construction industry related skills currently on demand in South Africa includes Architects, Quantity Surveyors, Civil Engineers, Town Planning Technicians, Draughtspersons, as well as Urban and Regional Planners.

Let’s Talk Business: Jumping into the World of AI

Some days it can be difficult finding the right things to say or the right image you want to share. With the continuing advancement of technology, some of the newest tools can help get you from being stuck to unstuck quickly.As technology continues to evolve, artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a game-changer for businesses of all sizes. Whether you’re a small startup or an established enterprise, AI tools can help streamline operations, improve decision-making, and boost overall performance. But where do you start?First, identify your business needs. AI tools are designed for a variety of purposes—from automating repetitive tasks to enhancing customer engagement and analyzing data trends. Pinpoint the areas in your business where AI could add value, such as marketing, customer service, or inventory management.Next, explore user-friendly tools. Many AI platforms are designed with non-technical users in mind, offering intuitive interfaces and easy integration. For customer service, tools like ChatGPT or Intercom can improve customer interactions. Marketing platforms such as HubSpot and Marketo leverage AI to personalize campaigns and optimize content. Other platforms can help with design, data analysis, research and more.Finally, start small and scale up. Test AI tools with pilot projects before rolling them out across your organization. This approach minimizes risk while allowing you to measure impact and adjust.By embracing AI thoughtfully, businesses can unlock new opportunities for growth and innovation. Don’t wait—begin exploring how AI can work for you today.

Bestselling Books: 01/26/2025

#inform-video-player-1 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

#inform-video-player-2 .inform-embed { margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 20px; }

Northern MichiganHardcover Fiction1. “James” by Percival Everett, Doubleday Books, $28
2. “Small Things Like These” by Claire Keegan, Grove Press $203. “God of the Woods” by Liz Moore, Riverhead Books, $30Hardcover Non-Fiction1. “The Let Them Theory” by Mel Robbins, Hay House, $29.992. “The Lions Finally Roar” by Bill Morris, Pegasus Books $29.953. “The Serviceberry” Robin Wall Kimmerer & John Burgoyne, Scribner Book Co. $20Paperback Fiction1. “Smoke & Mirrors” by Aaron Stander, Writers & Editors, LLC, $17.992. “Frozen River” by Ariel Lawhon, Vintage, $183. “Orbital” by Samantha Harvey, Grove Press $17Paperback Non-Fiction1. “Gangsters Up North” by Robert Knapp, Cliophile Press, $24.95 2. “Field Guide to Northwest Michigan” by James Dake, Grass River Natural Area, $19.953. The Real Two Hearted: Life, Love, and Lore Along Michigan’s Most Iconic River by Bob Otwell, Mission Point Press $16.95— Horizon Books

“That was the beginning of a new day”: Quentin Tarantino on the movie that changed the Oscars

(Credits: Far Out / Alamy) Sun 26 January 2025 16:45, UK The decisions made by the esteemed Academy have been famously controversial over the years, with sometimes insane and nonsensical awards given to projects that are distinctly undeserving of praise. Whether it be Bohemian Rhapsody winning an Oscar for ‘Best Editing’ or Green Book winning for ‘Best Picture’, the Academy has continuously proved that they have a fading grasp on what counts as being genuinely creative by giving the prestigious prize to offensively average projects. However, among all their obvious misses and mistakes, they have made some choices that signal a shift in the industry, all before reverting back to being a pedestal of mediocrity. When asked about the Oscars, Quentin Tarantino had extensive thoughts on the times they actually got it right. While Tarantino is one of the most well-known directors working today, with an intense cult following that religiously analyses his work and reveres his unique style, he has been the recipient of only two Academy Awards.The filmmaker won an Oscar for ‘Best Original Screenplay’ for Pulp Fiction and Django Unchained, but surprisingly has never won for ‘Best Director’ or ‘Best Picture’. Who knows whether this has tainted his perception of the voting body, but regardless of these snubs, he revealed his thoughts on the films he thought most deserving of being awarded and the surprising progressiveness of the writing category. American Beauty was famously awarded the Oscar for ‘Best Picture’ in 2000, winning against The Sixth Sense, The Green Mile, The Insider and The Cider House Rules. Directed by Sam Mendes, the film follows a middle-aged man who is grappling with an existential crisis. While his life seems picturesque on the outside, he is desperately miserable, leading him to become infatuated with his teenage daughter’s best friend. It is intensely dark, melancholic and dystopian, with Mendes commenting on the disturbances of suburban life and the hidden inner worlds of the people who live all around us. While it may seem like an obvious choice compared to the other films in this category, this type of film would not typically succeed at the Oscars, which is why Tarantino was so thrilled when it won and saw it as a sign that the times were changing and Hollywood was breaking free of the tired traditions that had held it from moving forwards. When discussing this, Tarantino said, “Here is a fact, or an observation, or something I’ve just noticed about the Oscars: when American Beauty won best picture, that was the beginning of a new day. The underdog movie, the cool movie, finally won. Before that — and this is a generalization, but I think a true one — you’d have the favourite, the more Hollywood movie, and you’d have the cooler movie. You know, the critical darling. But the status quo Hollywood movie always got big respect from the middlebrow critics, the Rex Reeds of the world”. In addition, the director believes that there is one category that has always been ahead of the curve, saying, “The cool movie would always win the screenplay award. That was its consolation prize for being cool. And what this highlights is obvious: the writing branch of the Academy is much hipper. There’s no two, three, four ways about it. The progressive branch of the Academy is the writing branch”.While this may just be influenced by the fact that Tarantino has only ever won for ‘Best Original Screenplay’ and he desperately wants to be perceived as being cool, perhaps he is onto something. Maybe the writers are secretly the most daring people in Hollywood. [embedded content]Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

10 directors who bet their entire career on one movie and lost

Josh Trank (Fantastic Four, 2015)When Josh Trank was hired to helm the Fantastic Four in 2012, all the signs pointed to him being a great choice. He was one of the hottest young names in directing at that point after the massive success of Chronicle, a found-footage superhero movie that banked $125 million at the box office. In fact, 27-year-old Trank became the youngest director in history to open a film at number one – yet three years later, his career was in tatters.Fantastic Four was a troubled production, with creative differences rearing their head throughout. Trank had pitched the movie as a body horror-adjacent take on the superheroes who gain extraordinary powers after being zapped by cosmic rays, but when Marvel and Fox saw his first cut of the film, the executives baulked. Reshoots were ordered, and changes made that he wasn’t aware of, while rumours gained traction of erratic behaviour on-set.Ultimately, the film was savaged by critics and became a box-office disappointment. Trank didn’t help matters, either. After betting his entire career on Fantastic Four and seeing his vision be so severely compromised, he tried to sabotage it the day before release. It took him five long years to make another film, but his bizarre Al Capone biopic starring Tom Hardy wasn’t even granted a theatrical release.[embedded content]Francis Ford Coppola (One From the Heart, 1982)Francis Ford Coppola spent the 1970s embarking on one of the greatest runs any director has ever had. The filmmaker delivered The Godfather, The Conversation, The Godfather Part II, and Apocalypse Now consecutively, winning five Academy Awards from 12 nominations in the process.His legacy was already secure as one of his generation’s best, so he decided the best way to leverage his newfound creative freedom and wealth was to try reinventing the medium of cinema. He deserves points for trying, but all he had to show for it once One From the Heart had been released was his first declaration of bankruptcy and one of the biggest box office bombs in history.Coppola suffered even more financial misery two years later when The Cotton Club flopped after he’d funnelled even more of his own money into the production, and by his own admission, the only reason he made studio movies like Peggy Sue Got Married, The Godfather Part III, and Dracula was that he needed the money after betting big on himself and losing.[embedded content]Richard Kelly (Southland Tales, 2006)Richard Kelly’s 2001 headscratcher Donnie Darko was so brilliantly enigmatic and mysterious that Hollywood was undoubtedly convinced that Kelly was a filmmaking genius to get behind because he was soon granted a $17 million budget to make his follow-up movie, the genre-hopping dystopian opus Southland Tales.To say Kelly’s vision was ambitious would be an extreme understatement. He saw his new vision of the near future as a nine-part interactive experience, with the first six instalments taking the form of 100-page graphic novels published monthly in the lead-up to the movie and the final three encompassing the film. A website was also developed with the idea that it would go hand-in-hand with graphic novels and movies.To Kelly’s chagrin, though, writing that volume of comic book material while trying to wrangle a massive film production was too much of an ask. He sensibly reduced the graphic novel part of the story to three volumes, which were published between May 2006 and January 2007. Unfortunately, they didn’t help the film, which largely confused critics and baffled the small audience that actually paid to see it. In the end, Kelly had probably flown too close to the sun – and got his wings burned.[embedded content]Brad Bird (Tomorrowland, 2015)With The Iron Giant, The Incredibles, and Ratatouille under his belt, Brad Bird was known as one of modern animation’s finest directors, and for a while, it looked as though he would make a seamless transition into live-action.For somebody who’d never helmed a movie starring real people before, Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol was a hell of an introduction, with Bird displaying a knack for action sequences and character beats in the midst of the chaos. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a false dawn.A Tom Cruise action sequel was about a safe bet as any for his first live-action foray, and when Bird turned his hand to the semi-original Tomorrowland, it failed so badly that it even forced Disney to cancel an in-development Tron movie. Fleeing back to animation with his tail between his legs, the only film Bird has made since was The Incredibles 2. His next one? The Incredibles 3, with the filmmaker seemingly intent on remaining in his wheelhouse after venturing out of it went so badly the second time around.[embedded content]Kevin Costner (The Postman, 1997)In his defence, Kevin Costner was well within his rights to sink millions of dollars into The Postman, a movie he produced, directed, and starred in. After all, it had gone pretty well for him on Dances with Wolves.Whereas his first feature behind the camera became the highest-grossing western of all time and won seven Academy Awards from 12 nominations, including ‘Best Picture’ and ‘Best Director’, his sophomore stint wielding the megaphone suffered almost diametrically opposed fortunes.A catastrophic flop that swept the board at the Razzies by winning all five of the prizes it was shortlisted for, Costner confidently turned down the part that had been written specifically for him in Air Force One to make The Postman, a dud so overwhelming it set his career back by decades.[embedded content]Renny Harlin (Cutthroat Island, 1995)When it came time to make 1995’s Cutthroat Island, Renny Harlin was riding high in Hollywood. The Finnish action director had delivered two hits in a row with Die Hard 2 and Cliffhanger, so he was viewed as a bankable creative force. He was also married to Thelma & Louise star Geena Davis, who he wanted to turn into an action star. So, the two lovebirds teamed up on a pirate movie named Cutthroat Island, which was budgeted at $60 million. Problems cropped up almost immediately with the production. For instance, the original cinematographer broke his leg, and raw sewage leaked into the main water tank where much of the action was to be shot. Harlin wasn’t the only one who staked his reputation on Cutthroat Island, though, and he wasn’t the only one who paid dearly.To everyone’s shock, the movie didn’t just fare badly at the box office – it sank without a trace, making it a record-setting movie as the biggest bomb of all time. It also killed Carolco, as the studio went out of business following its disastrous performance. Harlin was given another couple of bites at the Hollywood apple in the late ‘90s, but his career has been firmly mired in DTV territory ever since.[embedded content]Elaine May (Ishtar, 1987)A supremely talented Bafta, Tony, and Grammy-winning actor, writer, comedian, and playwright, for a while, it looked like there was nothing Elaine May couldn’t do after Oscar-nominated rom-com The Heartbreak Kid and acclaimed crime caper Mikey and Nicky outlined her credentials as a director.Admittedly, the latter crashed and burned at the box office, and it would be another decade before May would direct again. When she did, the end result was the infamous Ishtar, forever remembered as a shining example of just how disastrously wrong a costly Hollywood production can go.Best by spiralling costs, behind-the-scenes disagreements, studio upheaval, post-production issues and more, what should have been May’s triumphant return – in a blockbuster epic with A-list stars, no less – instead endures as the final feature of her directorial career.Richard Stanley (The Island of Dr Moreau, 1996)Richard Stanley bet everything on his 1996 version of The Island of Dr Moreau – and it all went so horribly pear-shaped that a documentary was made about it. The young South African director had spent four years developing it as his dream project, and when he finally got a green light, it seemed like his dreams were about to come true. Instead, he was fired after only three days of production, which led to him shredding all the documentation of his sacking and disappearing.Official reasons were never given for Stanley’s firing, but it’s believed the studio didn’t believe he could keep star Val Kilmer under control. Kilmer, of course, was well known for being a difficult customer, and he made life hell for anyone and everyone he dealt with on the Dr Moreau set. Stanley had been offered his full directorial fee if he promised to sign on the dotted line and leave the production quietly. However, because he tore up his papers, executives were worried he’d return and sabotage the film. Amazingly, he did return, but he did it in secret – dressing as one of the dog men in the movie and performing as an extra. He didn’t burn down the set, as he threatened, instead admitting he simply had an emotional breakdown and went to ground in Australia. It took him 23 years to make another film.[embedded content]Andrew Stanton (John Carter, 2012)Winning two Oscars from five nominations as a writer, director, and producer and emerging as one of the jewels in Pixar’s crown, Andrew Stanton’s Finding Nemo and Wall-E kicked his behind-the-camera career off with a pair of massively successful, beloved, and acclaimed smash hits.Remaining under the Disney banner, Stanton opted to take the plunge and try his luck in live-action. Instead of easing himself in with a smaller-scale picture, he decided that one of the most expensive productions in history was the perfect way to get his feet wet.Things couldn’t have gone much worse when John Carter wound up as the single biggest box office bomb there’s ever been, and there were no surprises when Stanton’s follow-up, Finding Dory, saw him return to Pixar and play it as safe as possible for what was always going to be a hit. He was at least brave enough to return to live-action, but alarm bells are already ringing after sci-fi drama In the Blink of an Eye wrapped production in May 2023 but still doesn’t have a release date. [embedded content]Michael Cimino (Heaven’s Gate, 1980)Michael Cimino’s epic western cost four times the original initial budget, and the production was an unmitigated nightmare for everyone involved. Accusations of animal abuse on the set and rumours of the director’s tyrannical behaviour swirled in the air for months, casting a dark cloud over proceedings. In fact, by the time the film was actually released, it had a nuclear reputation. Reviews labelled Cimino’s picture as one of the worst movies ever made, and it only clawed back a mere $3.5 million at the box office against a budget of $44 million. The terrible press and horrifying financial return caused Transamerica Corporation, United Artists’ corporate overlord, to sell the independent studio to MGM. After that, Transamerica ceased film production altogether.Not only that, but it instigated a paradigm shift in the industry that saw Hollywood move away from the kind of director-driven material that thrived in the ‘New Hollywood’ era. Instead, it began to look toward high-concept blockbusters like Jaws and Star Wars. Cimino only directed four more films after Heaven’s Gate, none of which were anywhere near as ambitious.[embedded content]

Critic’s choice: Roger Ebert’s 10 favourite movies of the 1990s

(Credits: Far Out / Thomas Hawk) Sun 26 January 2025 18:20, UK The power of the movies is often talked about with the sincere reverence it deserves. Films have the chance to not only change the way society talks, dresses or behaves but to make a seismic impact on the way it is governed and how the inhabitants within it treat one another. With this in mind, there is far less concern over film critics’ power. With one stroke of a pen, a good critic can endorse a movie and make it a hit overnight; that was certainly the power Roger Ebert had at his disposal.Starting his impressive career in 1967, when he was given a chance to write critical reviews of movie releases for the Chicago Sun-Times, Ebert would become perhaps the most celebrated critic of his generation. He just happened to ascend to the position during one of America’s most pivotal cinematic cultural changes. During the 1970s, the merging of independent, intellectualised movies and mainstream cinema began in full force. As cinema changed, so did its criticism, and the words of a skilled technician like Ebert were now more valued than ever.His career gathered pace throughout the following decades, and by the time the new wave of Hollywood began to peak once more in the 1990s, as auteurs like Quentin Tarantino began to find their feet, Ebert was rightly heralded as a titanic tastemaker. It means his version of the decade’s best movies is well worth adding to your watchlist. When sat across from one director for whom he held special affection, Martin Scorsese, the critic selected his favoured films from the 1990s, and it makes for an interesting set of titles.Starting off with number ten is the 1991 Oliver Stone movie JFK, which grabbed eight Academy Award nominations and a lot of fierce criticism at the time for Ebert. However, it was a “dazzling stylistic recreation of the paranoia, suspicion and mystery that still surrounds the Kennedy assassination“. Another pivotal political figure was given time on the big screen the following year with Spike Lee’s 1992 movie Malcolm X, which Ebert found particularly brilliant because of “Denzel Washington’s great performance as the charismatic black leader that provided an angrier, more radical alternative to the voice of Martin Luther King”.Nic Cage’s performance in Leaving Las Vegas earns both Ebert’s respect and a spot on his favourite movie list, while Lars Von Trier’s 1996 picture Breaking the Waves also gains a spot. Naturally, one of the grandest, most poignant movies of the decade, Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List is given a correct spot, with Ebert once again singling out the performance of a leading man: “Liam Neeson as a daring and good-hearted man who saves the lives of eleven-hundred Jews by conning the Nazis with their own cruel rules.”Ebert bends the rules somewhat by selecting a trilogy, as he collects Krzysztof Kieślowski’s Three Colours: Red, White and Blue into one series. Noting them for how “They look at the way our lives are lived at the mercy of fate, coincidence and blind chance”. Following this somewhat different choice, Ebert then selects three movies that could be inserted into most people’s favourite movies of the 1990s list. Coen brothers’ 1996 picture Fargo, which he called a “genuinely exciting and ingenious crime plot”, the Martin Scorsese movie Goodfellas, about which Ebert effuses Scorsese’ deftly directed masterpiece, and Taranitno’s Pulp Fiction. “It’s a complete original,” explains Ebert, though that comes with a downside: “Which unfortunately inspired way too many other young filmmakers to write way too much Tarantinian dialogue. They knew the words, but not the music.”Perhaps the most surprising pick is slot number one, which Ebert hands over gleefully to Steve James and his 1994 documentary Hoop Dreams. Originally meant to be a simple 30-minute documentary about inner-city kids who have a chance of becoming serious ball players, the project evolved into 250 hours of footage. For Ebert, it defines the importance of film: “The film just kept on growing as it followed their lives covering almost five years –as they’re both recruited by a suburban high school basketball powerhouse, and fate makes a twist in their destinies. To me, the greatest value of film is that it helps us break out of our boxes of time and space and empathize with other people – it lets us walk in someone else’s shoes.”Roger Ebert’s 10 favourite movies of the 1990s:Hoop Dreams (Steve James, 1994)Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino,1994)Goodfellas (Martin Scorsese, 1990)Fargo (Coen brothers, 1996)Three Colours: Red, White and Blue (Krzysztof Kieślowski, 1994)Schindler’s List (Stephen Spielberg, 1993)Breaking the Waves (Lars Von Trier, 1996)Leaving Las Vegas (Mike Figgis, 1995)Malcolm X (Spike Lee, 1992)JFK (Oliver Stone, 1991)[embedded content]Related TopicsSubscribe To The Far Out Newsletter